<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Wikipedia Reliability &#8211; Nature Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slaw.ca/2006/01/04/more-on-wikipedia-reliability-nature-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/01/04/more-on-wikipedia-reliability-nature-comparison/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s online legal magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon C</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/01/04/more-on-wikipedia-reliability-nature-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 02:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/2006/01/04/more-on-wikipedia-reliability-nature-comparison/#comment-396</guid>
		<description>They say that breaking up is hard to do.  Neil Sedaka at http://www.geocities.com/merrystar3/allysongs/BreakingUpIsHardToDo.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say that breaking up is hard to do.  Neil Sedaka at <a href="http://www.geocities.com/merrystar3/allysongs/BreakingUpIsHardToDo.htm">http://www.geocities.com/merrystar3/allysongs/BreakingUpIsHardToDo.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Fodden</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/01/04/more-on-wikipedia-reliability-nature-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Fodden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 01:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/2006/01/04/more-on-wikipedia-reliability-nature-comparison/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Keeping up is hard to do. Wasn&#039;t that a song once?

Especially when your laptop machine is pop-flooded and goes in for repairs, as Ted&#039;s was. 

I wonder if we&#039;re getting to the stage where it makes sense to &quot;search first and post later.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keeping up is hard to do. Wasn&#039;t that a song once?</p>
<p>Especially when your laptop machine is pop-flooded and goes in for repairs, as Ted&#039;s was. </p>
<p>I wonder if we&#039;re getting to the stage where it makes sense to &#034;search first and post later.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon C</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/01/04/more-on-wikipedia-reliability-nature-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 21:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/2006/01/04/more-on-wikipedia-reliability-nature-comparison/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, Ted, but Slaw.ca had that reference tagged the day after publication.
See:
Footnote to Wikipedia Reliability Debate

Thursday, December 15th, 2005 
One of our open-source savvy articling students, Jon Smithen, just drew my attention to a piece in this week&#039;s Nature which strongly suggests that Wikipedia&#039;s integrity in the scientific field approaches that of the conventional encyclopaedias. My experience on the legal side endorsed that view too.

So this really is old news to slaw.ca readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, Ted, but Slaw.ca had that reference tagged the day after publication.<br />
See:<br />
Footnote to Wikipedia Reliability Debate</p>
<p>Thursday, December 15th, 2005<br />
One of our open-source savvy articling students, Jon Smithen, just drew my attention to a piece in this week&#039;s Nature which strongly suggests that Wikipedia&#039;s integrity in the scientific field approaches that of the conventional encyclopaedias. My experience on the legal side endorsed that view too.</p>
<p>So this really is old news to slaw.ca readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.slaw.ca/2006/01/04/more-on-wikipedia-reliability-nature-comparison/feed/ ) in 0.34258 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:58 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 1:58 am UTC -->
