<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian blasphemy law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/</link>
	<description>A Canadian cooperative weblog on all things legal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:07:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Atheist Jew</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/comment-page-1/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>The Atheist Jew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/#comment-658</guid>
		<description>If that Canadian law is still in affect, I&#039;m in big doo doo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that Canadian law is still in affect, I&#8217;m in big doo doo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/#comment-605</guid>
		<description>I was intrigued by these posting. Like Simon, I use the Oxford  Companion to Law for intitial research in these kinds of areas. The entry  under blasphemy gives a leading UK case of Bowman v. Seculary Society [1917] AC 406 and a text by Nokes, &quot;History of the Crime of Blasphmeny&quot;. Nick is only partially right, I think, about current controversy over Christianity in court, at least in the US, as witness recent cases on &quot;intelligent design&quot;. See Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (December 2005)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was intrigued by these posting. Like Simon, I use the Oxford  Companion to Law for intitial research in these kinds of areas. The entry  under blasphemy gives a leading UK case of Bowman v. Seculary Society [1917] AC 406 and a text by Nokes, &#8220;History of the Crime of Blasphmeny&#8221;. Nick is only partially right, I think, about current controversy over Christianity in court, at least in the US, as witness recent cases on &#8220;intelligent design&#8221;. See Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (December 2005)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon C</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>Hungarian phrasebook anyone?
http://www.geocities.com/fang_club/hungarian_phrasebook.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hungarian phrasebook anyone?<br />
<a href="http://www.geocities.com/fang_club/hungarian_phrasebook.html">http://www.geocities.com/fang_club/hungarian_phrasebook.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 18:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else feel like we are living through a Monty Python skit with this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else feel like we are living through a Monty Python skit with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon C</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 17:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Well if you&#039;re giving links, the whole enchillada is at http://face-of-muhammed.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if you&#8217;re giving links, the whole enchillada is at <a href="http://face-of-muhammed.blogspot.com/">http://face-of-muhammed.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Fodden</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Fodden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>You can see one of the cartoons that have caused the fuss on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=15&amp;entry_id=2796&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SFGate site&lt;/a&gt;, a web site for the San Francisco Chronicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see one of the cartoons that have caused the fuss on the <a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=15&amp;entry_id=2796">SFGate site</a>, a web site for the San Francisco Chronicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon C</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/2006/02/07/canadian-blasphemy-law/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you remember Whitehouse v. Lemon, the gay Christ poem case?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehouse_v._Lemon
And for recent commentary see http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,6109,753268,00.html
Today it wouldn&#039;t survive a Canadian Charter challenge but interestingly Blair has had problems in this area recently.  See Rowan Atkinson and the defeated amendments to the Racial and Religious Hatred Bill,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,17129-2020243,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you remember Whitehouse v. Lemon, the gay Christ poem case?  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehouse_v._Lemon">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehouse_v._Lemon</a><br />
And for recent commentary see <a href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,6109,753268,00.html">http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,6109,753268,00.html</a><br />
Today it wouldn&#8217;t survive a Canadian Charter challenge but interestingly Blair has had problems in this area recently.  See Rowan Atkinson and the defeated amendments to the Racial and Religious Hatred Bill,<br />
<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,17129-2020243,00.html">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,17129-2020243,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
