This just in, Lexis/Quicklaw is intending to charge $50 per head for Academic Access at Canadian Law Schools starting next September.
So a Canadian Law School with 500 students would be charged $25000 starting September 2008.
I'm going to save my comments for later.
Respond: make a comment | read the 15 comments
Share:
Email
|
Save as PDF | Print
|
Bookmark & Share
|
|
More: in Miscellaneous | from Mark Lewis
|
the count:
8231 posts | 11419 comments
recent comments  
Max Amsterdam once said: “Business is the art of extracting money from another man’s pocket without resorting to violence.” The purpose of having a written agreement between all … »»Practice There is good leagal content that doesn’t necessarily come in the neat packages that we usually look in. Though our commercial legal database subscriptions have linked, vetted, edited, and easily. […] »»Research When you need to collaborate on a document displayed on your screen, it’s great to have a colleague from down the hall come into your office and look over your … »»Technology
-
Available online today are four new chapters of the publication Women in Canada: A Gender-based Statistical Report, which explores the socio-demographic and economic circumstances of Canadian women in general.
-
The bill amends the Constitution Act, 1867 by readjusting the number of members and the representation of the provinces in the House of Commons.
-
-
Blueseed plans to buy a ship and turn it into a floating incubator anchored in international waters off the coast of California.
-
Under Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the flow of information out of Ottawa has slowed to a trickle.
-
-
"…the IPC has exclusive jurisdiction to decide whether a record is in the custody or control of a university in the context of an access request…"
-
-
John J.L. Hunter, Q.C. of Vancouver has been elected President for 2011-2012
-
Detailed results from 321 members.
These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.
-
Banks and Banking - Liability of banks to third parties - Negligence - General
The plaintiffs were the former shareholders of a company that failed. They sued the defendant bank alleging that it breached its contract with the company and the plaintiffs and breached a duty ...
-
Actions - Cause of action - General principles - New or extended cause of action - Opening of floodgates
The plaintiff and defendant worked at different branches of the same bank. The defendant’s common-law husband was the plaintiff’s ex-husband. Over a four year period, the defendant ...
-
Aliens - Definitions and general principles - Immigration consultants
The Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) had been designated as the sole regulatory body of immigration consultants in Canada from 2004 until June 2011. On June 30, 2011, Bill C-35 came into force, which significantly amended ...
-
Criminal Law - Sexual offences, public morals and disorderly conduct - Public morals - Obscenity - Possession of child pornography
The accused was convicted of making child pornography available and two counts of possession of child pornography (see [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 197). Subsequently, he was sentenced ...
-
Criminal Law - Procedure - Charge or directions - Jury or judge alone - Directions regarding pleas or evidence of witnesses, co-accused and accomplices
Rowe was convicted by a jury of five offences. He appealed.
The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed ...
-
Narcotic Control - Offences - Possession - General
The accused wished to access marijuana for medicinal purposes but did not have an authorization to possess marijuana issued under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations. He was notified that a package of marihuana addressed to him had been ...
-
Narcotic Control - General - Legislation - Exemptions - Medicinal marijuana
McCrady, who had an application pending under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) to possess and grow marijuana, was convicted of possession of marijuana (Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), s. 4(1)). Hearn pleaded guilty ...
-
Criminal Law - Sentence - Trafficking in hashish or marijuana (incl. possession for purposes of trafficking)
The accused pleaded guilty to one count of possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking. He was sentenced to 30 days’ imprisonment to be served intermittently and 11 months’ ...
-
Municipal Law - Powers of municipalities - Particular powers - Imposition and collection of taxes or fees
Catalyst Paper Corp. operated a paper mill in the District of North Cowichan. Catalyst objected to the tax rate that it paid compared to residential ratepayers. In 2009, the ...
This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.
Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.
Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.
|
It is hard to believe that, for a similar aggregate sum, CanLII could not be improved to the point that it would provide many of the same services to law students — with the difference that those improvements be available to all and on an ongoing basis.
If I was running a law school, I would simply tell my faculty that our students will now be relying on Westlaw and CanLii for their research needs.
Perhaps QL will go back to free student accounts when they notice the impact of several cohorts of new lawyers who find it easier to do research without them.
This is a shame. QL surpasses Westlaw in a few crucial ways (labour arbitration cases for one), and regardless of whether the Law schools absorb the cost (unlikely) or download it onto students (hmmm), I see problems on the horizon.
If Westlaw doesn't do something similar, I'd be very worried if I were QL.
There's (essentially) nothing that a LLB/JD student can't do using Westlaw/CanLii/Hein that they would need QL for. As a student, I'd be very upset if my school was putting tuition dollars toward QL if those other services were available cost-free.
Worst business move of the year.
Free QL for law schools has been the best marketing dollars that QL/Lex has ever spent.
I am waiting to get the details since, as Steve notes, this would be a surprising and awful marketing decision. Considering the hours academic and firm librarians spend each year teaching students how to use QL/Lexis effectively they should be paying us per student! Oh well, one fewer platform to worry about.
I guess this means that the long honeymoon between QL and Canadian law schools has finally come to an end. Sigh!
add to this that QL is losing CLB content (including DLR), it sounds like they are heading a dangerous path, risking to be judged useless both in terms of cost and content.
First reaction: what a bad marketing move.
Second tought: before I fully verbalize my toughts on this seemingly bad marketing move, I wonder what motivated QL/Lex to adopt such a strategy? We could perhaps think of students were abusing the system, but would a nominal charge of $50.00 prevent any further abuse if that is the case?
Mark, any idea on the motives behind this?
One of the nominal reasons given was the expense of developing the new interface.
How much do students actually use Quicklaw? From assisting practitioner teachers with casebook prep,and from orienting new articling students over the years, I would suggest that the answer is not as much as we think they should.
Aside from the preceived poor LNQL business decision, perhaps not having Quicklaw will not be a big deal to law students. Now, if they didn't have access to treatises…oh wait – LNQL does have textbook content. I wonder what the good folks at Irwin Law are thinking about this decision.
I agree with those who raise the idea of CANLII as the alternative. I seldom go onto QL these days, and find myself there only to search journal articles and non-decision-related content.
The idea of directing the funds to support CANLII development is a brilliant one, and I hope that the schools give it some serious thought.
LNQL's decision to charge law students is a business decision and from my point-of-view as an academic law librarian I will now be evaluating it like any other legal research database we subscribe to.
It should be pointed out that charging for student access to Westlaw or Lexis has long been the practice in the US. As Richard has pointed out, the "long honeymoon" is over. This development was probably inevitable once Quicklaw left private ownership.
Bear in mind that so far Westlaw/ECarswell has not charged anything. And that there are other alternatives provided by other publishers such as Maritime Law Book and CCH which should be taken more seriously.
As for CANLII, it should by now I hope be considered as a real alternative to the commerical products, and as law students need to know how to use it and what it is good for, just like we have always done for the commercial vendors.
The one major concern I have in all this is that we are back to having duplication of services and reporting, which has plagued legal publishing in the common law world since the nineteenth century, and has particularly been a concern in Canada.
Neil,
For case law: it's my view that we've reached the point, with at least the major Commonweath LIIs, that nobody who knows the basics of the subject matter needs to start with the commercial services for current case law.
These days, where case law is involved, I head for eCarswell or QL just for older cases of where I want a headnote. (I assuming that, just as here, the other Commonwealth courts send their judgments to the local LIIs at the same time as they're sent to commercial publsihers.
What this means, I think, is that the future of the commercial publishers has to be in the value added material: analyses, summaries, commentaries, journals, reviews etc. A good example, for case law, is the excellent notes the various Carswell specialty reporters often have or had. Of course, if one isn't going to get paid for work, it would be better provided to one's jurisdiction's LII.
David
Law students don't need QuickLaw. I have found WestLaw easier and more efficient, especially given that the CED and the Canadian Abridgment are readily available. If law students don't need / learn to use Quicklaw, I guess future lawyers won't need it either. Maybe if LNQL wanted to save money, they could cut back on the free travel mugs they give out at their student seminars.