Wikis and KM at Law Firms

Bill Ives has a couple of posts on the use of wikis for knowledge management at law firms on his blog, Portals and KM.

In Wikis in Knowledge Management at Law Firms – Part One: ThoughtFarmer Example he reports on a discussion at a recent event in Boston, where two examples were discussed. The first was of a Canadian firm (unnamed) where the KM and IT people had set up Domino wikis (i.e. inside the firewall) for the various practice groups. The result was that they created silos of information. As a solution they turned to ThoughtFarmer. After an initial trial period:

The wiki was now the only intranet and document management system. It tracks recent changes and who did it and you can see their picture. KM allows others to add tags and supplements existing tags. Since May 12: 416 pages created, 776 documents added, 299 links crated 18 comments added.

The second post by Ives, Wikis in Knowledge Management at Law Firms – Part Two: Sharepoint Example, explores another firm’s use of a Sharepoint wiki.

Currently there are 2 comments on “Wikis and KM at Law Firms” :

  1. Connie Crosby has this comment:
    October 9th, 2008 at 6:29 pm

    Hi! That unnamed Canadian firm was actually named in Canadian Lawyer magazine recently, so hopefully I am not telling any tales out of school. It is Hicks Morley, and Heather Colman was our presenter talking about how they went from proof of concept and pilot project to full implementation of ThoughtFarmer in under a year. A fantastic precedent for small- to medium-sized firms.

  2. Heather Colman has this comment:
    October 10th, 2008 at 10:54 am

    Thanks for your comments Connie. Here is a link to the article in Canadian Lawyer which contains more details about our ThoughtFarmer implementation: http://www.hicksmorley.com/images/WIKI.pdf

SOME COMMENTS MODERATED

If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products.

Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.