Cyndee Todgham Cherniak, of Lang Michener LLP, writes for the Trade Lawyers Blog that a courier package addressed to her as counsel at her law firm was opened by Canada Border Services Agency. The package was sent by Dr. Henry T. King of the Canada-United States Law Institute. CBSA had marked the package "EXAMINED / RELEASED – CUSTOMS – TORONTO – DOUANES, EXAMINÉ / LIBERÉ". As she points out in her post, this invasion of privacy has ramifications for solicitor-client communications.
Is it simply naïve to believe that cross-border communications are in fact private and that the various national security agencies do not read our letters and our emails on an as-needed basis? And as for packages, when ought objects sent to lawyers be immune from customs scrutiny?
[via Michael Geist]
Respond: make a comment | read the 4 comments
Share:
Email
|
Save as PDF | Print
|
Bookmark & Share
|
|
More: in Miscellaneous | from Simon Fodden
|
the count:
8231 posts | 11416 comments
recent comments  
Max Amsterdam once said: “Business is the art of extracting money from another man’s pocket without resorting to violence.” The purpose of having a written agreement between all … »»Practice There is good leagal content that doesn’t necessarily come in the neat packages that we usually look in. Though our commercial legal database subscriptions have linked, vetted, edited, and easily. […] »»Research When you need to collaborate on a document displayed on your screen, it’s great to have a colleague from down the hall come into your office and look over your … »»Technology
-
Available online today are four new chapters of the publication Women in Canada: A Gender-based Statistical Report, which explores the socio-demographic and economic circumstances of Canadian women in general.
-
The bill amends the Constitution Act, 1867 by readjusting the number of members and the representation of the provinces in the House of Commons.
-
-
Blueseed plans to buy a ship and turn it into a floating incubator anchored in international waters off the coast of California.
-
Under Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the flow of information out of Ottawa has slowed to a trickle.
-
-
"…the IPC has exclusive jurisdiction to decide whether a record is in the custody or control of a university in the context of an access request…"
-
-
John J.L. Hunter, Q.C. of Vancouver has been elected President for 2011-2012
-
Detailed results from 321 members.
These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.
-
Banks and Banking - Liability of banks to third parties - Negligence - General
The plaintiffs were the former shareholders of a company that failed. They sued the defendant bank alleging that it breached its contract with the company and the plaintiffs and breached a duty ...
-
Actions - Cause of action - General principles - New or extended cause of action - Opening of floodgates
The plaintiff and defendant worked at different branches of the same bank. The defendant’s common-law husband was the plaintiff’s ex-husband. Over a four year period, the defendant ...
-
Aliens - Definitions and general principles - Immigration consultants
The Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) had been designated as the sole regulatory body of immigration consultants in Canada from 2004 until June 2011. On June 30, 2011, Bill C-35 came into force, which significantly amended ...
-
Criminal Law - Sexual offences, public morals and disorderly conduct - Public morals - Obscenity - Possession of child pornography
The accused was convicted of making child pornography available and two counts of possession of child pornography (see [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 197). Subsequently, he was sentenced ...
-
Criminal Law - Procedure - Charge or directions - Jury or judge alone - Directions regarding pleas or evidence of witnesses, co-accused and accomplices
Rowe was convicted by a jury of five offences. He appealed.
The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed ...
-
Narcotic Control - Offences - Possession - General
The accused wished to access marijuana for medicinal purposes but did not have an authorization to possess marijuana issued under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations. He was notified that a package of marihuana addressed to him had been ...
-
Narcotic Control - General - Legislation - Exemptions - Medicinal marijuana
McCrady, who had an application pending under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) to possess and grow marijuana, was convicted of possession of marijuana (Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), s. 4(1)). Hearn pleaded guilty ...
-
Criminal Law - Sentence - Trafficking in hashish or marijuana (incl. possession for purposes of trafficking)
The accused pleaded guilty to one count of possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking. He was sentenced to 30 days’ imprisonment to be served intermittently and 11 months’ ...
-
Municipal Law - Powers of municipalities - Particular powers - Imposition and collection of taxes or fees
Catalyst Paper Corp. operated a paper mill in the District of North Cowichan. Catalyst objected to the tax rate that it paid compared to residential ratepayers. In 2009, the ...
This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.
Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.
Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.
|
As someone who frequently ordered materials from the U.S. for a law firm (mostly books, but sometimes documents), I was used to Customs examining packages. In fact, this would frequently cause unnecessary delays which I would warn people waiting for the materials about. Packages were not always opened, but they were usually held. It seemed to me on my bit of anecdotal evidence that law firms were specifically targeted. Aside from GST owing on purchased items, I don't know what they were hoping to find. Does anyone else experience this on a regular basis?
Then, there was the one time a colleague from the U.S. tried to mail me a book and it was returned to him by the U.S. postal service as something they could not send to Canada. We're still not sure why as it was pretty innocuous (it was a tourism piece from his local tourism board).
@ Connie: Would you expect a difference in treatment of mail addressed to a firm generally (or, say, to its library) and mail addressed and marked specifically to counsel?
How would the border agents know the difference, if the package was addressed to a person? Perhaps it would be useful to have some guidance from Customs on how to label/address items which are privileged.
And if they are concerned that the package may contain something other than documents, x-ray would reveal contraband without showing what's on a document, I assume.
@Greg – excellent question. I don't honestly know. Everything I had was addressed either to me (not counsel) or to the Library.
@Wendy – X-ray seems to be a more sensible approach than opening. I also think the way something is packaged and labelled likely makes a difference, so getting some guidance is a good idea. I found there was rarely a problem, for example, when having something sent by Fedex because they had their own customs brokers and seemed to know the process better. Things sent by mail or other courier companies were more likely held and/or opened for inspection. I was always willing to pay additional for Fedex on something time sensitive (I didn't deal in privileged documents).