Turns out Slaw didn't do so bad in the ABA blog awards Tech category. After a recount, we've placed second!
Now for the fun part… Google cache (while it lasts) shows a significant number of votes were removed from the system from the time the contest closed and the final numbers being released. (Hat tip to Bob Ambrogi)
Before the recount:
- FutureLawyer, 1930 votes
- Technolawyer blog, 1545 votes (Corrected as noticed by Neil Squillante below)
- Mac Lawyer, 509 votes
- Ross Ipsa Loquitur, 348 votes
- Slaw, 317 votes
- Jim Calloway, 169 votes
- Real Lawyers Have Blogs, 132 votes
- Ernie the Attorney, 93 votes
- Dennis Kennedy, 81 votes
- Inter Alia, 64 votes
AND after the recount:
- Technolawyer blog, 1499 votes
- Slaw, 295 votes
- Mac Lawyer, 256 votes
- FutureLawyer, 241 votes
- Jim Calloway, 150 votes
- Real Lawyers Have Blogs, 105 votes
- Ross Ipsa Loquitur, 102 votes
- Ernie the Attorney, 93 votes
- Dennis Kennedy, 82 votes
- Inter Alia, 64 votes
Not to throw stones without blame here — we did have 22 votes removed (for which I'll take full credit – I voted on my mother's computer at Christmas, and once on IE, FF, Safari, etc.) — but… I KNEW there must be some shenanigans going on.
Top marks to ABA Journal staff for checking duplicate IP addresses. Well done, and crisis averted! … At least for the contest itself. :)
Respond: make a comment | read the 12 comments
Share:
Email
|
Save as PDF | Print
|
Bookmark & Share
|
|
More: in Administration of Slaw | from Steven Matthews
|
the count:
8635 posts | 11929 comments
recent comments  
Following on our earlier Top 10 Financial Errors posts, this is the first in a series of 10 posts dealing with Cash Flow Reports and in particular, cash flow management.… »»Practice Today’s research tip is about facts. When research is assigned to juniors (and librarians for that matter) it is important to share facts that are critical to the research. It … »»Research If you are using Office 2007 or 2010, The Ribbon is now a part of your life. Some of you will be happy about this – some of you won’t.… »»Technology
-
-
-
Available online today are four new chapters of the publication Women in Canada: A Gender-based Statistical Report, which explores the socio-demographic and economic circumstances of Canadian women in general.
-
The bill amends the Constitution Act, 1867 by readjusting the number of members and the representation of the provinces in the House of Commons.
-
-
Blueseed plans to buy a ship and turn it into a floating incubator anchored in international waters off the coast of California.
-
Under Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the flow of information out of Ottawa has slowed to a trickle.
-
-
"…the IPC has exclusive jurisdiction to decide whether a record is in the custody or control of a university in the context of an access request…"
-
These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.
-
Aliens - Exclusion and expulsion - Power to detain and deport - Minister’s certificate - Review - Evidence
In 2002, Harkat was detained pursuant to a ministerial security certificate issued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) as a person inadmissible to Canada on grounds ...
-
Contracts - Formation of contract - Signing - Electronic signature
The plaintiff expressed an interest in purchasing the defendant’s (vendor’s) condo. The parties agreed to carry on their discussions through e-mail. Following an exchange of e-mails, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was contractually bound to ...
-
Barristers and Solicitors - Relationship with client - Confidential communications - General
The petitioner was a Receiver appointed in March 2009 by a California court over the assets of GJB Enterprises Inc. (a “Ponzi scheme”) and its principals, the Berkes (the GJB parties). The court ordered ...
-
Practice - Costs - Funding before judgment - When interim or advance costs available
The plaintiffs were “direct to home” satellite based subscription program providers. Rex and other defendants offered “grey market” services to Canadian residents to facilitate the unauthorized reception in Canada of the plaintiffs’ ...
This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.
Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.
Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.
|
Nice analysis. One correction. Our raw vote total was 1,545. We lost 46 votes after the recount. Congratulations on receiving mostly honest votes as we did.
Thanks for the correction Neil. All in all, a nice testament to the TL community. Congratulations. :)
Thanks, Steve. This is good news: I'm happy to be runner up to TechnoLawyer any day. (Good thing I didn't give in to my impulse to ask people to do the Mayor Daley thing: "Vote early, vote often.") And thanks to all of those who voted (once) for Slaw!
Ah! I was able to vote multiple times from my same computer, same browser. I thought it was set up that way. Still, I probably only voted about 3-4 times total. Others may have done the same, however.
FWIW, "rigged" isn't really the word I would use for this. I was looking forward to something genuinely seedy – on the part of the ABA – but per Connie's comment, this seems to have been more a question of (relatively) innocent incompetence than "rigging."
Btw, how did Dennis Kennedy's tally *increase*?…
Gee, I don't know: 1700 duplicate votes is getting close to seedy.
I really liked the ABA Journal's headline on this issue: "Some People Love the Blawg 100 a Little Too Much"
The problem is that hundreds of law students voting from the same law school would still have the same IP.
IP based voting controls are not perfect either.
Same would go for networks that only have one external IP address, which would include many firms.
Omar's point is well taken. Law schools and firms coming off the same proxy server will have the same IP address, and an email to a local group to drum up support (which should be fair game) could have a similar effect.
However, duplicate IPs weren't the only factor considered. From the ABA post Shauna mentions, they noted multiple votes in short succession (read: seconds & automated) coming from the same IP, along with C-class IP ranges from overseas. Plus there was a human review by the ABA.
So while IP voting isn't perfect, I'd say they did their diligence, and injected human eyes when it helped. FWIW.
Dennis Kennedy's vote total didn't really increase. The Google cache Steven found is from a few hours before the voting ended. That's why he had the wrong raw vote total for us as well.
Regarding the IP address issue, that's above my pay grade but I believe the ABA allowed a certain number of votes per IP address and that they also looked at patterns. Honest voting tends to look random whereas someone deleting cookies, voting, deleting cookies, voting, etc. occurs in a recognizable pattern.
One thing I do know a lot about is email. We knew that some of these votes were not coming from email (as ours were).
Connie, I think the ABA's primary concern was someone voting hundreds or thousands of times..
How can they tell they're "automated"? If, in fact, a law school was responsible, it would be entirely possible for a large class, upon hearing from a classmate about the voting, to all vote in a short period of time.
When I was in my last year of law school, wireless access was added. During class, many students ran chat programs like Instant Messenger and passed information around.
And, yes, how did someone's tally actually go UP?