Obama – Executive Order on Presidential Records
Well it is great to see some rational decision making coming out of the Whitehouse these days. Today I note Obama’s Executive Order on Presidential Records has been added to the Whitehouse website.
Hopefully this will help fulfill one of the many things on Michel-Adrien’s Wish List!
Here’s a snippet:
“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies and procedures governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent and former Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant to the Presidential Records Act of 1978, it is hereby ordered as follows…”
By the way, Obama’s Executive Order – Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Personnel has also been posted.
Happy New Year!

Currently there are 3 comments on “Obama – Executive Order on Presidential Records” :
SOME COMMENTS MODERATED
If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products.
Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.


January 22nd, 2009 at 10:44 pm
I suppose it adds to the apparent legitimacy of the action for it to be expressed in such archaic legalese (“gee, I guess he’s really the President, he’s sounding like the other Presidents”), but as a matter of pure (?) style, if you start “by the authority vested in me…” should you not continue “I order that…”, rather than “it is hereby ordered” (not even “by me”)?
Is there any legal point to the recital of the authority, especially when it is so general? Or is it just bluff and bluster while people start paying attention, or to make them pay attention by mentioning such important stuff as the Constitution and the laws of the USA?
January 23rd, 2009 at 8:45 am
It’s funny how records management has surged into prominence in the past few weeks – first, with the concern that NARA and/or Library of Congress would not have the capacity to store the volume of electronic records (mostly e-mail) generated by the Bush administration, then the sudden disappearance/reappearance of 15 million records related to the Katrina response and the war in Iraq.
For all its bluster, it is nice to see the Obama administration thinking about this issue in advance, rather than bumbling around afterward.
January 23rd, 2009 at 10:06 am
For those of us who are not lawyers or constitutional scholars, what does this Executive Order ACTUALLY DO?
I’ve tried reading it, but I fall asleep at about the second paragraph.