A woman in Switzerland working for Nationale Suisse told her employer she couldn't work at the computer, and had to stay home in the dark.

A fellow employee supposedly noticed her surfing on Facebook and reported her. And yes, it cost her the job.

The employee's quite plausible position was that she was surfing Facebook on her iPhone in bed. She also accused them of spying on her.

Most workers are becoming aware that privacy controls should be used to protect personal information, even from employers. And persons added as "friends" probably shouldn't include those that will try to get you fired.

Is the employer required to investigate how the employee was actually accessing Facebook? And if not, are these reasonably sufficient grounds for dismissal?

Considering the already low expectation of privacy of employees in the workplace, does this type of monitoring constitute an unreasonable intrusion?

Omar Ha-Redeye is a Toronto lawyer focusing on health law and reputation management. He has a background in Nuclear Medicine Technology, Health Management and Public Relations.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

2 Comments on “Facebook Surfing Cost Swiss Woman Her Job”

  1. Tim B says:

    If this is a completely isolated incident between this employer and employee then I would suggest that she might have grounds for wrongful dismissal (in Canada). However, the facts in the story are so thin that I am assuming there's more to it: There's "abuse of trust", and there's abuse of trust, and even a bank can tell the difference.

    Browsing the web at home when you're on a sick day is not abuse of employer trust — it's discretionary use of personal time while convalescing. What if she was watching Youtube on a laptop? Reading Das Kapital on a Kindle? The Kite Runner by candlelight? Who cares? Certainly not an employer, under normal circumstances — the person's not there, productivity is impacted, but the employee will be back tomorrow. However, if an employer is looking for a reason to fire an unwanted employee, (possibly one who takes lots of sick days?) the employer's sensibilities can suddenly become highly delicate.

    The story lacks much useful detail, though.

  2. Lawnix says:

    I agree with Tim that there must be more to this story. Surely any "abuse of trust" could not have arisen from this event alone. It could have been the straw that broke the camel's back. Perhaps this person has a very bad habit of calling in sick on days on the dates of major deadlines? We have no way of knowing.

    As for privacy, everyone should always remember that your employer can see everything you do on your computer at all times. If they really wanted to they could even capture everything your screen displays as a video file, or they could monitor what you can see in real time.

    That isn't really very likely, but what IS likely is that they will have a log of every url you access. They can easily store away all of the unencrypted data sent out from your computer – including all hotmail messages (and blog comments).

SlawTips      

SlawTips Top 10 Financial Errors: #8 Always Assume More Risk Than Needed
Friday, February 3

You should assess whether you can accept the financial risks associated with taking the matter, just as clients will assess whether they can (and will) pay your fee. Spend time at the beginning of the. […] »»

Practice

SlawTips Seeing New Federal Legislation
Wednesday, February 1

Today’s Tip is a simple reminder to view by “latest activity date”. The Parliament is back in session and those Slaw Tips readers for whom monitoring legislation is a regular … »»

Research

SlawTips Top 10 Financial Errors: #7 Put Off Dealing With Underperforming Lawyers
Friday, January 27

When everyone in the firm is required to report monthly to all other partners, you instill a culture in the firm that is self-correcting. If someone fails to regularly meet their financial goals, you. […] »»

Practice

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Banks and Banking - Liability of banks to third parties - Negligence - General

    The plaintiffs were the former shareholders of a company that failed. They sued the defendant bank alleging that it breached its contract with the company and the plaintiffs and breached a duty ...

  • Actions - Cause of action - General principles - New or extended cause of action - Opening of floodgates

    The plaintiff and defendant worked at different branches of the same bank. The defendant’s common-law husband was the plaintiff’s ex-husband. Over a four year period, the defendant ...

  • Aliens - Definitions and general principles - Immigration consultants

    The Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) had been designated as the sole regulatory body of immigration consultants in Canada from 2004 until June 2011. On June 30, 2011, Bill C-35 came into force, which significantly amended ...

  • Criminal Law - Sexual offences, public morals and disorderly conduct - Public morals - Obscenity - Possession of child pornography

    The accused was convicted of making child pornography available and two counts of possession of child pornography (see [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 197). Subsequently, he was sentenced ...

  • Criminal Law - Procedure - Charge or directions - Jury or judge alone - Directions regarding pleas or evidence of witnesses, co-accused and accomplices

    Rowe was convicted by a jury of five offences. He appealed.

    The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed ...

  • Narcotic Control - Offences - Possession - General

    The accused wished to access marijuana for medicinal purposes but did not have an authorization to possess marijuana issued under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations. He was notified that a package of marihuana addressed to him had been ...

  • Narcotic Control - General - Legislation - Exemptions - Medicinal marijuana

    McCrady, who had an application pending under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) to possess and grow marijuana, was convicted of possession of marijuana (Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), s. 4(1)). Hearn pleaded guilty ...

  • Criminal Law - Sentence - Trafficking in hashish or marijuana (incl. possession for purposes of trafficking)

    The accused pleaded guilty to one count of possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking. He was sentenced to 30 days’ imprisonment to be served intermittently and 11 months’ ...

  • Municipal Law - Powers of municipalities - Particular powers - Imposition and collection of taxes or fees 

    Catalyst Paper Corp. operated a paper mill in the District of North Cowichan. Catalyst objected to the tax rate that it paid compared to residential ratepayers. In 2009, the ...


law foundation icon

The re-development
of Slaw is assisted by
a grant from the
Law Foundation of Ontario

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.

Switch to our mobile site