A woman in Switzerland working for Nationale Suisse told her employer she couldn't work at the computer, and had to stay home in the dark.

A fellow employee supposedly noticed her surfing on Facebook and reported her. And yes, it cost her the job.

The employee's quite plausible position was that she was surfing Facebook on her iPhone in bed. She also accused them of spying on her.

Most workers are becoming aware that privacy controls should be used to protect personal information, even from employers. And persons added as "friends" probably shouldn't include those that will try to get you fired.

Is the employer required to investigate how the employee was actually accessing Facebook? And if not, are these reasonably sufficient grounds for dismissal?

Considering the already low expectation of privacy of employees in the workplace, does this type of monitoring constitute an unreasonable intrusion?

Omar Ha-Redeye is a Toronto lawyer focusing on health law and reputation management. He has a background in Nuclear Medicine Technology, Health Management and Public Relations.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

2 Comments on “Facebook Surfing Cost Swiss Woman Her Job”

  1. Tim B says:

    If this is a completely isolated incident between this employer and employee then I would suggest that she might have grounds for wrongful dismissal (in Canada). However, the facts in the story are so thin that I am assuming there's more to it: There's "abuse of trust", and there's abuse of trust, and even a bank can tell the difference.

    Browsing the web at home when you're on a sick day is not abuse of employer trust — it's discretionary use of personal time while convalescing. What if she was watching Youtube on a laptop? Reading Das Kapital on a Kindle? The Kite Runner by candlelight? Who cares? Certainly not an employer, under normal circumstances — the person's not there, productivity is impacted, but the employee will be back tomorrow. However, if an employer is looking for a reason to fire an unwanted employee, (possibly one who takes lots of sick days?) the employer's sensibilities can suddenly become highly delicate.

    The story lacks much useful detail, though.

  2. Lawnix says:

    I agree with Tim that there must be more to this story. Surely any "abuse of trust" could not have arisen from this event alone. It could have been the straw that broke the camel's back. Perhaps this person has a very bad habit of calling in sick on days on the dates of major deadlines? We have no way of knowing.

    As for privacy, everyone should always remember that your employer can see everything you do on your computer at all times. If they really wanted to they could even capture everything your screen displays as a video file, or they could monitor what you can see in real time.

    That isn't really very likely, but what IS likely is that they will have a log of every url you access. They can easily store away all of the unencrypted data sent out from your computer – including all hotmail messages (and blog comments).

SlawTips      

SlawTips Cash Flow Reports – Part 1
Thursday, May 17

Following on our earlier Top 10 Financial Errors posts, this is the first in a series of 10 posts dealing with Cash Flow Reports and in particular, cash flow management.… »»

Practice

SlawTips Just the Facts
Wednesday, May 16

Today’s research tip is about facts. When research is assigned to juniors (and librarians for that matter) it is important to share facts that are critical to the research. It … »»

Research

SlawTips Minimize That Darn Office Ribbon for More Room on Your Desktop
Wednesday, May 16

If you are using Office 2007 or 2010, The Ribbon is now a part of your life. Some of you will be happy about this – some of you won’t.… »»

Technology

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Aliens - Exclusion and expulsion - Power to detain and deport - Minister’s certificate - Review - Evidence

    In 2002, Harkat was detained pursuant to a ministerial security certificate issued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) as a person inadmissible to Canada on grounds ...

  • Contracts - Formation of contract - Signing - Electronic signature

    The plaintiff expressed an interest in purchasing the defendant’s (vendor’s) condo. The parties agreed to carry on their discussions through e-mail. Following an exchange of e-mails, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was contractually bound to ...

  • Barristers and Solicitors - Relationship with client - Confidential communications - General

    The petitioner was a Receiver appointed in March 2009 by a California court over the assets of GJB Enterprises Inc. (a “Ponzi scheme”) and its principals, the Berkes (the GJB parties). The court ordered ...

  • Practice - Costs - Funding before judgment - When interim or advance costs available

    The plaintiffs were “direct to home” satellite based subscription program providers. Rex and other defendants offered “grey market” services to Canadian residents to facilitate the unauthorized reception in Canada of the plaintiffs’ ...

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.