<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neuroenhancers and Lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slaw.ca/2009/04/27/neuroenhancers-and-lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/04/27/neuroenhancers-and-lawyers/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s online legal magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward King</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/04/27/neuroenhancers-and-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-704358</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=8295#comment-704358</guid>
		<description>how many litigators are already using beta blockers?  If the neuroenhancers provide an edge and are proven to be worth the side-effect risk, you can be sure that lawyers will be lining up like cyclists lining up for EPO.  It&#039;s not necessarily a bad thing--I&#039;m pretty sure that coffee is a neuroenhancer and I don&#039;t think I&#039;m ready to trade it for exercise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how many litigators are already using beta blockers?  If the neuroenhancers provide an edge and are proven to be worth the side-effect risk, you can be sure that lawyers will be lining up like cyclists lining up for EPO.  It&#039;s not necessarily a bad thing&#8211;I&#039;m pretty sure that coffee is a neuroenhancer and I don&#039;t think I&#039;m ready to trade it for exercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawnix</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/04/27/neuroenhancers-and-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-704344</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawnix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=8295#comment-704344</guid>
		<description>&quot;If we eventually decide that neuroenhancers work, and are basically safe, will we one day enforce their use? Lawmakers might compel certain workers—emergency-room doctors, air-traffic controllers—to take them.&quot;

I doubt it - regular exercise and a healthy diet achieve the same effects and they are not required by law. Then again we are talking about lawmakers here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;If we eventually decide that neuroenhancers work, and are basically safe, will we one day enforce their use? Lawmakers might compel certain workers—emergency-room doctors, air-traffic controllers—to take them.&#034;</p>
<p>I doubt it &#8211; regular exercise and a healthy diet achieve the same effects and they are not required by law. Then again we are talking about lawmakers here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.slaw.ca/2009/04/27/neuroenhancers-and-lawyers/feed/ ) in 0.36577 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 11:53 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:53 am UTC -->
