<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link rot in court decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slaw.ca/2009/05/07/link-rot-in-court-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/05/07/link-rot-in-court-decisions/</link>
	<description>A Canadian cooperative weblog on all things legal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:07:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/05/07/link-rot-in-court-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-704503</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=8471#comment-704503</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard the argument a number of times that this is why citing to electronic publications is not a good idea. I&#039;ve never really bought that argument, but this kind of number really gives me pause.

The librarians I know are always worrying about this kind of thing, too, suggesting that the lack of a stable system (whether its a unified national system or a decentralized, library-based archival system, perhaps) will cause more and more trouble going forward.

I don&#039;t think this issue is something that has been adequately addressed as yet as we transition away from relatively stable print media (which can be spread out as well geographically). I&#039;ll be curious to see where we are on this in another 10 years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard the argument a number of times that this is why citing to electronic publications is not a good idea. I&#8217;ve never really bought that argument, but this kind of number really gives me pause.</p>
<p>The librarians I know are always worrying about this kind of thing, too, suggesting that the lack of a stable system (whether its a unified national system or a decentralized, library-based archival system, perhaps) will cause more and more trouble going forward.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this issue is something that has been adequately addressed as yet as we transition away from relatively stable print media (which can be spread out as well geographically). I&#8217;ll be curious to see where we are on this in another 10 years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/05/07/link-rot-in-court-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-704480</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=8471#comment-704480</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, and a really great idea for further investigation, Shaunna. I suspect that most of the broken links will prove to be to government documents or to the websites of particular courts/tribunals. This highlights the need for a stable national repository for government publications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, and a really great idea for further investigation, Shaunna. I suspect that most of the broken links will prove to be to government documents or to the websites of particular courts/tribunals. This highlights the need for a stable national repository for government publications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
