<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Facebook Evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slaw.ca/2009/05/12/more-on-facebook-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/05/12/more-on-facebook-evidence/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s online legal magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam Egan</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/05/12/more-on-facebook-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-704642</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam Egan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=8593#comment-704642</guid>
		<description>I wonder why judges are &quot;ordering&quot; people to turn over this information.  I think the system would be better for all involved parties if the responsibility lied with the attorneys to find a Facebook &quot;friend&quot; willing to testify against someone and provide them with enough monetary incentive to actually get them to do it.

I don&#039;t like that judges are unnecessarily circumventing this option via totalitarian orders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why judges are &#034;ordering&#034; people to turn over this information.  I think the system would be better for all involved parties if the responsibility lied with the attorneys to find a Facebook &#034;friend&#034; willing to testify against someone and provide them with enough monetary incentive to actually get them to do it.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t like that judges are unnecessarily circumventing this option via totalitarian orders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Rouben</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/05/12/more-on-facebook-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-704599</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Rouben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=8593#comment-704599</guid>
		<description>Well stated. This issue is bound to come up with increasing frequency. In bringing a legal action, a party impliedly surrenders privacy over information that can be considered relevant to the action. It&#039;s really no different than medical records which would otherwise be private but which must be produced in a personal injury claim. The difficulty with Facebook is sorting out what is relevant - see &lt;a href=&quot;http://allanrouben.com/blog/?p=32&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://allanrouben.com/blog/?p=32&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well stated. This issue is bound to come up with increasing frequency. In bringing a legal action, a party impliedly surrenders privacy over information that can be considered relevant to the action. It&#039;s really no different than medical records which would otherwise be private but which must be produced in a personal injury claim. The difficulty with Facebook is sorting out what is relevant &#8211; see <a href="http://allanrouben.com/blog/?p=32">http://allanrouben.com/blog/?p=32</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.slaw.ca/2009/05/12/more-on-facebook-evidence/feed/ ) in 0.36727 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 11:37 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:37 am UTC -->
