<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panel on Pension Plan Reform at Western Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slaw.ca/2009/10/11/panel-on-pension-plan-reform-at-western-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/10/11/panel-on-pension-plan-reform-at-western-law/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s online legal magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:30:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MITCHELL, David A.</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/10/11/panel-on-pension-plan-reform-at-western-law/comment-page-1/#comment-709142</link>
		<dc:creator>MITCHELL, David A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=13216#comment-709142</guid>
		<description>I am a CEGEP teacher still teaching full time at age 79, going on 80.  I should like to retire as many of my colleagues have done and are doing.  Regrettably Dawson College and The Dawson Teachers&#039; Union subscribe to the idea that one cannot be a member of our Pension Plan after age 69 although there is no age limiton teaching in Quebec.  This means that I was able only to acquire 26 years before 1999, the year I turned 69.  Consequently I cannot afford to retire.  The only excuse I have been given is, &quot;You are too OLD.&quot;  CARRA and RREGOP are insensitive to say the least and cruel in their responses, where their Anglophobia is hardly concealed.
What is the value of Quebec and Canada both having clauses against AGEISM?  I doubt so much absolutely nothing would be done if it were a matter of anti-FEMINISM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a CEGEP teacher still teaching full time at age 79, going on 80.  I should like to retire as many of my colleagues have done and are doing.  Regrettably Dawson College and The Dawson Teachers&#039; Union subscribe to the idea that one cannot be a member of our Pension Plan after age 69 although there is no age limiton teaching in Quebec.  This means that I was able only to acquire 26 years before 1999, the year I turned 69.  Consequently I cannot afford to retire.  The only excuse I have been given is, &#034;You are too OLD.&#034;  CARRA and RREGOP are insensitive to say the least and cruel in their responses, where their Anglophobia is hardly concealed.<br />
What is the value of Quebec and Canada both having clauses against AGEISM?  I doubt so much absolutely nothing would be done if it were a matter of anti-FEMINISM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.slaw.ca/2009/10/11/panel-on-pension-plan-reform-at-western-law/feed/ ) in 0.37211 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 10:43 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 11:43 pm UTC -->
