ontario_ombudsman_banner

Ombudsmen are a rather strange breed of public official –- we have very robust investigative powers, such as the ability to examine witnesses under oath and to gain entry into government premises. But we have no powers of enforcement. We cannot impose a solution or make our recommendations binding.

Nevertheless, we can recommend resolutions, not only to address individual grievances, but also to promote broad policy changes. In this way, we have the potential to positively affect thousands -– even millions –- of citizens.

Our key to success is the use of moral suasion -– persuading our governments to do the right thing. To do this, we must maintain high standards of independent investigation and speak out publicly about our findings.

When I became the sixth Ombudsman of Ontario on April 1, 2005, my office had narrowly escaped the chopping block of government cost-cutters. The office had been flying under the radar for far too long, shying away from the public eye.

I immediately set out to establish an office that would deliver big value on a small budget. We created the Special Ombudsman Response Team (SORT) to conduct systemic investigations into high-profile issues with a potential for broad public policy impact. Many of SORT’s investigations, such as probes of the Ontario lottery system and the province’s newborn screening program, have resulted in major reforms. This benefits the province as a whole –- it demonstrates to citizens that their government cares.

University of Ottawa management professor Gilles Paquet has urged ombudsmen to modernize their approach along these lines. In an article published this month in Optimum: The Journal of Public Sector Management Prof. Paquet argues that ombudsmen need to tackle the issues revealed in the complaints we investigate

with an explicit intention to unearth and expose the source of the problem, and to become the architect of better governance arrangements capable of eradicating the cause of the difficulties.

This is our inspiration for Good Governance Week –- to strive to elevate the role of ombudsman from a mere complaints department to an “architect of better governance.”


[click on the author's name for more information]

up

One Comment on “The Ombudsman as “Architect of Better Governance””

  1. As a Ontarian, I appreciate the millions of tax dollars saved through your efforts, and those of your staff. Thank-you.

SlawTips      

SlawTips Cash Flow Reports – Part 1
Thursday, May 17

Following on our earlier Top 10 Financial Errors posts, this is the first in a series of 10 posts dealing with Cash Flow Reports and in particular, cash flow management.… »»

Practice

SlawTips Just the Facts
Wednesday, May 16

Today’s research tip is about facts. When research is assigned to juniors (and librarians for that matter) it is important to share facts that are critical to the research. It … »»

Research

SlawTips Minimize That Darn Office Ribbon for More Room on Your Desktop
Wednesday, May 16

If you are using Office 2007 or 2010, The Ribbon is now a part of your life. Some of you will be happy about this – some of you won’t.… »»

Technology

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Aliens - Exclusion and expulsion - Power to detain and deport - Minister’s certificate - Review - Evidence

    In 2002, Harkat was detained pursuant to a ministerial security certificate issued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) as a person inadmissible to Canada on grounds ...

  • Contracts - Formation of contract - Signing - Electronic signature

    The plaintiff expressed an interest in purchasing the defendant’s (vendor’s) condo. The parties agreed to carry on their discussions through e-mail. Following an exchange of e-mails, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was contractually bound to ...

  • Barristers and Solicitors - Relationship with client - Confidential communications - General

    The petitioner was a Receiver appointed in March 2009 by a California court over the assets of GJB Enterprises Inc. (a “Ponzi scheme”) and its principals, the Berkes (the GJB parties). The court ordered ...

  • Practice - Costs - Funding before judgment - When interim or advance costs available

    The plaintiffs were “direct to home” satellite based subscription program providers. Rex and other defendants offered “grey market” services to Canadian residents to facilitate the unauthorized reception in Canada of the plaintiffs’ ...

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.