<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wanted: A Synopsis of Canadian Cybersecurity Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slaw.ca/2009/11/05/wanted-a-synopsis-of-canadian-cybersecurity-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/11/05/wanted-a-synopsis-of-canadian-cybersecurity-laws/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s online legal magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Allsebrook</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/11/05/wanted-a-synopsis-of-canadian-cybersecurity-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-708126</link>
		<dc:creator>David Allsebrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=13945#comment-708126</guid>
		<description>Have a look at sections 273.1 through 273.8 of the National Defense Act. Among other things, it establishes the Canadian Security Establishment, and the Minister of Defense&#039;s power to order it to sweep the &quot;global information infrastructure&quot; for &quot;foreign intelligence&quot;. CSE cannot listen to people in Canada, but in practice if they want to know what is going on here, CSE asks the Americans or the Brits, and vice versa.  This pooling arrangement includes Australia,Japan and South Korea, and has been in place under the name &quot;Echelon&quot; since 1947.
  The Minister may also authorize his IT people &quot;to intercept private communications in relation to an activity or class of activities specified in the authorization, if such communications originate from, are directed to or transit through any such computer system or network, in the course of and for the sole purpose of identifying, isolating or preventing any harmful unauthorized use of, any interference with or any damage to those systems or networks, or any damage to the data that they contain.&quot; 273.8(1)
There is more in the Act, from search and seizure powers on military bases to legalized hacking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a look at sections 273.1 through 273.8 of the National Defense Act. Among other things, it establishes the Canadian Security Establishment, and the Minister of Defense&#039;s power to order it to sweep the &#034;global information infrastructure&#034; for &#034;foreign intelligence&#034;. CSE cannot listen to people in Canada, but in practice if they want to know what is going on here, CSE asks the Americans or the Brits, and vice versa.  This pooling arrangement includes Australia,Japan and South Korea, and has been in place under the name &#034;Echelon&#034; since 1947.<br />
  The Minister may also authorize his IT people &#034;to intercept private communications in relation to an activity or class of activities specified in the authorization, if such communications originate from, are directed to or transit through any such computer system or network, in the course of and for the sole purpose of identifying, isolating or preventing any harmful unauthorized use of, any interference with or any damage to those systems or networks, or any damage to the data that they contain.&#034; 273.8(1)<br />
There is more in the Act, from search and seizure powers on military bases to legalized hacking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Bueckert</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/11/05/wanted-a-synopsis-of-canadian-cybersecurity-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-708109</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Bueckert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=13945#comment-708109</guid>
		<description>In the criminal law sphere, the best resource I know of on this subject is the looseleaf by Robert W Hubbard, Peter M. Brauti, Scott K. Fenton on &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canadalawbook.ca/catalogue_detail.cfm?ProductID=191&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wiretapping and Other Electronic Surveillance: Law and Procedure&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; (Aurora: Canada Law Book, 2009).  I believe it was first published in 2000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the criminal law sphere, the best resource I know of on this subject is the looseleaf by Robert W Hubbard, Peter M. Brauti, Scott K. Fenton on <em><a href="http://www.canadalawbook.ca/catalogue_detail.cfm?ProductID=191">Wiretapping and Other Electronic Surveillance: Law and Procedure</a></em> (Aurora: Canada Law Book, 2009).  I believe it was first published in 2000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peg Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/11/05/wanted-a-synopsis-of-canadian-cybersecurity-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-708106</link>
		<dc:creator>Peg Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=13945#comment-708106</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Michael Geist might know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Michael Geist might know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.slaw.ca/2009/11/05/wanted-a-synopsis-of-canadian-cybersecurity-laws/feed/ ) in 0.36980 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 1:10 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 2:10 am UTC -->
