«« older

newer »»

author photo

November 11, 2009

David CantonDavid Canton is a business lawyer and trade-mark agent with Harrison Pensa LLP in London, Ontario. David's practice focuses on technology issues and technology companies. David is co-author of Legal Land Mines in E-Commerce published by McGraw-Hill, writes a weekly column on Today’s Business Law for the London Free Press and the Canoe.ca Technology news, and blogs at canton.elegal.ca. 
[click on the author's name for more information]

Brand Promise – It’s Not a Bag of Hair

Conventional wisdom is that law firm web sites should contain a list of major deals the firm has worked on. I’ve always thought that was wrong – but didn’t really understand why until this morning.

I attended a TechAlliance breakfast club seminar where Nick Hall of Hall Associates ( @hallassociates ) spoke about Brand Promise.

One of the examples he used was a hairdresser. The brand experience a good hairdresser provides is confidence – not a haircut. Confidence that the hairdresser uses her/his expertise to make the customer look and thus feel good. That results in loyal customers who will come back and refer others.

If it was just about experience, a hairdresser would line their walls with bags of hair they had cut.

Law firm web sites listing all the deals they have done is like displaying bags of hair.

Respond: make a comment | read the 2 comments

Share: Email | Save as PDF | Print | Bookmark & Share

More: in Miscellaneous | from David Canton

up

2 Comments on “Brand Promise – It’s Not a Bag of Hair”

  1. DC says:
    November 11, 2009 at 11:56 am

    I respectfully disagree with your analogy.

    Clients want to see what deals you have done because they want to know that you have handled clients in the same industry (read: you know our particular issues, and our savvy competitors have already placed their trust in you), deals in the same geography (read: you know local issues and law), and deals of the same size and complexity (read: you have the experience/expertise) – because they don’t want to have to pay for you to get up to speed. Under your analogy, law firms would post deal documents, the equivalent of your “bags of hair” – clearly not done.

  2. John G says:
    November 11, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    I disagree as well. The list of deals would be like a row of pictures of coiffures for which the hairdresser was personally responsible. The law firms’ equivalent to bags of hair might be bags of money … which would have a certain appeal, but (a) the hair is taken away to create the coiffure, while the money is produced by the deals, and (b) the partners take the bags of money home (so I’m told).

    I presume the clients consent to the mention of their deals on their law firms’ web sites, since lawyers aren’t otherwise allowed to talk about who they represent. Why would clients want to appear on such a list? Do they derive prestige from choosing a law firm that all those other fancy folks also chose?

Make a comment:

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice.

Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.

Switch to our mobile site