<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fore!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slaw.ca/2009/11/20/fore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/11/20/fore/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s online legal magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cheifetz</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/11/20/fore/comment-page-1/#comment-708818</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cheifetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=14287#comment-708818</guid>
		<description>By the way, the trial judgment was recently affirmed: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canlii.org/en/ns/nsca/doc/2009/2009nsca113/2009nsca113.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hayter v. Bezanson, 2009 NSCA 113 (CanLII&lt;/a&gt;). One of the comments made by the court, in dismissing the defendent&#039;s appeal was: &quot;An appeal isn’t a mulligan for the facts.&quot;

Don&#039;t blame me. I didn&#039;t write the thing. 

Besides, I&#039;ve my own issues with NS judges. Some years back, one of them referred to an article I&#039;d written as &quot;complete, if not overly analytical&quot;. I think he meant &quot;too analytical&quot; not, &quot;not analytical enough&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, the trial judgment was recently affirmed: <a href="http://www.canlii.org/en/ns/nsca/doc/2009/2009nsca113/2009nsca113.html">Hayter v. Bezanson, 2009 NSCA 113 (CanLII</a>). One of the comments made by the court, in dismissing the defendent&#039;s appeal was: &#034;An appeal isn’t a mulligan for the facts.&#034;</p>
<p>Don&#039;t blame me. I didn&#039;t write the thing. </p>
<p>Besides, I&#039;ve my own issues with NS judges. Some years back, one of them referred to an article I&#039;d written as &#034;complete, if not overly analytical&#034;. I think he meant &#034;too analytical&#034; not, &#034;not analytical enough&#034;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cheifetz</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/11/20/fore/comment-page-1/#comment-708816</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cheifetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=14287#comment-708816</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/11/24/a-post-about-beer-golf-pot-hollywood-and-canadian-tort-law/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wall Street Journal Law Blog&lt;/a&gt; links to Mark&#039;s post. Mention Slaw, too, as &quot;the Slaw&quot;: &quot;Click here for more on the case, from the Slaw — a Canadian law blog.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/11/24/a-post-about-beer-golf-pot-hollywood-and-canadian-tort-law/">Wall Street Journal Law Blog</a> links to Mark&#039;s post. Mention Slaw, too, as &#034;the Slaw&#034;: &#034;Click here for more on the case, from the Slaw — a Canadian law blog.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Fodden</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2009/11/20/fore/comment-page-1/#comment-708533</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Fodden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=14287#comment-708533</guid>
		<description>France&#039;s Thierry Henry may not have &quot;taken a run at it,&quot; à la Happy Gilmore, but he definitely &quot;gave it a hand.&quot; I wonder whether we&#039;ll get to see a judge somewhere opine on the standard of care owed to soccer players -- and fans -- world wide. There&#039;s a nice piece on &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.golf.com/presstent/2009/11/harrington-golfers-dont-cheat-unlike-french-soccer-players.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Golf.com&lt;/a&gt; about the contrast between the ethics (soi-disant) of soccer and those of golf; it&#039;s by an Irishman, of course. If you haven&#039;t seen Thierry&#039;s unorthodox play, there&#039;s a decent video at: http://bit.ly/p6qUu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>France&#039;s Thierry Henry may not have &#034;taken a run at it,&#034; à la Happy Gilmore, but he definitely &#034;gave it a hand.&#034; I wonder whether we&#039;ll get to see a judge somewhere opine on the standard of care owed to soccer players &#8212; and fans &#8212; world wide. There&#039;s a nice piece on <a href="http://blogs.golf.com/presstent/2009/11/harrington-golfers-dont-cheat-unlike-french-soccer-players.html">Golf.com</a> about the contrast between the ethics (soi-disant) of soccer and those of golf; it&#039;s by an Irishman, of course. If you haven&#039;t seen Thierry&#039;s unorthodox play, there&#039;s a decent video at: <a href="http://bit.ly/p6qUu">http://bit.ly/p6qUu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.slaw.ca/2009/11/20/fore/feed/ ) in 0.34838 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 11:07 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 12:07 pm UTC -->
