We might be used to seeing archived video footage of legal proceedings on the SCC site or through CPAC, but on YouTube?

Simon Fodden previous mentioned the initiative the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to upload the Proposition 8 appeal in Perry v. Schwarzenegger.

Well it seems that the objections aired over the broadcast have gained some support with a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The term court order issued today states,

…permitting real-time streaming is stayed except as it permits streaming to other rooms within the confines of the courthouse in which the trial is to be held.

The court also stayed other means of broadcast, presumably YouTube, pending further order.

However, Justice Stephen Breyer issued a dissent, citing Conkright v. Frommert, 556 U. S. ____ (2009), where the applicants also sought a stay of proceedings while they filed a petition for certiorari. The Court in Conkright stated,

Denial of such in-chambers stay applications is the norm; relief is granted only in “extraordinary cases.”

The test used in Conkright is:

  • a reasonable probability that a majority would grant certiorari
  • a fair prospect of success on the issue at appeal
  • a likelihood of irreparable harm from a denial

The irreparable harm component not terribly dissimilar from the test used for interlocutory injunctions in Canada in RJR-Macdonald. According to Justice Breyer, the likelihood of irreparable harm was low based on the submissions provided.

It does seem as if the California court has struggled over the issue even before today's order. You can see a test of the audio system on YouTube. And it looks like this open Request for Quotation which ended last week might relate to the same project.

The court has set up a dedicated webpage for documents related to the case which should include any further developments.

Omar Ha-Redeye is a Toronto lawyer focusing on health law and reputation management. He has a background in Nuclear Medicine Technology, Health Management and Public Relations.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

2 Comments on “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”

  1. Teddy Partridge is live-blogging it, and Dan Levine is tweeting. No stay for that at least.

  2. It's only a matter of time before those who transcribe the proceedings are just really good texters, on their cell phones.

SlawTips      

SlawTips Updated Version of Great Social Media Guide for Lawyers Released
Wednesday, May 23

Last spring, Meritas’ Leadership Institute released a Social Media Guide for Lawyers. This helpful resource provided lawyers with an overview of the three main social media tools — LinkedIn, Faceb. […] »»

Technology

SlawTips Cash Flow Reports – Part 1
Thursday, May 17

Following on our earlier Top 10 Financial Errors posts, this is the first in a series of 10 posts dealing with Cash Flow Reports and in particular, cash flow management.… »»

Practice

SlawTips Just the Facts
Wednesday, May 16

Today’s research tip is about facts. When research is assigned to juniors (and librarians for that matter) it is important to share facts that are critical to the research. It … »»

Research

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Aliens - Exclusion and expulsion - Power to detain and deport - Minister’s certificate - Review - Evidence

    In 2002, Harkat was detained pursuant to a ministerial security certificate issued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) as a person inadmissible to Canada on grounds ...

  • Contracts - Formation of contract - Signing - Electronic signature

    The plaintiff expressed an interest in purchasing the defendant’s (vendor’s) condo. The parties agreed to carry on their discussions through e-mail. Following an exchange of e-mails, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was contractually bound to ...

  • Barristers and Solicitors - Relationship with client - Confidential communications - General

    The petitioner was a Receiver appointed in March 2009 by a California court over the assets of GJB Enterprises Inc. (a “Ponzi scheme”) and its principals, the Berkes (the GJB parties). The court ordered ...

  • Practice - Costs - Funding before judgment - When interim or advance costs available

    The plaintiffs were “direct to home” satellite based subscription program providers. Rex and other defendants offered “grey market” services to Canadian residents to facilitate the unauthorized reception in Canada of the plaintiffs’ ...

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.