«« older | newer »»

author photo

March 1, 2010

John Gregory

Online Voting in Alberta or Elsewhere

According to a report by Richard Liebrecht of the QMI Agency:

Alberta Musing Online Election Voting
New election rules have cleared the way for Internet and electronic voting, which could come to Alberta as early as 2013. “Obviously that online voting is something that’s on the forefront of people’s minds … people say, ‘I can do my banking online, but I can’t do my voting online’,” said Brian Fjeldheim, Alberta’s Chief Electoral Officer.

The Chief Electoral Officer went on to say “Once it has been proven to be effective, that the votes can be certified, all that security stuff can be looked after, I certainly see that as something that’s coming.”

How easy is looking after “all that security stuff”?

Is the parallel between e-voting and e-banking valid?

A few years ago ("Electronic Voting and the Law") I suggested (unofficially, of course) a few reasons why Internet voting is not like Internet banking. Was I unduly pessimistic? Or are people in fact a bit too blasé about the security of e-banking?

[via Internet Law News]

John D. Gregory is an Ontario lawyer called in 1977, with a special interest in what happens to the law when you take the paper away. He works in civil justice law reform at the Ministry of the Attorney General, but his Slawian opinions are not necessarily those of the Ministry.
[click on the author's name for more information]

Respond: make a comment | read the 3 comments

Share: Email | Save as PDF | Print | Bookmark & Share | Clip to Evernote | Reader later on Instapaper

More: in Administration of Slaw or Substantive Law or Technology or ulc_ecomm_list | from

up

3 Comments on “Online Voting in Alberta or Elsewhere”

  1. Simon Fodden says:
    March 1, 2010 at 11:36 am

    Thanks to a member of John Gregory's ULC-ECOMM email list, the original source of this post, we have a link to the bill in question [PDF], and a link to the statement [DOC] in the legislature introducing the bill.

  2. Bradley Albrecht says:
    March 1, 2010 at 5:27 pm

    I think the comparison between voting and banking can only go so far. If someone's money went missing, they would notice. But how would you know if your vote went missing?

    Voting falls under the broad umbrella of "Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done." Even if (big if) an ideal, secure on-line system were available, its use would close an election off to meaningful popular scrutiny.

  3. Francis Barragan says:
    March 1, 2010 at 8:51 pm

    I may get burned someday on this, but I just don't see how this is feasible in the next 10 years at least. The public trust just won't be there until a long time. Even if the security means were perfect (paper polling is not perfect either, but that's another matter), the public trust in the process is essential and I can't see how it could be accomplished, at least in the near future.

SlawTips      

SlawTips Updated Version of Great Social Media Guide for Lawyers Released
Wednesday, May 23

Last spring, Meritas’ Leadership Institute released a Social Media Guide for Lawyers. This helpful resource provided lawyers with an overview of the three main social media tools — LinkedIn, Faceb. […] »»

Technology

SlawTips Cash Flow Reports – Part 1
Thursday, May 17

Following on our earlier Top 10 Financial Errors posts, this is the first in a series of 10 posts dealing with Cash Flow Reports and in particular, cash flow management.… »»

Practice

SlawTips Just the Facts
Wednesday, May 16

Today’s research tip is about facts. When research is assigned to juniors (and librarians for that matter) it is important to share facts that are critical to the research. It … »»

Research

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.
  • Harkat, Re 2012 FCA 122

    Aliens - Exclusion and expulsion - Power to detain and deport - Minister’s certificate - Review - Evidence

    In 2002, Harkat was detained pursuant to a ministerial security certificate issued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) as a person inadmissible to Canada on grounds ...

  • Girouard v. Druet 2012 NBCA 40

    Contracts - Formation of contract - Signing - Electronic signature

    The plaintiff expressed an interest in purchasing the defendant’s (vendor’s) condo. The parties agreed to carry on their discussions through e-mail. Following an exchange of e-mails, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was contractually bound to ...

  • Donell et al. v. GJB Enterprises Inc. et al. 2012 BCCA 135

    Barristers and Solicitors - Relationship with client - Confidential communications - General

    The petitioner was a Receiver appointed in March 2009 by a California court over the assets of GJB Enterprises Inc. (a “Ponzi scheme”) and its principals, the Berkes (the GJB parties). The court ordered ...

  • Dish Network L.L.C. et al. v. Rex et al. 2012 BCCA 161

    Practice - Costs - Funding before judgment - When interim or advance costs available

    The plaintiffs were “direct to home” satellite based subscription program providers. Rex and other defendants offered “grey market” services to Canadian residents to facilitate the unauthorized reception in Canada of the plaintiffs’ ...

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.