<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Negative Reviews Can Be Good for Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slaw.ca/2010/03/03/negative-reviews-can-be-good-for-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2010/03/03/negative-reviews-can-be-good-for-business/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s online legal magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:30:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie Crosby</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2010/03/03/negative-reviews-can-be-good-for-business/comment-page-1/#comment-728626</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=18136#comment-728626</guid>
		<description>I agree some negative commentary can lend an air of openness and legitimacy. If all comments on a site are positive and supportive, people often make the assumption that many of those comments were somehow planted there by the organization itself. Letting negative comments stand (as long as they are not hate-mongering or &quot;trolling&quot;), and responding to them in an open manner, help to demonstrate honesty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree some negative commentary can lend an air of openness and legitimacy. If all comments on a site are positive and supportive, people often make the assumption that many of those comments were somehow planted there by the organization itself. Letting negative comments stand (as long as they are not hate-mongering or &#034;trolling&#034;), and responding to them in an open manner, help to demonstrate honesty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Ha-Redeye</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2010/03/03/negative-reviews-can-be-good-for-business/comment-page-1/#comment-728623</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Ha-Redeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=18136#comment-728623</guid>
		<description>Too bad I missed the presentation.  I haven&#039;t caught Mitch speaking in some time, probably since I started law school, and I should have tried harder when he came to town.

Online reviews will continue to be a contentious issue in &lt;a href=&quot;http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article7045977.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;online reputation management&lt;/a&gt;.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slaw.ca/2009/10/13/doctors-fight-back-against-reputations-on-ratemd/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;current case against Yelp &lt;/a&gt;raises additional questions of whether litigation is appropriate where a site requests compensation via advertising to bump down negative reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad I missed the presentation.  I haven&#039;t caught Mitch speaking in some time, probably since I started law school, and I should have tried harder when he came to town.</p>
<p>Online reviews will continue to be a contentious issue in <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article7045977.ece">online reputation management</a>.  The <a href="http://www.slaw.ca/2009/10/13/doctors-fight-back-against-reputations-on-ratemd/">current case against Yelp </a>raises additional questions of whether litigation is appropriate where a site requests compensation via advertising to bump down negative reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.slaw.ca/2010/03/03/negative-reviews-can-be-good-for-business/feed/ ) in 0.33668 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 9:55 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 10:55 pm UTC -->
