Putting it out there can get you into trouble. Not only is there "publisher's remorse" but also the more serious take-down notice that may crash into your client's inbox from time to time claiming that the content of their web page has infringed one of the sender's rights. It's easy enough if the client owns the site to eliminate the offending material or whole pages; that's why delete buttons were made. But Google is not so easily deterred. Having indexed material it may continue to serve up links to that material, if only in its cache; and its bots may continue to worm their way into material that the client thought had been successfully hidden.

What to do? Google's not exactly the corner store, where you can drop in and have a decent chat with the owner, and on their sites you'll notice a distinct lack of email addresses or phone numbers you can use to send them your problems.

Google knows it's a juggernaut (fun etymology in this case: "lord of the universe"). And eventually it provides.

Google's Webmaster Central Blog has released the first in a series of entries showing us how to pull our coals out of the fire: "URL removal explained, Part I: URLs & directories." I'm not going to try to reproduce their instructions here: it's not an occasion for approximation. But I can say that getting them to remove a URL involves essentially two steps: blocking their bots correctly, and then submitting the URL to their removal tool.

And because we sometimes make mistake upon mistake — or, more happily, you were able to defeat the take down notice — the client can undo the removal and re-instate the URL.

Simon Fodden is the founder of Slaw. He taught law at Osgoode Hall Law School for more than 30 years before he retired to focus on writing, publishing, and IT and law.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

3 Comments on “Removing Content From Google”

  1. Lawnix Law says:

    To use the Google URL removal feature you can either block the page with robots.txt or remove it. It may take a day or so for the page to be removed from the search index and it will likely continue to be shown by other search engines, however.

    Perhaps the best way to play it safe is to add a "noarchive" meta tag before publishing the content. The search engines will still show the page in search results but will not make a cached page available. You can then make the undesired content disappear (from the most common sources at least) the moment you remove the page or change its contents.

  2. Simon Fodden says:

    Thanks, Lawnix. Best, though, to read the Google page for the exact way to do it.

  3. Thanks for this link. I'll be looking for the sequels (I'm assuming there's at least a Part II).

    Still seems like removal is only possible through compliance of the domain owner, which still doesn't address SEO and reputation issues.

    What I'm interested in seeing is if a court can compel a domain owner to block bots. Does anyone know if this has happened before?

SlawTips      

SlawTips Use join.me to Get on the Same Page Across the Web
Wednesday, February 8

When you need to collaborate on a document displayed on your screen, it’s great to have a colleague from down the hall come into your office and look over your … »»

Technology

SlawTips Top 10 Financial Errors: #8 Always Assume More Risk Than Needed
Friday, February 3

You should assess whether you can accept the financial risks associated with taking the matter, just as clients will assess whether they can (and will) pay your fee. Spend time at the beginning of the. […] »»

Practice

SlawTips Seeing New Federal Legislation
Wednesday, February 1

Today’s Tip is a simple reminder to view by “latest activity date”. The Parliament is back in session and those Slaw Tips readers for whom monitoring legislation is a regular … »»

Research

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Banks and Banking - Liability of banks to third parties - Negligence - General

    The plaintiffs were the former shareholders of a company that failed. They sued the defendant bank alleging that it breached its contract with the company and the plaintiffs and breached a duty ...

  • Actions - Cause of action - General principles - New or extended cause of action - Opening of floodgates

    The plaintiff and defendant worked at different branches of the same bank. The defendant’s common-law husband was the plaintiff’s ex-husband. Over a four year period, the defendant ...

  • Aliens - Definitions and general principles - Immigration consultants

    The Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) had been designated as the sole regulatory body of immigration consultants in Canada from 2004 until June 2011. On June 30, 2011, Bill C-35 came into force, which significantly amended ...

  • Criminal Law - Sexual offences, public morals and disorderly conduct - Public morals - Obscenity - Possession of child pornography

    The accused was convicted of making child pornography available and two counts of possession of child pornography (see [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 197). Subsequently, he was sentenced ...

  • Criminal Law - Procedure - Charge or directions - Jury or judge alone - Directions regarding pleas or evidence of witnesses, co-accused and accomplices

    Rowe was convicted by a jury of five offences. He appealed.

    The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed ...

  • Narcotic Control - Offences - Possession - General

    The accused wished to access marijuana for medicinal purposes but did not have an authorization to possess marijuana issued under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations. He was notified that a package of marihuana addressed to him had been ...

  • Narcotic Control - General - Legislation - Exemptions - Medicinal marijuana

    McCrady, who had an application pending under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) to possess and grow marijuana, was convicted of possession of marijuana (Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), s. 4(1)). Hearn pleaded guilty ...

  • Criminal Law - Sentence - Trafficking in hashish or marijuana (incl. possession for purposes of trafficking)

    The accused pleaded guilty to one count of possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking. He was sentenced to 30 days’ imprisonment to be served intermittently and 11 months’ ...

  • Municipal Law - Powers of municipalities - Particular powers - Imposition and collection of taxes or fees 

    Catalyst Paper Corp. operated a paper mill in the District of North Cowichan. Catalyst objected to the tax rate that it paid compared to residential ratepayers. In 2009, the ...


law foundation icon

The re-development
of Slaw is assisted by
a grant from the
Law Foundation of Ontario

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.

Switch to our mobile site