Putting it out there can get you into trouble. Not only is there "publisher's remorse" but also the more serious take-down notice that may crash into your client's inbox from time to time claiming that the content of their web page has infringed one of the sender's rights. It's easy enough if the client owns the site to eliminate the offending material or whole pages; that's why delete buttons were made. But Google is not so easily deterred. Having indexed material it may continue to serve up links to that material, if only in its cache; and its bots may continue to worm their way into material that the client thought had been successfully hidden.

What to do? Google's not exactly the corner store, where you can drop in and have a decent chat with the owner, and on their sites you'll notice a distinct lack of email addresses or phone numbers you can use to send them your problems.

Google knows it's a juggernaut (fun etymology in this case: "lord of the universe"). And eventually it provides.

Google's Webmaster Central Blog has released the first in a series of entries showing us how to pull our coals out of the fire: "URL removal explained, Part I: URLs & directories." I'm not going to try to reproduce their instructions here: it's not an occasion for approximation. But I can say that getting them to remove a URL involves essentially two steps: blocking their bots correctly, and then submitting the URL to their removal tool.

And because we sometimes make mistake upon mistake — or, more happily, you were able to defeat the take down notice — the client can undo the removal and re-instate the URL.

Simon Fodden is the founder of Slaw. He taught law at Osgoode Hall Law School for more than 30 years before he retired to focus on writing, publishing, and IT and law.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

3 Comments on “Removing Content From Google”

  1. Lawnix Law says:

    To use the Google URL removal feature you can either block the page with robots.txt or remove it. It may take a day or so for the page to be removed from the search index and it will likely continue to be shown by other search engines, however.

    Perhaps the best way to play it safe is to add a "noarchive" meta tag before publishing the content. The search engines will still show the page in search results but will not make a cached page available. You can then make the undesired content disappear (from the most common sources at least) the moment you remove the page or change its contents.

  2. Simon Fodden says:

    Thanks, Lawnix. Best, though, to read the Google page for the exact way to do it.

  3. Thanks for this link. I'll be looking for the sequels (I'm assuming there's at least a Part II).

    Still seems like removal is only possible through compliance of the domain owner, which still doesn't address SEO and reputation issues.

    What I'm interested in seeing is if a court can compel a domain owner to block bots. Does anyone know if this has happened before?

SlawTips      

SlawTips Updated Version of Great Social Media Guide for Lawyers Released
Wednesday, May 23

Last spring, Meritas’ Leadership Institute released a Social Media Guide for Lawyers. This helpful resource provided lawyers with an overview of the three main social media tools — LinkedIn, Faceb. […] »»

Technology

SlawTips Cash Flow Reports – Part 1
Thursday, May 17

Following on our earlier Top 10 Financial Errors posts, this is the first in a series of 10 posts dealing with Cash Flow Reports and in particular, cash flow management.… »»

Practice

SlawTips Just the Facts
Wednesday, May 16

Today’s research tip is about facts. When research is assigned to juniors (and librarians for that matter) it is important to share facts that are critical to the research. It … »»

Research

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Aliens - Exclusion and expulsion - Power to detain and deport - Minister’s certificate - Review - Evidence

    In 2002, Harkat was detained pursuant to a ministerial security certificate issued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) as a person inadmissible to Canada on grounds ...

  • Contracts - Formation of contract - Signing - Electronic signature

    The plaintiff expressed an interest in purchasing the defendant’s (vendor’s) condo. The parties agreed to carry on their discussions through e-mail. Following an exchange of e-mails, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was contractually bound to ...

  • Barristers and Solicitors - Relationship with client - Confidential communications - General

    The petitioner was a Receiver appointed in March 2009 by a California court over the assets of GJB Enterprises Inc. (a “Ponzi scheme”) and its principals, the Berkes (the GJB parties). The court ordered ...

  • Practice - Costs - Funding before judgment - When interim or advance costs available

    The plaintiffs were “direct to home” satellite based subscription program providers. Rex and other defendants offered “grey market” services to Canadian residents to facilitate the unauthorized reception in Canada of the plaintiffs’ ...

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.