A Patent Prosecution Highway ("PPH") program was implemented between the Canadian and US patent offices in 2008 to accelerate patent examination and issuance. Under the PPH, an applicant with allowable claims in either a US or Canadian patent application may request that the other country's patent office provide a fast track examination to the corresponding application. The sharing of search and examination results between offices is intended to expedite and improve the quality of examination.

As an example of how the PPH works, if a US patent application is examined and claims are approved as patentable ("allowable") by the US Patent Office ("USPTO") the patent applicant can then use the PPH to request accelerated examination of the corresponding patent application in the Canadian Patent Office ("CPO"). US examination reports generated by the USPTO are submitted to the CPO examiner for review. The patent applicant must also align the unexamined Canadian patent application claims to be very similar or identical to the allowable US claims. The similarity requirement for the PPH claims facilitates the Canadian examiner's review of the US search results and examination reports. The time to patent issuance in Canada can be reduced from years to months in some cases. As well, it is hoped that the patenting process becomes cheaper in Canada, provided that the Canadian examiner views patentability the same as the US examiner and does not make a lot of significant new objections. In circumstances where allowable Canadian claims are obtained before the US patent application is examined, then expedited PPH examination may be requested in the US. Certain other qualifications must also be met, which are not discussed in detail here.

The traffic flow trends at the USPTO and CPO have been consistent since the start of the PPH pilot program: PPH traffic flows heavily into the CPO and slowly into the USPTO. To date, the CPO has received 898 requests to expedite examination under the PPH. In sharp contrast, the USPTO has received 29 PPH requests under the PPH program (as of the end of March 2010). This difference is not unexpected since US patents are often examined and granted before examination is initiated in Canada. This is in part due to the Canadian patent system allowing applicants to delay examination for up to 5 years from the application filing date. The uneven traffic is also partly due to PPH requirements that Canadian patent applications cannot proceed via the US PPH system if they are based on a patent application that was first-filed in the US (many Canadian patent owners file in the US first because it is a major market). We think this restriction on PPH access should be removed.

The Canada-US PPH is currently running as a pilot program until 2011. The program was already extended once and we see no reason why it would not be extended again. In Fall 2009, Canada established similar PPH pilot programs with Japan, Korea and Denmark, which indicates that the Canadian government believes that the PPH concept is beneficial and should be expanded. The Canadian PPH pilot programs with Japan, Denmark and Korea will run until at least September 30, 2011. To date, the CPO has received 3 requests to expedite examination based on Japanese patent applications. No requests have been received yet in respect of Danish or Korean applications.

The PPH provides a useful tool in the patent applicant's toolkit. It is not appropriate or applicable for all Canadian patent applications; however, it should be kept in mind at the outset of planning a patent strategy.

Noel Courage, B.Sc. (Biochem.), LL.B. is a partner in Bereskin & Parr LLP. His practice focuses on the patenting and licensing of chemical, biotechnological and pharmaceutical inventions. Louisa Pontrelli, B.Sc., M.Sc. (Clin. Biochem.), LL.B. is an associate with Bereskin & Parr LLP. Her practice focuses on biotechnology and pharmaceutical matters, including patents, licensing, and related litigation. She is also a member of the firm's Litigation Practice and is involved in cases relating to life sciences.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

Comments are closed.

SlawTips      

SlawTips Good Communications = Satisfied Clients
Thursday, February 23

As Richard Ferguson, a lawyer friend of ours says on his email message: “People may forget what you said…. People may forget what you did…. but people will never forget … »»

Practice

SlawTips Current Awareness
Wednesday, February 22

There are two possible approaches to personal current awareness: Develop excellent searching skills so that you can find what you need when you need it Pick a fairly narrow specialty … »»

Research

SlawTips Top 10 Financial Errors: #10 Rely on the Lottery for Your Partnership Retirement Plan
Thursday, February 16

“It is better to have a permanent income than to be fascinating” was said once by Oscar Wilde. The final tip in this series is the capstone issue in our … »»

Practice

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Limitation of Actions - Actions in contract - Actions for debt - General

    Moody died on December 3, 2005, leaving four adult children. Pursuant to Moody’s will two of her children, James and Tyrell, were appointed executors of the estate. It was alleged that, during her ...

  • Barristers and Solicitors - Discipline - Suspension - For professional misconduct

    McLean pled guilty five counts of conduct unbecoming a lawyer. The Discipline Committee suspended him from practice for four months and placed him on indefinite supervision. McLean appealed the length of the penalty.

    The Saskatchewan ...

  • Mines and Minerals - Operation of mines, quarries and wells - Licences and permits - Appeals or judicial review - Standing - Costs

    Grizzly Resources Ltd. (Grizzly). made an applications to the Energy Resources Conservation Board to drill two sour gas wells on the same site. ...

  • Narcotic Control - Offences - Trafficking - Elements of

    The accused was charged with trafficking in cocaine. The trial judge granted the accused’s motion to discharge the charge. The Crown appealed.

    The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial.

    Link ...


TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.

Switch to our mobile site