July 12, 2010
Susan Van
Dyke
Client Surveys, Client Feedback, and the Dog
by Susan Van Dyke
July 12, 2010
I was in Whistler, British Columbia, for a law firm retreat and stayed at one of the best hotels – you know, one of those places with the ultra plush bedding, towels that stack high and spa-inspired toiletries that smell good enough to taste.
About a month before my stay, this hotel started a pilot program to accept dogs. So, not only did my family join me, so did our beloved Golden Retriever. After two nights in the palace, complete with The Dog, I spent the better part of an hour filling out their dog service survey. I used every available blank space on that survey, turning it this way and that way, spewing revenue-generating ideas, things that bugged me (and my pooch), and of course, lots of ideas how to promote this service to other dog-lovers. Proud of what I thought was a respectable contribution, I sealed the envelope with a smile, dropped it in their survey box and waited for recognition of my astute observations, clever use of white space or even a "thanks for filling out our survey, Ms. Van Dyke".
It's been months and I'm still waiting. So, I've started filling out all kinds of surveys now, just to see who is paying attention and responds beyond "Dear valued customer …."
And I do believe a response from the palace was warranted. Not only is it common sense to express gratitude, but it's also good business. I am a perfect candidate for repeat business as an engaged client of their service … or hospitality. Plus, dog-lovers walk and talk a lot with our own kind, so we're a good referral network of sorts.
I am an advocate for speaking up when you have experienced exceptional service — good or bad — I also believe we must ask our clients for their feedback in order to view ourselves through the lens of experienced clients. Quality service is a moving target and those that remain stationary do so at an increasing degree of risk because it's relative to the offerings of the firm across the street or even across the country. The ante is rising.
Many mid-sized and large firms push out client service surveys regularly and get a small but seemingly acceptable number of completed surveys returned. It's an easy, cost-effective method of "touching" a client with a communiqué that says they matter. In theory, it's also a process to collect all types of comments and opinions about your firm and its lawyers.
I wonder, though, about the quality of the feedback using surveys. Sure, it's a measure against an illusive service benchmark and could provide markers on an aggregate basis that would help flag a trend, but if one of your best clients was dissatisfied with their lawyer there's a darn good chance they are among the majority who don't complete your survey. Client retention among your upper echelon of clients should be tracked carefully. They should also be interviewed and not surveyed if you're serious about keeping them.
Know the risks if you put all your eggs in a client survey basket. And, at the very least, acknowledge the clients that do spend their precious time to tell you how you're doing, even if you get a bad review. Anything less will damage your image. Besides which, every person, and their dog, deserves better.
I was in Whistler, British Columbia, for a law firm retreat and stayed at one of the best hotels – you know, one of those places with the ultra plush bedding, towels that stack high and spa-inspired toiletries that smell good enough to taste.
About a month before my stay, this hotel started a pilot program to accept dogs. So, not only did my family join me, so did our beloved Golden Retriever. After two nights in the palace, complete with The Dog, I spent the better part of an hour filling out their dog service survey. I used every available blank space on that survey, turning it this way and that way, spewing revenue-generating ideas, things that bugged me (and my pooch), and of course, lots of ideas how to promote this service to other dog-lovers. Proud of what I thought was a respectable contribution, I sealed the envelope with a smile, dropped it in their survey box and waited for recognition of my astute observations, clever use of white space or even a "thanks for filling out our survey, Ms. Van Dyke".
It's been months and I'm still waiting. So, I've started filling out all kinds of surveys now, just to see who is paying attention and responds beyond "Dear valued customer …."
And I do believe a response from the palace was warranted. Not only is it common sense to express gratitude, but it's also good business. I am a perfect candidate for repeat business as an engaged client of their service … or hospitality. Plus, dog-lovers walk and talk a lot with our own kind, so we're a good referral network of sorts.
I am an advocate for speaking up when you have experienced exceptional service — good or bad — I also believe we must ask our clients for their feedback in order to view ourselves through the lens of experienced clients. Quality service is a moving target and those that remain stationary do so at an increasing degree of risk because it's relative to the offerings of the firm across the street or even across the country. The ante is rising.
Many mid-sized and large firms push out client service surveys regularly and get a small but seemingly acceptable number of completed surveys returned. It's an easy, cost-effective method of "touching" a client with a communiqué that says they matter. In theory, it's also a process to collect all types of comments and opinions about your firm and its lawyers.
I wonder, though, about the quality of the feedback using surveys. Sure, it's a measure against an illusive service benchmark and could provide markers on an aggregate basis that would help flag a trend, but if one of your best clients was dissatisfied with their lawyer there's a darn good chance they are among the majority who don't complete your survey. Client retention among your upper echelon of clients should be tracked carefully. They should also be interviewed and not surveyed if you're serious about keeping them.
Know the risks if you put all your eggs in a client survey basket. And, at the very least, acknowledge the clients that do spend their precious time to tell you how you're doing, even if you get a bad review. Anything less will damage your image. Besides which, every person, and their dog, deserves better.
Respond: make a comment | read the 1 comment
Share: Email | Save as PDF | Print
| Bookmark & Share |
| 
More columns on Columns: Legal Marketing | from Susan Van Dyke
|
the count:
8224 posts | 11403 comments
recent comments  
There is good leagal content that doesn’t necessarily come in the neat packages that we usually look in. Though our commercial legal database subscriptions have linked, vetted, edited, and easily. […] »»Research When you need to collaborate on a document displayed on your screen, it’s great to have a colleague from down the hall come into your office and look over your … »»Technology You should assess whether you can accept the financial risks associated with taking the matter, just as clients will assess whether they can (and will) pay your fee. Spend time at the beginning of the. […] »»Practice
-
Available online today are four new chapters of the publication Women in Canada: A Gender-based Statistical Report, which explores the socio-demographic and economic circumstances of Canadian women in general.
-
The bill amends the Constitution Act, 1867 by readjusting the number of members and the representation of the provinces in the House of Commons.
-
-
Blueseed plans to buy a ship and turn it into a floating incubator anchored in international waters off the coast of California.
-
Under Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the flow of information out of Ottawa has slowed to a trickle.
-
-
"…the IPC has exclusive jurisdiction to decide whether a record is in the custody or control of a university in the context of an access request…"
-
-
John J.L. Hunter, Q.C. of Vancouver has been elected President for 2011-2012
-
Detailed results from 321 members.
These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.
-
Banks and Banking - Liability of banks to third parties - Negligence - General
The plaintiffs were the former shareholders of a company that failed. They sued the defendant bank alleging that it breached its contract with the company and the plaintiffs and breached a duty ...
-
Actions - Cause of action - General principles - New or extended cause of action - Opening of floodgates
The plaintiff and defendant worked at different branches of the same bank. The defendant’s common-law husband was the plaintiff’s ex-husband. Over a four year period, the defendant ...
-
Aliens - Definitions and general principles - Immigration consultants
The Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) had been designated as the sole regulatory body of immigration consultants in Canada from 2004 until June 2011. On June 30, 2011, Bill C-35 came into force, which significantly amended ...
-
Criminal Law - Sexual offences, public morals and disorderly conduct - Public morals - Obscenity - Possession of child pornography
The accused was convicted of making child pornography available and two counts of possession of child pornography (see [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 197). Subsequently, he was sentenced ...
-
Criminal Law - Procedure - Charge or directions - Jury or judge alone - Directions regarding pleas or evidence of witnesses, co-accused and accomplices
Rowe was convicted by a jury of five offences. He appealed.
The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed ...
-
Narcotic Control - Offences - Possession - General
The accused wished to access marijuana for medicinal purposes but did not have an authorization to possess marijuana issued under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations. He was notified that a package of marihuana addressed to him had been ...
-
Narcotic Control - General - Legislation - Exemptions - Medicinal marijuana
McCrady, who had an application pending under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) to possess and grow marijuana, was convicted of possession of marijuana (Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), s. 4(1)). Hearn pleaded guilty ...
-
Criminal Law - Sentence - Trafficking in hashish or marijuana (incl. possession for purposes of trafficking)
The accused pleaded guilty to one count of possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking. He was sentenced to 30 days’ imprisonment to be served intermittently and 11 months’ ...
-
Municipal Law - Powers of municipalities - Particular powers - Imposition and collection of taxes or fees
Catalyst Paper Corp. operated a paper mill in the District of North Cowichan. Catalyst objected to the tax rate that it paid compared to residential ratepayers. In 2009, the ...
This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.
Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.
Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.
|
Susan,
We usually recommend doing follow-up survey's by telephone. Interpreting written surveys can be difficult. With telephone follow-ups you can read a lot into a customer's tone of voice and ask more follow-up questions when something does seem right. The value of the information one can get from a telephone call is light years ahead of what one can interpret from a written survey. That's my two cents anyway.