<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Goals of Private Law: A Book Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slaw.ca/2010/07/29/book-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2010/07/29/book-review/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s online legal magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.slaw.ca/2010/07/29/book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-759034</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slaw.ca/?p=23753#comment-759034</guid>
		<description>As always, an interesting review but as one of those who contributed an essay, I doubt whether (from my UK perspective) these essays do reflect a growing chasm between academic law and practice.

In my job of teaching law students such things as sales, carriage, secured transactions, set off, rules of jurisdiction and recognition of foreign court judgments, what I teach my students is, I hope, of  practical relevance to what (commercial) practitioners would hope future lawyers need to know. Ernie Weinrib&#039;s The Idea of Private Law doesn&#039;t come up much when teaching about charterparties. 

However, when writing for and talking to an audience of academics it is unsurprising if the perspective taken is a more theoretical one.(Not all of what I write at least is aimed at that audience). Whilst much of such work usually, I&#039;d accept, justifiably has the lifespan of a mayfly, when it is really well dones (as Birks An Introduction to the Law of Restitution was) it can be enormously influential on law in practice, albeit sometimes indirectly. In this collection I&#039;d single out Stephen Perry&#039;s piece as one which, if reflected upon by, say, a judge in a controversial negligence claim, has the potential to prevent serious errors from being made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, an interesting review but as one of those who contributed an essay, I doubt whether (from my UK perspective) these essays do reflect a growing chasm between academic law and practice.</p>
<p>In my job of teaching law students such things as sales, carriage, secured transactions, set off, rules of jurisdiction and recognition of foreign court judgments, what I teach my students is, I hope, of  practical relevance to what (commercial) practitioners would hope future lawyers need to know. Ernie Weinrib&#039;s The Idea of Private Law doesn&#039;t come up much when teaching about charterparties. </p>
<p>However, when writing for and talking to an audience of academics it is unsurprising if the perspective taken is a more theoretical one.(Not all of what I write at least is aimed at that audience). Whilst much of such work usually, I&#039;d accept, justifiably has the lifespan of a mayfly, when it is really well dones (as Birks An Introduction to the Law of Restitution was) it can be enormously influential on law in practice, albeit sometimes indirectly. In this collection I&#039;d single out Stephen Perry&#039;s piece as one which, if reflected upon by, say, a judge in a controversial negligence claim, has the potential to prevent serious errors from being made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.slaw.ca/2010/07/29/book-review/feed/ ) in 0.34656 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 12:21 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 1:21 pm UTC -->
