Following my customer service post last week, I had an experience on the weekend where store clerks were so intrusive that it was annoying. So much so that it makes me wonder if I want to go back to that store again. It's a reminder that while we need to be attentive to customer / client needs, it's possible to cross the line from good service to annoying and creepy. And it's possible to try too hard to sell our services.

I went into a new store, and was immediately asked by a greeter if they could direct me to something. He sent me in the right direction, where I was met by a sales clerk. The sales clerk helped me decide between some options (a wireless N router in case you are wondering). Once I had it in my hand, he asked if there was anything else he could help me with. I said no – thanked him for his help – and that I might just look at a couple other boxes on the shelf to satisfy myself that I made the right choice.

So far, so good – but that's when it fell off the rails.

He started to try to sell me an anti-virus product, but continued even after I said I was happy with my current anti-virus product. He told me he had to stay with me and walk me to the cash register. I asked if he was on commission (thinking he wanted to make sure he got credit for the sale) - he said no. I asked why he had to do that – he said he didn't know – it was a management rule. Frankly, it felt like I was being stalked or mistrusted. (I briefly considered wasting his time on a tour of the store to see how long he would stick with me – but I didn't have time for that myself.)

So he indeed walked with me right to the cashier and stood there until I paid and walked out the door.

And to continue the irritation, the cashier asked for my name and address. I asked why – he said if I lost my receipt and had to return it, they would have a record of the purchase. I wasn't satisfied with that answer, and saw no advantage to being in their database, so I politely declined. While he didn't say anything, that of course flustered and miffed the cashier.

So give our clients the attention they deserve, and make efforts to sell our services where appropriate to clients and potential clients – but don't cross the line into pester and peeve territory.

David Canton is a business lawyer and trade-mark agent with Harrison Pensa LLP in London, Ontario. David's practice focuses on technology issues and technology companies. David is co-author of Legal Land Mines in E-Commerce published by McGraw-Hill, writes a weekly column on Today’s Business Law for the London Free Press and the Canoe.ca Technology news, and blogs at canton.elegal.ca. 
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

2 Comments on “Customer Service – Don't Cross the Line Into Pester and Peeve Territory”

  1. Chris Secord says:

    This is indeed a sure-fire way to alienate customers! As a younger man, my friends and I (all moderately dressed and behaved) were followed in a video store by an employee while we looked for a movie to rent. We eventually left after being treated like criminals on the prowl. None of us ever set foot in the chain again. As for the tech-store, I can almost guess which one with those details provided. This is a common occurance spoken of by almost every one I know who shops there. It is indeed an awkward experience most days. It is so critical to remember that a customer who comes to us, wants to do business with us. We should put ourselves in their position and ask ourselves "What would make a great customer experience right now?" The words "right now" are key; every single different experience is an opportunity to shine.

  2. It sounds like they didn't want you to (horrors!) browse.

    I am wondering what the equivalent from a law firm or other legal organization would be? The lawyers I know wouldn't have time to be overly pushy in this manner. Perhaps too frequent marketing-type messages? I.e. too frequent newsletters and email notices? There is always a fine balance with this sort of thing between being valuable/informative, and being "spammy".

SlawTips      

SlawTips Top 10 Financial Errors: #8 Always Assume More Risk Than Needed
Friday, February 3

You should assess whether you can accept the financial risks associated with taking the matter, just as clients will assess whether they can (and will) pay your fee. Spend time at the beginning of the. […] »»

Practice

SlawTips Seeing New Federal Legislation
Wednesday, February 1

Today’s Tip is a simple reminder to view by “latest activity date”. The Parliament is back in session and those Slaw Tips readers for whom monitoring legislation is a regular … »»

Research

SlawTips Top 10 Financial Errors: #7 Put Off Dealing With Underperforming Lawyers
Friday, January 27

When everyone in the firm is required to report monthly to all other partners, you instill a culture in the firm that is self-correcting. If someone fails to regularly meet their financial goals, you. […] »»

Practice

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Administrative Law - Judicial review - General - Scope or standard of review

    Ten individuals complained to the Information and Privacy Commissioner that the Alberta Teachers’ Association (ATA) disclosed, in contravention of the Personal Information Protection Act, their personal information between October 13 and December 2, ...

  • Civil Rights - Property - Search and seizure - Search - What constitutes

    The accused was charged with possession of child pornography and making available child pornography. The accused brought an application, alleging several violations of his rights under the Charter.

    The Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s ...

  • Constitutional Law - Extent of powers conferred - Double aspect doctrine - General

    In provincial references, both the Alberta Court of Appeal (510 A.R. 200; 527 W.A.C. 200) and the Quebec Court of Appeal (2011 QCCA 591), concluded that the proposed Canadian Securities Act (CSA) was unconstitutional. A ...

  • Criminal Law - Procedure - Charge or directions - Jury or judge alone - Directions regarding evidence generally

    The accused was charged with breach of trust by a public official contrary to s. 122 of the Criminal Code. The trial judge acquitted the accused. ...

  • Civil Rights - Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Criminal and quasi-criminal proceedings - Delay (Charter, s. 7)

    MacIntosh was charged on three informations with a total of 43 counts of sexual offences against nine complainants in the 1970s. The first information ...

  • Real Property Tax - Valuation - Business property - Considerations

    Two breweries’ respective properties were assessed as special properties under the Assessment Act, 2006. They appealed their respective municipal tax assessments to the Review Commissioner. The Commissioner dismissed the appeals. The breweries each appealed. The appeals ...

  • Barristers and Solicitors -Duty to court - General principles - Duty of integrity

    The applicant (Girao) and Allstate Insurance Co. disputed entitlements to accident benefits. The respondent law firm represented Allstate. Girao complained to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (PCC) against Allstate for disclosing her ...

  • Criminal Law - Sentencing - Sentencing procedure and rights of the accused - Plea bargain or joint submission - Effect of

    The accused was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment for three breaches of a recognizance under s. 810.2 of the Criminal Code. He appealed and applied ...

  • Practice - Persons who can sue and be sued - Individuals and corporations - Status or standing - Class actions - Members of class - General

    The plaintiffs were Inuit or Métis persons who were forced to attend certain residential schools in Labrador and Newfoundland. They ...


law foundation icon

The re-development
of Slaw is assisted by
a grant from the
Law Foundation of Ontario

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.

Switch to our mobile site