August 27, 2010
Bob
Berring
Nostalgia and the Internet
by Bob Berring
August 27, 2010
The current spate of stories concerning nations trying to limit the use of Blackberries, when combined with the recently floated ‘net neutrality’ agreement between Verizon and Google, is emblematic of the continuing invasion of the world of telecommunication by the world of governmental and corporate power. Almost two decades ago, I was on a panel with Professor Marge Shultz of the Berkeley Law School faculty, who made a remark that I have never forgotten. Professor Shultz opined that,
Our ability to make advances in technology is outpacing our ability to understand how such progress fits in with law and politics at an increasing rate. Some serious political decisions about basic values will be forced upon us. The technology will be ready, human beings will not.
The Internet is a great, sprawling wonder. No one really planned it — a series of actions, some logical, some the expression of brilliant individual creativity both by institutions and humans — brought it into being. There was no instruction manual, no carefully considered plan for implementation and growth. David Post wrote a lovely book this year, In Search of Jefferson’s Moose, which explains, in readable prose, one version of how it came to be. Post uses the device of comparing Thomas Jefferson’s views on democracy with the ideal of a democratic cyberspace. One lesson I take from Professor Posts’s book, is that the Internet was developed and controlled by people who were technologists. The goal was to design a system that worked, one that delivered information as cleanly as possible. There was to be no responsibility for the content. The Internet was a highway, what traveled along its pathway was not its business. Given the restraint and purity of the vision, it is stunning how much revolved around individuals, information zealots who chose to rein in their own power.
Another dusty memory pops up. Fifteen years ago a colleague served on a blue ribbon federal commission studying the future of the Web. When I asked him what the conclusions about the future use of this promising new bit of technology would be, he replied, “Sex, gambling and shopping.” That sounded offensively pessimistic to me. Could our culture be so puerile? Time soon showed that he was correct. H. L. Mencken once said that no one ever lost a nickel underestimating the intelligence of the public, and many nickels were accumulated by those willing to pander to human vices. But other uses arose as well. And one stream was political. If everyone with access to a computer had access to everyone else, entirely new forms of political action could arise. And they began to do so. The old epigram that freedom of the press applied only for those who owned one, went down for the count. Using Twitter, YouTube and other vehicles, political dissent could be spread faster than any paper-based system could manage. Many of us associated the Internet with a “wild west” brand of libertarian individualism. Governments realized that it was time for adult supervision.
In one part of my life I study China, and I have watched with wonder as the Chinese government has labored to control information flow. The Great Firewall of China is very real, and China has no qualms about using the full power of the state to censor information. One can take a position about the evil of such censoring. Trust me. I can make a case for each side, but no one can argue with the fact that China is the indicator that state power and the Internet are on a collision course around the world.
Beyond politics, the corporate world is now stepping to the fore. If the Internet can be divided into premium and regular bands, with those who can pay the fare getting the seats in the front of the plane, the very soul of the Internet will change. Corporate behemoths like Google will move to the front of the line. The Internet will no longer be the open highway; it will become a toll road. The fact that Verizon and Google frame the discussion of the premium service concept in the garb of ‘net neutrality’ adds a cynical twist to the process. One defines neutrality when one is about to end it. Let us hope that they truly follow Google’s motto and, “do no evil.” I always worry when someone promises not to do something. It almost always seems to end up being done.
The answer here is government regulation, but the previous paragraph pointed out the problem with that solution. My faith in government regulation of information packed its bags and moved to the desert long ago. If anything it will make things worse.
It must be the morning fog outside my window, but I see tough days ahead. Change is afoot.
The current spate of stories concerning nations trying to limit the use of Blackberries, when combined with the recently floated ‘net neutrality’ agreement between Verizon and Google, is emblematic of the continuing invasion of the world of telecommunication by the world of governmental and corporate power. Almost two decades ago, I was on a panel with Professor Marge Shultz of the Berkeley Law School faculty, who made a remark that I have never forgotten. Professor Shultz opined that,
Our ability to make advances in technology is outpacing our ability to understand how such progress fits in with law and politics at an increasing rate. Some serious political decisions about basic values will be forced upon us. The technology will be ready, human beings will not.
The Internet is a great, sprawling wonder. No one really planned it — a series of actions, some logical, some the expression of brilliant individual creativity both by institutions and humans — brought it into being. There was no instruction manual, no carefully considered plan for implementation and growth. David Post wrote a lovely book this year, In Search of Jefferson’s Moose, which explains, in readable prose, one version of how it came to be. Post uses the device of comparing Thomas Jefferson’s views on democracy with the ideal of a democratic cyberspace. One lesson I take from Professor Posts’s book, is that the Internet was developed and controlled by people who were technologists. The goal was to design a system that worked, one that delivered information as cleanly as possible. There was to be no responsibility for the content. The Internet was a highway, what traveled along its pathway was not its business. Given the restraint and purity of the vision, it is stunning how much revolved around individuals, information zealots who chose to rein in their own power.
Another dusty memory pops up. Fifteen years ago a colleague served on a blue ribbon federal commission studying the future of the Web. When I asked him what the conclusions about the future use of this promising new bit of technology would be, he replied, “Sex, gambling and shopping.” That sounded offensively pessimistic to me. Could our culture be so puerile? Time soon showed that he was correct. H. L. Mencken once said that no one ever lost a nickel underestimating the intelligence of the public, and many nickels were accumulated by those willing to pander to human vices. But other uses arose as well. And one stream was political. If everyone with access to a computer had access to everyone else, entirely new forms of political action could arise. And they began to do so. The old epigram that freedom of the press applied only for those who owned one, went down for the count. Using Twitter, YouTube and other vehicles, political dissent could be spread faster than any paper-based system could manage. Many of us associated the Internet with a “wild west” brand of libertarian individualism. Governments realized that it was time for adult supervision.
In one part of my life I study China, and I have watched with wonder as the Chinese government has labored to control information flow. The Great Firewall of China is very real, and China has no qualms about using the full power of the state to censor information. One can take a position about the evil of such censoring. Trust me. I can make a case for each side, but no one can argue with the fact that China is the indicator that state power and the Internet are on a collision course around the world.
Beyond politics, the corporate world is now stepping to the fore. If the Internet can be divided into premium and regular bands, with those who can pay the fare getting the seats in the front of the plane, the very soul of the Internet will change. Corporate behemoths like Google will move to the front of the line. The Internet will no longer be the open highway; it will become a toll road. The fact that Verizon and Google frame the discussion of the premium service concept in the garb of ‘net neutrality’ adds a cynical twist to the process. One defines neutrality when one is about to end it. Let us hope that they truly follow Google’s motto and, “do no evil.” I always worry when someone promises not to do something. It almost always seems to end up being done.
The answer here is government regulation, but the previous paragraph pointed out the problem with that solution. My faith in government regulation of information packed its bags and moved to the desert long ago. If anything it will make things worse.
It must be the morning fog outside my window, but I see tough days ahead. Change is afoot.
Respond: make a comment
Share: Email | Save as PDF | Print
| Bookmark & Share |
| 
More columns on Columns: Legal Information | from Bob Berring
|
the count:
8216 posts | 11394 comments
recent comments  
You should assess whether you can accept the financial risks associated with taking the matter, just as clients will assess whether they can (and will) pay your fee. Spend time at the beginning of the. […] »»Practice Today’s Tip is a simple reminder to view by “latest activity date”. The Parliament is back in session and those Slaw Tips readers for whom monitoring legislation is a regular … »»Research When everyone in the firm is required to report monthly to all other partners, you instill a culture in the firm that is self-correcting. If someone fails to regularly meet their financial goals, you. […] »»Practice
-
Available online today are four new chapters of the publication Women in Canada: A Gender-based Statistical Report, which explores the socio-demographic and economic circumstances of Canadian women in general.
-
The bill amends the Constitution Act, 1867 by readjusting the number of members and the representation of the provinces in the House of Commons.
-
-
Blueseed plans to buy a ship and turn it into a floating incubator anchored in international waters off the coast of California.
-
Under Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the flow of information out of Ottawa has slowed to a trickle.
-
-
"…the IPC has exclusive jurisdiction to decide whether a record is in the custody or control of a university in the context of an access request…"
-
-
John J.L. Hunter, Q.C. of Vancouver has been elected President for 2011-2012
-
Detailed results from 321 members.
These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.
-
Administrative Law - Judicial review - General - Scope or standard of review
Ten individuals complained to the Information and Privacy Commissioner that the Alberta Teachers’ Association (ATA) disclosed, in contravention of the Personal Information Protection Act, their personal information between October 13 and December 2, ...
-
Civil Rights - Property - Search and seizure - Search - What constitutes
The accused was charged with possession of child pornography and making available child pornography. The accused brought an application, alleging several violations of his rights under the Charter.
The Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s ...
-
Constitutional Law - Extent of powers conferred - Double aspect doctrine - General
In provincial references, both the Alberta Court of Appeal (510 A.R. 200; 527 W.A.C. 200) and the Quebec Court of Appeal (2011 QCCA 591), concluded that the proposed Canadian Securities Act (CSA) was unconstitutional. A ...
-
Criminal Law - Procedure - Charge or directions - Jury or judge alone - Directions regarding evidence generally
The accused was charged with breach of trust by a public official contrary to s. 122 of the Criminal Code. The trial judge acquitted the accused. ...
-
Civil Rights - Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Criminal and quasi-criminal proceedings - Delay (Charter, s. 7)
MacIntosh was charged on three informations with a total of 43 counts of sexual offences against nine complainants in the 1970s. The first information ...
-
Real Property Tax - Valuation - Business property - Considerations
Two breweries’ respective properties were assessed as special properties under the Assessment Act, 2006. They appealed their respective municipal tax assessments to the Review Commissioner. The Commissioner dismissed the appeals. The breweries each appealed. The appeals ...
-
Barristers and Solicitors -Duty to court - General principles - Duty of integrity
The applicant (Girao) and Allstate Insurance Co. disputed entitlements to accident benefits. The respondent law firm represented Allstate. Girao complained to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (PCC) against Allstate for disclosing her ...
-
Criminal Law - Sentencing - Sentencing procedure and rights of the accused - Plea bargain or joint submission - Effect of
The accused was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment for three breaches of a recognizance under s. 810.2 of the Criminal Code. He appealed and applied ...
-
Practice - Persons who can sue and be sued - Individuals and corporations - Status or standing - Class actions - Members of class - General
The plaintiffs were Inuit or Métis persons who were forced to attend certain residential schools in Labrador and Newfoundland. They ...
This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.
Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.
Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.
|
