For a short moment, we had some innovative law firm marketing going on with Blakes flash mob dance! The Youtube video was here. That is until lawyers for the Black Eyed Peas called copyright foul. Youtube is now displaying the infringement image below:

I say boooo to the Black Eyed Peas and Will.I.Am. It's tough enough to get lawyers to leave their offices and walk down a couple flights of stairs for a fire drill. Can you imagine getting close to 50 of them dance in the middle of a shopping mall? Unheard of.

Happy holidays! :)

Steve Matthews is the Founder of Stem Legal, a company that helps organizations in the legal industry to gain greater web visibility.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

7 Comments on “Black Eyed Peas Spoil Blakes Flash Mob”

  1. Yosie Saint-Cyr says:

    Darn it… I missed it!

  2. Craig Burley says:

    Really? No one thought of this beforehand? No one at, ya know, Blakes?

  3. Jordan Furlong says:

    Probably this takedown will generate even more publicity for Blakes than the original stunt did, most of it relatively positive, so even if it's an unforeseen consequence, it will probably end up being a good one.

    I'd have personally preferred they had flash-mobbed to Bon Jovi's "You Give Love a Bad Name," but that's just me.

  4. Sorry I missed it! But rule #1 with using music for podcasts or video or whatever is to use podsafe music or get permission. I hope they can work it out because I'd like to see it!

  5. Greg Lambert says:

    Booooo!!

    Granted, they should have gotten copyright permission before hand, but it looked like they had a great time doing this, and perhaps it was a good morale building exercise for those that participated. I'd love to hear from someone at Blakes to see who came up with the idea, who participated, and how long it took to get prepared.

  6. Dale says:

    Is it even worth pointing out that a “flash mob” is different than a “publicity stunt,” (read: doing the same thing as Oprah is different than throwing a “silent disco.”)

    oh, b.t.w. I would still offer a "boo" to Mr. I.Am or is it just "Am?"…whatever.

  7. Anne Giardini says:

    I support artists having the right to protect their work as they see fit. Do the people who suggest otherwise post their legal work online for anyone to copy and use?

SlawTips      

SlawTips United Nations Documents
Wednesday, May 23

Today’s Tip: Monitor UN documents with RSS Since I last looked, the United Nations Documents site has a new look and feel. For what the site is trying to deliver, … »»

Research

SlawTips Updated Version of Great Social Media Guide for Lawyers Released
Wednesday, May 23

Last spring, Meritas’ Leadership Institute released a Social Media Guide for Lawyers. This helpful resource provided lawyers with an overview of the three main social media tools — LinkedIn, Faceb. […] »»

Technology

SlawTips Cash Flow Reports – Part 1
Thursday, May 17

Following on our earlier Top 10 Financial Errors posts, this is the first in a series of 10 posts dealing with Cash Flow Reports and in particular, cash flow management.… »»

Practice

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Aliens - Exclusion and expulsion - Power to detain and deport - Minister’s certificate - Review - Evidence

    In 2002, Harkat was detained pursuant to a ministerial security certificate issued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) as a person inadmissible to Canada on grounds ...

  • Contracts - Formation of contract - Signing - Electronic signature

    The plaintiff expressed an interest in purchasing the defendant’s (vendor’s) condo. The parties agreed to carry on their discussions through e-mail. Following an exchange of e-mails, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was contractually bound to ...

  • Barristers and Solicitors - Relationship with client - Confidential communications - General

    The petitioner was a Receiver appointed in March 2009 by a California court over the assets of GJB Enterprises Inc. (a “Ponzi scheme”) and its principals, the Berkes (the GJB parties). The court ordered ...

  • Practice - Costs - Funding before judgment - When interim or advance costs available

    The plaintiffs were “direct to home” satellite based subscription program providers. Rex and other defendants offered “grey market” services to Canadian residents to facilitate the unauthorized reception in Canada of the plaintiffs’ ...

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.