author photo

June 29, 2011

Susan Van Dyke

Lawyers and the Media

Benefits of the media

They may be friendly, but they are not your friends. They are skilled, resourceful and tenacious. And most drink too much coffee. Not to suggest a sinister intention, but their job is get information from you — information you may not want to share — whether it serves you or your clients or not.

There is a unique synergy between you though. Sure, you may be at odds most of the time, but you can come together in a highly productive manner if prepared and with a healthy dose of caution. 

Strange bedfellows

If there’s anything in common between lawyers and the media, it’s their love of words. Lawyers love to torture them, and reporters love to play with them. Lawyers’ daylight hours revolve around words, even the interpretation of everyday words, punctuation, and dangling modifiers; whereas the media have a larger, kinder – if not more public — playground.

Lawyers have tripwires everywhere. Use the wrong word in an agreement and your client could be exposed to a lawsuit, and so, they are verbose. While members of the media count in column inches, words, or seconds so that everything fits, and you can still get the lid on.

My idea of amusement? Watch them edit each other’s work. Now that would be fun.

One is discrete and just like your best friend, who can keep a secret – or at least keep it out of print. The other likes to shout from rooftops to anyone who will buy their paper or tune in to their show. 

Lawyers and the media. They are strange bedfellows and it’s only between rare and trusting lawyer-reporter working relationships that “off the record” pillow talk can happen. Otherwise, consider that microphone “hot” and recording. Same goes for iPhones, BlackBerries, handheld recorders, any type of smart phones … you get the idea.

Don’t go in alone

Most lawyers would rather be anywhere than in a media interview. Reporters are skilled interviewers and it’s hard not to spill the beans to someone who appears so darn interested in anything you have to say.

Despite all that, there is a symbiotic relationship between the two. You need each other to either tell a story to readers, or help a client generate public awareness, support or sympathy. Or heavens, it might even help generate work for your practice, your colleagues or raise awareness of your law firm – you know, the stuff money can’t buy.

And at the very intersection of the two camps, is trust. The reporter must trust that the lawyer will respond before deadline, say something that will be interesting and likely to resonate with their audience. “No comment” is not it. Say something else, smart people! How about “I am completely focussed on my client’s interests right now and hope to be able to speak with you later” or “These are unfortunate circumstances and no one is winning here.” 

Yet, the lawyer may see an opportunity to advance the client’s matter by releasing select pieces of information to the media, and that it not be misquoted, misconstrued or misrepresented in any way. Some lawyer clients will ask me if they can read a draft of the piece before it goes to print or air, and well, no their work is not usually subject to our review.

When working with a client on a media campaign, my own level of trust, generally speaking, is relative to the seniority of the reporter. Not to suggest junior reporters are running amok, or intentionally making mistakes. That’s just not what I’ve seen. Instead, they take comments out of context or leave a bad impression with their interviewee. It’s ok, we’re not all friends, but when a reporter makes a mistake, it can have huge consequences on you or your client.

At times, a reluctant lawyer will only speak to the media with the aid (or coaxing) of an internal marketing pro or an external public relations consultant. Let them do the heavy lifting and navigate a safer passage for you. You will be better prepared and more relaxed, so you’ll have a clearer head to give a great interview.

Crib notes for media interviews:

  1. Get consent from your client to speak to the media. If your Law Society doesn’t require it, loyalty from your client probably does.
  2. Get help as soon as possible – get an experienced interviewee, a marketing or communications professional, or a former journalist. They can all help you prepare.
  3. Understand your message(s) – jot them down and study them.
  4. Practice articulating each message differently until it rolls off your tongue comfortably four or five different ways. Make them your own, even if you didn’t write them.
  5. Consider what you’ll be asked, including the tough questions you don’t want to answer. Get answers for each and media training if you’re struggling with the tough ones.
  6. Boldly ask the reporter what they’ll be asking you. Many will tell you. Some will dodge and weave. 
  7. You are not on the witness stand. You don’t have to answer the question as it’s asked. Take a deep breath, think, and then speak. Consider your audience and how best to tell them your story. Avoid legalese and do use picture words and descriptions. 
  8. Unless it’s radio, find some visuals to accompany your story. Photos, props, video, evidence, other interviewees, etc.
  9. Get as comfortable as possible. Conduct the interview on your own turf if possible.
  10. If your image will be used, take a moment and check your appearance. It’s time to primp. Fellas, powder is not just for women.

When you’re called for an interview, just stop for a moment and consider why you should do it. Then, start preparing to meet a new “friend”.

Susan Van Dyke works with managing partners, lawyers and marketing professionals in firms of all sizes to improve the profile of firms and lawyers; and she manages communications projects that involve mergers, branding, media relations, advertising and websites. She also advises on business development plans, including their development and execution. Susan recently completed two terms as president of the Legal Marketing Association's Vancouver Chapter and is the only Canadian to serve on its international board.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

Make a comment:

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products, that make personal attacks, or that seek personal legal advice.

Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.

 

SlawTips      

SlawTips Can I Get a Little Help Here?
Thursday, March 8

Poor delegations skills are a real time-waster, and poor delegation is usually brought on by the attitude “If you want something done right you have to do it yourself.” This … »»

Practice

SlawTips Take Responsibility for Missing Data
Wednesday, March 7

Have you ever noticed something missing when you are searching in a service. Ever said to yourself, I have this document somewhere, why don’t they? Ever noticed a spelling error … »»

Research

SlawTips Keyboard Shortcuts for Easily Changing Line Spacing in MS Word
Wednesday, March 7

You can change line spacing in Word by clicking on Format, selecting Paragraph, clicking on the Indents and spacing tab, and adjusting the spacing settings. Whew! That’s a lot of … »»

Technology

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Land Regulation - Land use control - Exemptions - Nonconforming use - Use not conforming to zoning bylaw - Lawful use prior to zoning


    The village of Drummond applied for an order directing the Michauds to dismantle a fence that did not comply with its municipal ...

  • Family Law - Divorce - Grounds - Separation - What constitutes “living separate and apart”

    The parties were married on March 31, 2004 and separated on February 10, 2010. The husband petitioned for divorce on the grounds that there had been a breakdown of the marriage ...

  • Criminal Law - Punishments (sentence) - Suspended sentence - Revocation of

    On her way home after drinking at a bar, Henderson drove into the back of a City of Winnipeg street-cleaning truck, pinning a City employee between her car and the truck. Henderson pled guilty to ...


law foundation icon

The re-development
of Slaw is assisted by
a grant from the
Law Foundation of Ontario

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.