Even in 2011, I receive a surprisingly large number of documents that require me to print them, sign them, and fax them back to the sender. Ironically, most of these documents are sent to me as PDF attachments to e-mails.

We've banned physical fax machines at Clio, and instead use RingCentral for sending an receiving faxes. My workflow below helps me avoid having to print and scan documents that require completion and signing:

  1. Download the PDF document
  2. Open in Adobe Acrobat Professional
  3. Use the "typewriter" tool to complete form fields
  4. Open a separate PDF file where I've signed my name using the "pencil" tool
  5. Copy and paste my signature onto the document
  6. Save the completed document
  7. Upload and fax the document via RingCentral

This beats having to deal with scanners and printers, but it's a laborious process.
HelloFax is a new service that helps make the dream of a paperless office a reality. Completing a form with HelloFax requires only a few steps:

  1. Upload your document to HelloFax
  2. Fill out fields and insert your signature using HelloFax's web interface
  3. Enter fax number or e-mail address, click "send"

HelloFax helps take a huge amount of the pain out of completing PDF-based forms, and has thankfully helped move these "dumb" documents into the 21st century.

Jack Newton is co-founder and President of Clio, a leading provider of cloud-based practice management software. Jack writes frequently on the security, ethical, and practical aspects of cloud computing, and has spoken at CLE seminars across Canada and the U.S. about how practice management systems can be used to help a lawyer practice efficiently, ethically and competently. Jack can be reached at jack@goclio.com.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

5 Comments on “A Step Closer to Killing the Fax Machine”

  1. Victor Medina says:

    Jack,

    Have you tried PDFPen (Pro and not)? I ask because I only own Adobe and agree it's a laborious process. I've heard PDF Pen is easier, but I can't get the workflow right there either (I've downloaded the free trial).

    I hate faxes and we've been fax free for the last 3 years.

    Victor

  2. Joseph says:

    Hi Jack- Joseph here, the cofounder of HelloFax. Just wanted to thank you for the article!

    The problem we're trying to solve is that we shouldn't need multiple pieces of hardware (printers, scanners, fax machines) and then software (adobe acrobat pro or others) to send documents. It's really wasteful (think of all the paper) and it takes a lot of time. Really cool to see that the traditional flow takes 7 steps and ours takes 3. I never contrasted the flows like that before.

    Anyway, we have a lot of cool stuff in store, which we're hoping will make people stop using paper in the office!

    Thanks again for writing.

    Best,
    Joseph

  3. Jack Newton says:

    Hi Victor,

    I haven't tried PDFPen – hadn't heard of it either. Thanks for pointing it out, I'll check it out.

    Cheers,
    Jack

  4. Jack Newton says:

    Hey Joseph, thanks for dropping by! Great on the product – keep up the great work.

  5. John Gregory says:

    What indicates to the recipient of the virtual fax generated by either of the methods mentioned (the 7-step method or the 3-step method) that the signature was actually applied by or with the authority of the person purporting to sign it? Will that work if the sender later denies having signed it? Does something prevent the recipient from copying the signature out of the received document and applying it to something else? (I don't claim that a traditional fax is much better for the latter purpose, but at least it's in recognizable hand-writing for the purpose of showing that the purported signer did sign it.)

Make a comment:

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products, that make personal attacks, or that seek personal legal advice.

Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.

 

SlawTips      

SlawTips Cash Flow Reports – Part 2
Thursday, May 24

This is the second in a series of ten tips dealing with cash flow reports and cash flow management. Gregory Nunn once said: “Never underestimate the value of cold cash.”… »»

Practice

SlawTips United Nations Documents
Wednesday, May 23

Today’s Tip: Monitor UN documents with RSS Since I last looked, the United Nations Documents site has a new look and feel. For what the site is trying to deliver, … »»

Research

SlawTips Updated Version of Great Social Media Guide for Lawyers Released
Wednesday, May 23

Last spring, Meritas’ Leadership Institute released a Social Media Guide for Lawyers. This helpful resource provided lawyers with an overview of the three main social media tools — LinkedIn, Faceb. […] »»

Technology

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Aliens - Exclusion and expulsion - Power to detain and deport - Minister’s certificate - Review - Evidence

    In 2002, Harkat was detained pursuant to a ministerial security certificate issued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) as a person inadmissible to Canada on grounds ...

  • Contracts - Formation of contract - Signing - Electronic signature

    The plaintiff expressed an interest in purchasing the defendant’s (vendor’s) condo. The parties agreed to carry on their discussions through e-mail. Following an exchange of e-mails, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was contractually bound to ...

  • Barristers and Solicitors - Relationship with client - Confidential communications - General

    The petitioner was a Receiver appointed in March 2009 by a California court over the assets of GJB Enterprises Inc. (a “Ponzi scheme”) and its principals, the Berkes (the GJB parties). The court ordered ...

  • Practice - Costs - Funding before judgment - When interim or advance costs available

    The plaintiffs were “direct to home” satellite based subscription program providers. Rex and other defendants offered “grey market” services to Canadian residents to facilitate the unauthorized reception in Canada of the plaintiffs’ ...

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.