There are some very interesting items in the T&C (Terms & Conditions) that most people never read. The tendency is to click, click, click just to get to the end quickly. The T&C for iCloud is around 12-13 pages long, depending on the device used to view it. So let’s dive right into some of the “features” presented in the T&C and what they may mean.

First, you are required to have a compatible device, duh? It also states that “…certain software (fees may apply)…” whatever that means. There are a lot of words about the location-based services and what Apple and its partners can do with the collected data. Make sure you understand the cloud collects GPS location, crowd-sourced Wi-Fi information, cell tower location, device ID, Apple ID, etc. That sounds like enough information to be personally identifiable to us. There are no words on how long they store the data, if at all, but we’re pretty sure they don’t throw it away after processing. You can opt out of the collection by not using any location-based services, which we doubt many will do.

One interesting item is “The Find My iPhone and Find My Mac features are intended for your personal use only.” Does that mean you cannot use the features in a commercial setting? Probably not, but it’s not very clear.

Apple doesn’t take any responsibility for the integrity of any content stored in iCloud. In other words, you are on your own so don’t assume that you can actually use any of the data that you may transmit to iCloud. There’s a whole sentence in capital letters that states “…Apple does not guarantee or warrant that any content you may store or access through the service will not be subject to inadvertent damage, corruption, loss, or removal in accordance…” Geez, you call that a backup solution? Apparently not, since a few pages later they say “You are responsible for backing up, to your own computer or other device, any important documents, images or other Content that you store or access via the Service.” Also, if you enable the iCloud “backup” your device will no longer get backed up to iTunes during a sync. Does that make sense? There is no guarantee that content in iCloud will be usable AND it won’t be in iTunes any more. To us, that is pretty amazing.

You might reasonably think you’ll be notified whenever the terms change or the service is terminated but we doubt it. “Apple may post on our website and/or will send an email to the primary address associated with your Account to provide notice of any material changes to the Service.” That word “may” is a killer. Sure, Apple may protect your privacy too, just like Facebook. We’re not exactly buying the “trust me” language in light of the historical evidence.

Be aware that Apple will automatically bill you for any storage upgrade fees in advance of the service being provided. This means your credit card will be charged on an annual basis until you cancel so make sure you cancel prior to the renewal time. At least Apple will give you 30 days notice via email so you can react accordingly. Good thing since any fees and charges paid by you are not refundable unless you contact Apple within 45 days of the yearly payment.

One of the more disturbing provisions states that Apple will give your data to any law enforcement authority, government official or third party if they feel it appropriate, necessary or legally required. That’s pretty scary and there is nothing that says Apple will even give you notice that they are giving over your data. Apparently your data is not encrypted in iCloud or Apple has the decryption keys, which still means unintended parties can see your data. This means that iCloud is NOT an acceptable service for attorneys that keep client information on their iDevices.

Another scary provision allows Apple to change your content “…to comply with technical requirements of connecting networks or devices or computers.” We assume this means the changes are such things as image size, etc. and not the actual substance, but the words don’t restrict even that.

Towards the end of the T&C, there is a section that says you can’t sue Apple, its affiliates, officers, employees, etc. (they mention anyone that even remotely associates with Apple). You can say that all you want, but we’re not sure that it will hold up in court. And it sure doesn’t give any attorney a lot of comfort that he/she is dealing with a reputable vendor.

The message is to always READ the terms of service. After reading this one, we can’t see why anyone, especially an attorney, would want to use the iCloud service – it looks like a per se ethics violation to us.

Sharon D. Nelson, Esq. graduated from Georgetown University Law Center in 1978 and has been in private practice ever since. Her primary practice area is electronic evidence law. Ms. Nelson is the past President of the Fairfax Bar Association, a Director of the Fairfax Law Foundation, and past chair of the American Bar Association’s TECHSHOW Board. She is the former chair of the ABA Law Practice Management Publications Board and currently serves on the Governing Council of the ABA's Law Practice Management Section.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- John W. Simek is the Vice President of Sensei Enterprises, Inc. He is an EnCase Certified Examiner (EnCE) and a nationally known testifying expert in the area of computer forensics. Mr. Simek holds a degree in engineering from the United States Merchant Marine Academy and an MBA in finance from Saint Joseph’s University.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

2 Comments on “Have Attorneys Read the iCloud Terms and Conditions?”

  1. David Canton says:

    I wish Apple would take the same simple, clear approach to EULAs that it takes with its products.

  2. John Gregory says:

    I read that Google is not really any better. Does *any* cloud provider negotiate with *anybody*? Negotiation cuts down economies of scale, after all.

    Those who think of putting things in the cloud should consider the current fate of Megaupload, which has essentially been put out of business by the US government in collaboration with a few other governments, and there is a serious risk that all the data on the site – a lot of it – may be lost. This because of allegations of some copyright infringement, though much of the data infringed nothing. And the TOU of Megaupload are irrelevant. Good luck fighting the US government when it is in cahoots with the recording and movie industries, as it is pretty well full time nowadays. If people had not backed up their data, too bad for them.

Make a comment:

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products, that make personal attacks, or that seek personal legal advice.

Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.

 

SlawTips      

SlawTips Good Communications = Satisfied Clients
Thursday, February 23

As Richard Ferguson, a lawyer friend of ours says on his email message: “People may forget what you said…. People may forget what you did…. but people will never forget … »»

Practice

SlawTips Current Awareness
Wednesday, February 22

There are two possible approaches to personal current awareness: Develop excellent searching skills so that you can find what you need when you need it Pick a fairly narrow specialty … »»

Research

SlawTips Top 10 Financial Errors: #10 Rely on the Lottery for Your Partnership Retirement Plan
Thursday, February 16

“It is better to have a permanent income than to be fascinating” was said once by Oscar Wilde. The final tip in this series is the capstone issue in our … »»

Practice

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Limitation of Actions - Actions in contract - Actions for debt - General

    Moody died on December 3, 2005, leaving four adult children. Pursuant to Moody’s will two of her children, James and Tyrell, were appointed executors of the estate. It was alleged that, during her ...

  • Barristers and Solicitors - Discipline - Suspension - For professional misconduct

    McLean pled guilty five counts of conduct unbecoming a lawyer. The Discipline Committee suspended him from practice for four months and placed him on indefinite supervision. McLean appealed the length of the penalty.

    The Saskatchewan ...

  • Mines and Minerals - Operation of mines, quarries and wells - Licences and permits - Appeals or judicial review - Standing - Costs

    Grizzly Resources Ltd. (Grizzly). made an applications to the Energy Resources Conservation Board to drill two sour gas wells on the same site. ...

  • Narcotic Control - Offences - Trafficking - Elements of

    The accused was charged with trafficking in cocaine. The trial judge granted the accused’s motion to discharge the charge. The Crown appealed.

    The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial.

    Link ...


TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.

Switch to our mobile site