I heard lately of a case where someone mediating a dispute between A and B sent an email about the dispute to A with a bcc: to B.

A managed to examine the header of the email sufficiently to see the bcc: to B, and complained to the mediator.

My first reaction was "wow, I didn't know you could do that!" Do lawyers now have to scrub their email headers the way they are supposed to scrub metadata out of documents before sending to the other side?

My second response was "wait a minute! What was the mediator doing sending a bcc: to B?" Shouldn't the mediator disclose to both parties all communications made to either – at least subject to express requests for or undertakings of confidentiality – in either case, a hidden communication to the other party should be off limits.

S. 8 of Ontario's Commercial Mediation Act (and s. 11 of Nova Scotia's Act of the same name) say that the mediator may disclose any information received from a party, unless expressly requested to keep it in confidence. But that doesn't really apply here, where the mediator's own communication was in issue.

Any views from Slawians on either email headers as sources of metadata or on mediators' duties not to communicate with hidden messages?

John D. Gregory is an Ontario lawyer called in 1977, with a special interest in what happens to the law when you take the paper away. He works in civil justice law reform at the Ministry of the Attorney General, but his Slawian opinions are not necessarily those of the Ministry.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

One Comment on “A Mediator's Duty of Disclosure”

  1. Kari Boyle says:

    Hi John:
    Very interesting issue. Mediate BC's Standards of Conduct provide in section 7.4:

    "Prior to holding a private session with a participant, other than a pre-mediation interview, the mediator must ensure that each participant agrees whether or not information disclosed in the private session is confidential."

    If an e-mail to one party during the course of a mediation process is considered a "private session" then arguably this provision emphasizes the duty of the mediator to ensure that these kinds of issues are discussed and resolved well in advance. Usually, the Agreement to Mediate raises the issues of the "rules" around caucusing and communications between the party and the mediator.
    Still, it would be rare for a party to agree that it was okay for the other party to receive blind copies of e-mail correspondence – why wouldn't the other party just be cc'd for transparency? Using a bcc seems very risky to me.

    I'm afraid that I can't comment on the metadata issue but I'll be interested to hear the views of others on both issues!
    Thanks John
    Kari Boyle

Make a comment:

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products, that make personal attacks, or that seek personal legal advice.

Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.

 

SlawTips      

SlawTips Cash Flow Reports – Part 2
Thursday, May 24

This is the second in a series of ten tips dealing with cash flow reports and cash flow management. Gregory Nunn once said: “Never underestimate the value of cold cash.”… »»

Practice

SlawTips United Nations Documents
Wednesday, May 23

Today’s Tip: Monitor UN documents with RSS Since I last looked, the United Nations Documents site has a new look and feel. For what the site is trying to deliver, … »»

Research

SlawTips Updated Version of Great Social Media Guide for Lawyers Released
Wednesday, May 23

Last spring, Meritas’ Leadership Institute released a Social Media Guide for Lawyers. This helpful resource provided lawyers with an overview of the three main social media tools — LinkedIn, Faceb. […] »»

Technology

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Aliens - Exclusion and expulsion - Power to detain and deport - Minister’s certificate - Review - Evidence

    In 2002, Harkat was detained pursuant to a ministerial security certificate issued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) as a person inadmissible to Canada on grounds ...

  • Contracts - Formation of contract - Signing - Electronic signature

    The plaintiff expressed an interest in purchasing the defendant’s (vendor’s) condo. The parties agreed to carry on their discussions through e-mail. Following an exchange of e-mails, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was contractually bound to ...

  • Barristers and Solicitors - Relationship with client - Confidential communications - General

    The petitioner was a Receiver appointed in March 2009 by a California court over the assets of GJB Enterprises Inc. (a “Ponzi scheme”) and its principals, the Berkes (the GJB parties). The court ordered ...

  • Practice - Costs - Funding before judgment - When interim or advance costs available

    The plaintiffs were “direct to home” satellite based subscription program providers. Rex and other defendants offered “grey market” services to Canadian residents to facilitate the unauthorized reception in Canada of the plaintiffs’ ...

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.