Canada’s Cannabis Act: A High Level Overview

The Cannabis Act, which will legalize the recreational use of cannabis across Canada, was unveiled by the federal government this past Thursday.

The Act is fairly dense, spanning 226 sections and 6 schedules. While there is a lot of content to digest in the Cannabis Act this is only the tip of the legislative-iceberg. Much of the new law will be encoded in the yet to be drafted federal regulations. Additionally, the provincial and municipal governments across the country have a large role to play as they have been explicitly given authority by the federal government to fill in some of the legislative holes (e.g. as the law will relate to retail and distribution) or to alter some of the existing baselines set out by the Cannabis Act (e.g. the minimum age for purchase and consumption).

Below are some of the highlights of the Cannabis Act. This post is meant to serve as a high-level overview.

Overarching Theme

The federal government has made it clear, repeatedly, that the purpose of legalizing cannabis is to restrict access and keep it out of the hands of Canadian youth and to drive organized crime out of the cannabis business.

This overarching theme of protecting youth and promoting public safety is evident throughout the Act and indeed the second sentence of the Act itself explicitly states that its objectives are to prevent young persons from accessing cannabis, to protect public health and public safety and to deter criminal activity.

Consistent with this overarching theme is the fact that the government has stated that the existing law prohibiting the production, sale and consumption of recreational cannabis will continue to be enforced until the Cannabis Act comes into effect (which the government has indicated will be no later than July, 2018). Whether or not you agree with this approach, it is fair to say that if the government were to cease enforcing the existing laws prior to the Cannabis Act coming into force it would severely undermine its stated objective of protecting youth and deterring criminal activity.

Grow Your Own

The Cannabis Act permits households to grow four of their own plants provided that the plants do not grow to a height of more than one meter. This four plant limit exists regardless of the number of adults that reside in the household. If an adult, or household, decides to grow less than four plants, or none at all, they are prohibited from transferring their “unused allotment” to someone else.

Interestingly, people will not be restricted to growing indoors. The Cannabis Act explicitly contemplates that people will be able to grow in their gardens, yards, greenhouses and the like.

Provinces and municipalities may step in and lower the number of plants that can be grown per household. In theory, these lower levels of government could also place restrictions on the ability to grow outdoors.

What Can you Buy?

Adults will be able to purchase fresh cannabis, dried cannabis, cannabis oil, cannabis plants or seeds. Edibles are not yet on the table. However, the federal government has explicitly said that it very much intends to legalize the sale of edibles, it just wants to take things a bit slower on that front because they really want to be sure they get it right. In particular the government is concerned with issues such as standardizing serving sizes and potency, child-resistant packaging requirements and standardizing health warnings. That being said, adults will be able to alter the cannabis that they purchase, provided that the alterations do not run afoul of the Act, which means that while you cannot purchase edibles, you certainly can make and consume them yourself.

How Much Can you Buy?

Adults will be able to possess 30 grams of dried cannabis, or the equivalent amount in fresh or oil form as prescribed by the Act, in public. Similarly, an adult will only be able to buy 30 grams or its equivalent at one time.

This 30 gram limit is the maximum. The federal government has left it open for the individual provinces to lower this number if they see fit to do so.

Advertising

Advertising is a hot issue for people who are in the cannabis industry, whether it be the existing Canadian medical cannabis industry, or in the cannabis industry in one of the American states where cannabis is legal.

It was expected that the government would come down hard with regulations heavily restricting advertising along the lines of the tobacco industry. The Cannabis Act does set heavy restrictions on advertising but there are some interesting exceptions / wrinkles. One relates to being able to promote cannabis or cannabis accessories (perhaps in a limited fashion) provided that the advertising will only be seen by those 18 years of age or older. Another exception is business to business advertising, which appears to be completely exempt from whatever restrictions are looming in the yet to be drafted regulations.

What about the Medical Regime?

The existing medical system which operates under the Access to Cannabis for Medical Purposes Regulations (“ACMPR”) will continue. The federal government will initially allow the two systems to operate in tandem and has indicated that it intends to evaluate the medical regime within five years of the Cannabis Act coming into force.

However, there is some immediate cross-over between the two systems. For example, companies licensed to cultivate or sell under the ACMPR are deemed to be licensed under the Cannabis Act as well.

Seeing how the recreational regime will impact the existing medical regime on a practical level will be one of the more interesting things to watch once the Cannabis Act comes into force.

Protecting the Children and Turfing the Criminals

Some of the penalties for offences under the Cannabis Act are extremely heavy. Selling more than 30 grams, selling illicit cannabis (i.e. cannabis not grown by someone licensed under the Cannabis Act) and selling to children under 18 can result in a maximum sentence of 14 years in jail. The government has also made selling at a school or any other place where children are likely to frequent an aggravating factor that has to be considered by the judge when sentencing.

Other offences have a wide range of penalties and can be pursued either by indictment or by way of summary offence. Way down at the bottom end of the severity chart are some offences (e.g. growing more than 4 plants) which can result in a simple ticket, fine and no criminal record.

What Is Next?

As mentioned above, while the overall framework has been revealed there is still a lot of meat that has to be put on the legislative bones by way of regulations. Additionally, the provinces and municipalities have about 15 months to form their own legislation and regulations on issues that the federal legislation will not touch. This includes issues like how and where cannabis will be sold, distributed and consumed.

As such, there is going to be a lot more law rolling out across the country. The Cannabis Act is simply the opening chapter in the new world of legalized recreational cannabis in Canada.

Comments

  1. “Some of the penalties for offences under the Cannabis Act are extremely heavy. Selling more than 30 grams, selling illicit cannabis (i.e. cannabis not grown by someone licensed under the Cannabis Act) and selling to children under 18 can result in a maximum sentence of 14 years in jail.”

    In law, there is a general principle that the punishment must fit the offence. I’m concerned that the “14 year maximum” will be used as a means of coercion to get suspects to give over information and to confess to crimes they may have not committed.

    I think this is a harmful use of the law and will end up wasting precious time in the courts.

  2. Peggie Fitzpatrick

    I agree with the legalization of recreational cannabis. Keeping it out of the hands of minors will; however, be a a formidable task. There is the possibility and perhaps the probability that the criminal element will continue to thrive to fill to serve the kids and adults outside the law. The prospect of profit and turf protection will continue to not be thwarted by even a 14 year maximum sentence. Kids will smoke pot under the new regimen just as they continue to smoke tobacco and consume alcohol in the face of age restrictions. If the adults are allowed to and do in fact grow it, keeping it out of the hands of kids will happen only when kids buy into the dangers of cannabis consumption. Not sure that is likely if cannabis consumption continues to be social currency among adolescents.

  3. The Canadian government in its haste to legalize marijuana seems to misunderstand that it has a responsibility to protect Canadians in every way possible when introducing new legislation. It took great steps in developing “handouts” and online pamphlets to educate physicians for example, who were given licence to use it medically since 2001 in this country.
    However, not one tax dollar was used to create formal medical education programs for physicians in Canada, instead, interested physicians organized their own education, through the help of CME companies, and received funding to hold these programs from the private sector, primarily pharmaceutical companies with an interest in the field. Now, with the legal recreational use on the horizon, Ottawa has set aside $9.5 million for “educating” teens on the responsible use of marijuana. Educating teens. Well, its a start, I guess.
    This is no where near what is needed to train government agencies, law enforcement, security agencies, schools, social agencies, medical practitioners, patients, rec users and a variety of other stakeholders. I agree with the legalization, but the government needs to step up and allocate proper resources and financial support to educating its populous, either for professional knowledge or just to protect those who will be using it for enjoyment. There are companies in Canada such as the experts at International Cannabis Solutions who do just this type of work, in educating professionals (medical and others) and lay persons alike. With legalization only months away, why haven’t resources been allocated and why have educational programs not been developed already? What is the government waiting for?

Leave a Reply

(Your email address will not be published or distributed)