Those following the US antitrust litigation against Apple and five of the big publishers in respect of ebook pricing by now will have seen Judge Cote's decision to deny the… [more]
|
archive for the ‘Case Comment’ category (US) Ebook Pricing Antitrust Suit (Definitely) Not Dismissed by Kim Nayyer Wednesday, May 16th, 2012
Those following the US antitrust litigation against Apple and five of the big publishers in respect of ebook pricing by now will have seen Judge Cote's decision to deny the… [more]
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently confirmed that when an employee was terminated for stealing from his employer, he was still entitled to his annual bonus because it was clearly… [more]
The New Brunswick Court of Appeal has published a substantial review of the impact of using email to transfer real estate. Its decision in Druet v. Girouard… [more] 2012 NBCA 40
The Ontario Court of Appeal released its much anticipated judgment on the legality of Canada's prostitution laws yesterday in the decision of R. v. Bedford. Helicopter Lawyering? Can Mom Represent Son in Family Law Case? by Adam Dodek Friday, March 2nd, 2012
You may have heard about helicopter parenting – the overprotective parent who hovers over their child on the playground, maybe takes them to university, stays in the dorm for a… [more]
"You may have won a million dollars!" … or not, if you don't happen to have the pre-selected winning number. Various bonus prizes for early birds are also offered. This… [more]
It hasn't taken long for a court to apply the new tort of invasion of seclusion first recognized by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Jones v. Tsige… [more] January. While Catholic Students Cannot Be Exempt From Ethics and World Religions Course by Yosie Saint-Cyr Thursday, February 23rd, 2012
When I was growing up in Quebec in the late 1960s and 70s, there were publicly funded separate Protestant and Catholic school boards which included French and English schools also… [more] Case Comment: Durnin and Fisher v. Victoria Hospital, 2012 ONSC 320 by David Cheifetz Saturday, February 18th, 2012
Durnin & Fisher v Victoria Hospital, 2012 ONSC 320* |
the count:
The Wet One on Capital Punishment Enthusiasm Is Misplaced Bonnie Czegledi on Crime and Cultural Property John Gregory on What Part of "No" Don't You Understand, O Gracious Crown? John Gregory on Ontario Bill to Amend the Electronic Commerce Act Erik Magraken on B.C. to Have Official Online Dispute Resolution esign on Ontario Bill to Amend the Electronic Commerce Act Connie Crosby on Twitter Updates Privacy Policy and Terms of Service John Gregory on Victoria Day Holiday Lloyd Duhaime on Victoria Day Holiday John G on Victoria Day Holiday John N. Davis on Victoria Day Holiday Simon Fodden on Images in Judgments Daniel Poulin on Images in Judgments John G on The Friday Fillip: Randomness Kim Nayyer on Shoes and Dominoes SlawTips |
|
|
||
BCSC Rules Hearing Fees Unconsitutional Barrier to Access
by Kim Nayyer
Wednesday, May 23rd, 2012
On May 22 the B.C. Supreme Court issued an interesting ruling in Vilardell v. Dunham… [more], 2012 BCSC 748, an application that arose out of a family law proceeding. The