<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Slaw</provider_name><provider_url>http://www.slaw.ca</provider_url><author_name>Omar Ha-Redeye</author_name><author_url>http://www.slaw.ca/author/redeye/</author_url><title>The Just and Equitable Exception to Piercing Corporate Veil - Slaw</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.slaw.ca/2017/01/29/the-just-and-equitable-exception-to-piercing-corporate-veil/"&gt;The Just and Equitable Exception to Piercing Corporate Veil&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;
&lt;!--//--&gt;&lt;![CDATA[//&gt;&lt;!--
		/*! This file is auto-generated */
		!function(c,d){"use strict";var e=!1,n=!1;if(d.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},!c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var r,a,i,s=d.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),n=d.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=0;o&lt;n.length;o++)n[o].style.display="none";for(o=0;o&lt;s.length;o++)if(r=s[o],e.source===r.contentWindow){if(r.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i&lt;200)i=200;r.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(a=d.createElement("a"),i=d.createElement("a"),a.href=r.getAttribute("src"),i.href=t.value,i.host===a.host)if(d.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener("message",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),d.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),c.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!n){n=!0;for(var e,t,r=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),i=d.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),s=0;s&lt;i.length;s++){if(!(e=i[s]).getAttribute("data-secret"))t=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t);if(r||a)(t=e.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),e.parentNode.replaceChild(t,e)}}}}(window,document);
//--&gt;&lt;!]]&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="http://www.slaw.ca/2017/01/29/the-just-and-equitable-exception-to-piercing-corporate-veil/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;The Just and Equitable Exception to Piercing Corporate Veil&#x201D; &#x2014; Slaw" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><description>After the Supreme Court of Canada&#x2019;s 2015 decision in&#xA0;Chevron Corp. v. Yaiguaje, where the Court affirmed the ability of our legal system to&#xA0;hear foreign&#xA0;enforcement actions, the matter has returned to the Ontario Superior Court. The original stay by Justice Brown in 2013 was set aside by the Court, but the issue of the corporate separateness [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
