This from Christine Sopora, Coordinator, The Canadian Bar Review:

The Canadian Bar Review Special Edition on Ethics
Call for Submissions

The Canadian Bar Review invites submissions for a special issue on ethics and the legal profession to be published in June 2006, which will contain articles and comments from selected authors. The special issue seeks to include a broad range of subject areas and perspectives. Suggested topics include conflicts and the duty of loyalty, whistleblowing, the adversarial role, judicial ethics, emerging legal ethics issues from new technologies, parallels between legal ethics and other professions, the legal history of ethics,

One of our open-source savvy articling students, Jon Smithen, just drew my attention to a piece in this week’s Nature which strongly suggests that Wikipedia’s integrity in the scientific field approaches that of the conventional encyclopaedias. My experience on the legal side endorsed that view too. . . . [more]

Thanks to Ron Friedmann at Prism Legal for a piece from the AmLaw Texas publication entitled A Smaller Legal World – More and more companies are outsourcing work overseas — where the price is right

The story describes an American company that decided to abandon its regular US counsel for legal research services. I quote:

Gorton says he hired his primary law firm (which he wishes to keep anonymous) to conduct research on legal issues in half a dozen states. The firm’s fee came to nearly $250,000.

So Gorton approached an outsourcing company he had read about in Texas Lawyer. . . . [more]

At my old firm, we often wondered whether anyone in Canada read Lloyds Law Reports. We had a complete run, and served as the borrowing point of choice for most of Bay Street.
It was strange to see how closely they followed significant Canadian maritime cases, in much the same way as the American Maritime Cases did.
Today, an announcement of I-Law, which looks to be a portal for all of the Lloyds Law Report series.
i-law.com brings together in one online environment titles such as Lloyd’s Law Reports and Lloyd’s Maritime Law Newsletter; LLR: Insurance & Reinsurance . . . [more]

I received an email from a colleague that alerted me to a recent EU report entitled “DG Internal Market and Services Working Paper: First Evaluation of Directive 96/9/C on the Legal Protection of Databases” dated December 12, 2005.

This report suggests that database protection is not needed and did not provide the economic incentives that the database providers argued that such protection would provide.

I quote part of my colleague’s comments:

One of the issues that is lurking in the background at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is the notion of sui generis protection of databases (i.e.,

I don’t know about other jurisdictions, but a lot of significant changes to Ontario legislation are currently going through the Ontario Legislative Assembly. It is difficult to keep up, even for their own webmasters. At 11 a.m., I note they still haven’t posted changes from yesterday onto the website. If anyone is looking to track what happened to specific legislation the previous day, I highly recommend searching through the Votes and Proceedings (listed under “House Business” on the website).

One notable item: yesterday Bill 214, The Election Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005 had Third Reading and was passed according . . . [more]

In addition to the useful note by Olga Cabrero on LLRX, A Guide to the Spanish Legal System, I found a helpful piece specifically focussing on legal databases on Spanish law, which helps in getting around the deficiencies of the major services. See Evolución de las Bases de Datos Jurídicas en España

Apart from Ted’s LLRX piece, what would a Spanish researcher conclude about Canadian legal databases? . . . [more]

Thanks to ZiefBrief for this tidbit:

Tracking Down Treaties – Help Arrives From the Dep’t. of State
In Where Have All the Treaties Gone?, Duncan Hollis, one of the law professor authors of the international law and politics blog Opinio Juris, reports that (after a big nudge from Congress), the Department of State has added almost 1500 bilateral and multilateral treaties and other international agreements to its web site.

This is good news for legal researchers, since up until this point free government sources of recent U.S. treaties were very thin on the ground.

The collection begins in 1998, . . . [more]

I haven’t been posting to SLAW lately, due to end of term burn out, and travelling on university business. In my latest trip, I took with me the most recent issue of “The Walrus” for December/January. Now that Saturday Night has fizzled out, it has become my Canadian magazine of choice. So I’m not hesitant to plug it. In addition to some great articles on hydrogen fuel in Iceland, Japanese tea ceremonie in Halifax, etc., there was an article by Jeremy Keehn, “An open-source history of open source” – its a great one page graphic. Its worth checking out.

While . . . [more]

Take a look at PreviewSeek, a new search engine from the U.K. that claims to be better than Google and explains why.

It’s sleek and fast, I’ll say that for it. And it’s apparently a meta-search engine, querying the usual suspects (one suspects — though they don’t say) and then integrating the results. It also clusters its findings in a menu to the left of the main page, which can be helpful.

Funny how resistant one is to letting go of Google.

[via inter-alia] . . . [more]

Is anyone doing anything interesting with regard to profiling their users? Do you have an intake survey when they start at your firm (or law school)? Has anyone experimented with building profiles via online surveys?

I’ve been thinking lately that it would be a great resource (on a number of levels) if we could build detailed profiles of each of our lawyers – either by a paper or electronic questionnaire, or by extending the information we collect in the personal profiles area on our Intranet.

Also related, are you’re tracking Library reference questions in a unique way? or linking reference . . . [more]

Slaw readers know that Osgoode Hall Law School is currently recruiting new librarians (three positions advertised, more later next year). When we do have some new full-time staff on board one of the things I’d like to look seriously at is setting up exchanges with law firm librarians. The idea would be to promote knowledge and understanding of the way in which our respective users undertake research. I think it would be especially useful for academic librarians to have insight into the way in which lawyers use firm libraries, and the kind of information they seek – useful in that . . . [more]