Canada’s online legal magazine.

About Amy Salyzyn

Amy Salyzyn is an Associate Professor at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Common Law. Amy received her LL.M. from Yale Law School and her J.D. from the University of Toronto Law School. In addition to legal ethics, Amy’s research focuses on gender and the law, law and technology and civil justice reform.

Posts by Amy Salyzyn

Deceptive Dynamics of Generative AI: Beyond the “First-Year Associate” Framing

Generative AI and Self-Represented Litigants in Canada: What We Know and Where to Go

Straight-Up Made-Up: the Ongoing Saga of Problematic AI-Generated Legal Submissions

Canadian Lawyers and Generative AI: Some Suggested Starting Points for the Overwhelmed

Canadian Legal Ethics: 2024 Unwrapped

Canadian Courts and Generative AI: Broadening Our Gaze to Potential Corrosive Risks

Bad Ballots: Down With Direct Democracy in Law Society Governance

AI and Legal Ethics 3.0: Looking Beyond Professional Conduct Rules and Towards Independence of the Bar

Unavoidable AI?: The Increasing Ubiquity of Generative AI and Lawyers’ Duty of Technological Competence

Lawyers’ Ethics and Lawyer Regulation in 2023: Looking Back, Looking Ahead

AI and Legal Ethics 2.0: Continuing the Conversation in a Post-ChatGPT World

Time for Campaign Finance Reform for LSO Elections?

The ChatGPT Lawyer: Promises, Perils, and Practicalities

Regulating Former Judges: Why the Delay?

Pop Culture References in Canadian Judicial Decisions: Monty Python and Beyond

Supreme Fixers?

A Family Lawyer’s Duty to Discuss Reconciliation With Clients: Time for Change?

Keeping Secrets: A Lawyer’s Obligation Not to Disclose Confidential Information to Spouses and Significant Others

Workplace Misconduct by Canadian Judges

Challenging “Compelled Speech” Objections: Respectful Forms of Address in Canadian Courts

The Tax Court’s Muslim Screening Policy That Canadians Almost Didn’t Hear About

The Updated Ethical Principles for Judges: Reaction From the Canadian Association for Legal Ethics / Association Canadienne Pour L’ethique Juridique (CALE/ACEJ)

A Taxonomy of Judicial Technological Competence

Fingers Crossed for a Sandbox!

Not Everyone’s Lawyer?

A Taxonomy for Lawyer Technological Competence

Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Lawyers

Reporting Sexual Harassment: A New Professional Duty for Lawyers?

“Trial by Zoom”: What Virtual Hearings Might Mean for Open Courts, Participant Privacy and the Integrity of Court Proceedings

Judges Need Ethics Rules, Not Just Ethical Guidance

3li_EnFr_Wordmark_W

This project has been made possible in part by the Government of Canada | Ce projet a été rendu possible en partie grâce au gouvernement du Canada