In a unanimous decision written by the Chief Justice The Supreme Court ruled in Charkaoui et. al. that the security certificate scheme violates section 7 of the Charter and is not saved by section 1.
In a unanimous decision written by the Chief Justice The Supreme Court ruled in Charkaoui et. al. that the security certificate scheme violates section 7 of the Charter and is not saved by section 1. [click on the author's name for more information] 2 Comments on “Charkaoui Wins” |
the count:
Simon Fodden on Images in Judgments Daniel Poulin on Images in Judgments John G on The Friday Fillip: Randomness Kim Nayyer on Shoes and Dominoes Adam Dodek on Mandated or Mandatory Pro Bono Gary P. Rodrigues on What's Hot on CanLII This Week Robert Janes on Mandated or Mandatory Pro Bono George Beaton on Director of Innovation for Law Firms? Bonnie Czegledi on Crime and Cultural Property Nate Russell on The New Mega-Journal David Cheifetz on Court Nullifies 2011 Federal Election Results in Etobicoke Centre Victoria Lehman on Real Looking Scams Require Lawyers to Be Warier Than Ever Simon Fodden on Supreme Court Brochure Omar Ha-Redeye on Supreme Court Brochure Lyonette Louis-Jacques on Images in Judgments SlawTips |
|
|
||
Scooped by yourself, two posts down
Nope. Wasn't me who modified my "imminent" post. Anyone?