RSS feed notwithstanding, it has been a while since I have spent some time on one of my all-time favourite legal research sites, The Virtual Chase, written by the amazing Genie Tyburski at Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll LLP. I must visit more often. An interesting article by Genie from a couple of weeks ago poses the question "Can We Throw Away the Books Yet?". As she explains in the article, the query flows from the premise suggested by a colleague that "…print as a medium was losing ground. And assuming his suppositions were true, he expressed concern that those who continue to conduct research primarily through the books would soon become inefficient, costly and possibly, negligent researchers." She reviews the numbers and her thoughts and conclusions are interesting. Whereas the growth of availability of electronic information clearly outpaces that of print, publication and purchase of print information remains significant. However, she notes, not surprisingly, that print researchers may be a dying breed. Her recommendations:
- Evaluate the use of the print collection. The availability of multiple publishing formats means there is redundancy. If primary materials, in particular, still occupy physical space, weigh the cost of maintaining them against the cost of educating those who use them about alternate research methods.
- Partner skilled researchers with new lawyers. Because of the amount of information available today, the number of access choices, and the limited subject knowledge of a new lawyer, it likely will take several years to develop adequate legal research skills. Regular opportunity to observe and practice research is essential.
- Within reason, allow for experimentation. New information channels develop at a much faster pace today. Consider channels that have come to light in just the past 10 years – chat (AOL, 1997), streaming multimedia (RealPlayer, 1997), peer-to-peer file sharing, blogs, RSS and podcasts. Through experimentation, you will discover new, and sometimes better, ways of delivering information. (For example, by using instant messaging – or IM-like software – you can deliver real-time reference service and on-demand information to lawyers or clients beyond your immediate physical location.)
Respond: make a comment | read the 2 comments
Share:
Email
|
Save as PDF | Print
|
Bookmark & Share
|
|
More: in Miscellaneous | from Kim Nayyer
|
the count:
8634 posts | 11926 comments
recent comments  
Following on our earlier Top 10 Financial Errors posts, this is the first in a series of 10 posts dealing with Cash Flow Reports and in particular, cash flow management.… »»Practice Today’s research tip is about facts. When research is assigned to juniors (and librarians for that matter) it is important to share facts that are critical to the research. It … »»Research If you are using Office 2007 or 2010, The Ribbon is now a part of your life. Some of you will be happy about this – some of you won’t.… »»Technology
-
-
-
Available online today are four new chapters of the publication Women in Canada: A Gender-based Statistical Report, which explores the socio-demographic and economic circumstances of Canadian women in general.
-
The bill amends the Constitution Act, 1867 by readjusting the number of members and the representation of the provinces in the House of Commons.
-
-
Blueseed plans to buy a ship and turn it into a floating incubator anchored in international waters off the coast of California.
-
Under Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the flow of information out of Ottawa has slowed to a trickle.
-
-
"…the IPC has exclusive jurisdiction to decide whether a record is in the custody or control of a university in the context of an access request…"
-
These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.
-
Aliens - Exclusion and expulsion - Power to detain and deport - Minister’s certificate - Review - Evidence
In 2002, Harkat was detained pursuant to a ministerial security certificate issued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) as a person inadmissible to Canada on grounds ...
-
Contracts - Formation of contract - Signing - Electronic signature
The plaintiff expressed an interest in purchasing the defendant’s (vendor’s) condo. The parties agreed to carry on their discussions through e-mail. Following an exchange of e-mails, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was contractually bound to ...
-
Barristers and Solicitors - Relationship with client - Confidential communications - General
The petitioner was a Receiver appointed in March 2009 by a California court over the assets of GJB Enterprises Inc. (a “Ponzi scheme”) and its principals, the Berkes (the GJB parties). The court ordered ...
-
Practice - Costs - Funding before judgment - When interim or advance costs available
The plaintiffs were “direct to home” satellite based subscription program providers. Rex and other defendants offered “grey market” services to Canadian residents to facilitate the unauthorized reception in Canada of the plaintiffs’ ...
This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.
Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.
Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.
|
Uhu ? So, as I wrote previously in a comment to another post here, you're no longer a good librarian or lawyer if you don't do all your research online ?
The content or what contains it — which is more important ? The speed with which you get the information is no doubt very important in our information society age, that's right, and that depends on the container. But I know very experienced lawyers who don't like and don't use digital research who go to the paper library and get the right book and exit more quickly than some younger lawyers who are very skilled at doing online research. And just today a 4-year experienced associate aks me for some references in French law reviews : I found once again that we were quicker in getting the print versions and photocopying them than in searching and printing them online. So ?
There are a lot of jurisdictions where paper rules and/or where the bosses prefer paper, you know ?
And about the immediate messaging software, RSS etc. — which I know and have been using for quite some time but at a slow rate : it's all very well if you have some time to read and answer the growing number of messages (there already are the 100 or so e-mails per day, you know ?) — that is, provided you don't work 15 hours per day.
I generally sum up my views on the paper/print/online debate with the classic Robert Palmer song title — " ' Takes every kind of people to make the world go round". I for one prefer to take the best of both worlds — the paper/print one and the online one. Details are here (in French) :
Papier contre numérique ou papier avec numérique ?
http://www.precisement.org/blog/article.php3?id_article=63
Emmanuel, I don't think there are many around Slaw that will debate the fact that there are times when paper sources are required. Or that some lawyers will prefer paper because that's what they understand and trust. However, the simple fact remains that our sources are moving towards electronic, and that paper is simply *fitting* less and less.
The bigger problem I see is the lack of coverage, especially on retrospective collections. Where budgets have allowed for electronic conversion of certain materials, and that conversion process has stopped at a certain date and does not include the entire collection. As you say, it doesn't matter where you get the content, just that you can get it.
Your comparison of a savvy paper researcher to a younger lawyer is probably a bit of apples-n-oranges. A savvy researcher is going to be faster in most cases, paper or electronic, simply on experience with their tool of choice.
And one other point about the virtue of electronic over paper would be the digitization of the content for further work processes. If you deliver to your users printed copies vs photocopies, this will make no difference. But if you emailed your users pdf's, and the research was intended to be used in work product, the simple availability of copy-paste functionality will probably save someone copy typing portions of that research into a new document.
And finally, thank-you for the comments you've been submitting to Slaw Emmanuel, it's this type of conversation that keeps us all engaged.