I posted earlier this week (see Privacy, Social Media, Targeting and Marketing: Poked and Pwnd) about recent updates on privacy practices online. Noted was Facebook's announcement that users would be asked to update their settings to allow better and easier controls for users over their posted information. Facebook users were certainly asked yesterday to update their settings: but I had to blink twice. The update screen gave the choice (i) to keep the user's old, often customized settings (e.g. restricted to friends only and/or with other customizations for restricted access) or (ii) to allow viewers to access more information about the user than before (such as everyone, or friends of friends). Where the privacy controls had been "upgraded" was not clear to me. Furthermore, the Independent reports that some privacy advocates are criticizing Facebook for pushing users to expose even more of their information than ever before.

Slate today reports a further strange development: was it as a result of the privacy setting updates, or for some other reason, that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg suddenly began sharing his entire profile? According to Gawker.com apparently including over 290 personal photos of Mr. Zuckerberg suddenly became viewable, and Gawker.com posted a selection of them in an online gallery.

In today's online version of the site's page A guide to privacy on Facebook, Facebook makes various recommendations to users about the level of their privacy settings. Curiously, rather than emphasizing the ability to tightly restrict viewing of their information, Facebook's recommendations include:

"We recommend Everyone be able to see information that will make it easier for friends to find, identify and learn about you. This includes basic information like your About Me description, Family and Relationships, Work and Education Info, and Website, as well as posts that you create, like photo albums and status updates."

Also:

"Some information is more personal, so we recommend Friends of Friends be able to see that type of info. This includes the settings for your Birthday, Religious and Political views, Hometown, and Photos and Videos of Me, which is all the photos and videos you've been tagged in."

Furthermore:

"We are committed to protecting minors who use Facebook. Until their eighteenth birthday, minors will have their information limited to Friends of Friends and Networks."

Although the page recommends that contact information be limited to viewing by Friends only, the page's recommendations to share more personal information with those who are not Friends, the defaults for minors being set to groups wider than Friends, and the recent settings update initiative, seems to conflict with the purpose of upgrading privacy settings to allow for better control, or restrictions, on what others can view. On one hand, Facebook can be lauded for giving the users many options to restrict closely the level of access to their information. On the other hand, it's not clear that the latest changes make users aware of this functionality, or make it easy for them to put these controls in place.

Jeanette practices in the areas of intellectual property, marketing/advertising, technology and entertainment law with the firm of Stohn Hay Cafazzo Dembroski Richmond LLP. Her practice has an emphasis on intellectual property acquisition and protection, film and television production, licensing, publishing, brand strategy and leveraging, advertising and marketing compliance and privacy issues.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

3 Comments on “Part II: Privacy & Social Media: Poked & Pwned”

  1. Pamela Egan says:

    Personally, I've stopped worrying about my own privacy online. As a professional, you really have to choose between marketing yourself and maintaining your privacy. I obviously chose the former.

    I do worry about my kids, however. In particular, I worry that my daughter and sons may be putting too much information about themselves out there for the entire world to see. I suppose that's just being a mother, though…

  2. Privacy groups filed a complaint today with the FTC, saying the changes break privacy laws.

  3. Jeanette Lee says:

    Thanks, Omar. I saw that and posted about it today.
    Comments are appreciated! Keep them coming.

SlawTips      

SlawTips Top 10 Financial Errors: #8 Always Assume More Risk Than Needed
Friday, February 3

You should assess whether you can accept the financial risks associated with taking the matter, just as clients will assess whether they can (and will) pay your fee. Spend time at the beginning of the. […] »»

Practice

SlawTips Seeing New Federal Legislation
Wednesday, February 1

Today’s Tip is a simple reminder to view by “latest activity date”. The Parliament is back in session and those Slaw Tips readers for whom monitoring legislation is a regular … »»

Research

SlawTips Top 10 Financial Errors: #7 Put Off Dealing With Underperforming Lawyers
Friday, January 27

When everyone in the firm is required to report monthly to all other partners, you instill a culture in the firm that is self-correcting. If someone fails to regularly meet their financial goals, you. […] »»

Practice

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Banks and Banking - Liability of banks to third parties - Negligence - General

    The plaintiffs were the former shareholders of a company that failed. They sued the defendant bank alleging that it breached its contract with the company and the plaintiffs and breached a duty ...

  • Actions - Cause of action - General principles - New or extended cause of action - Opening of floodgates

    The plaintiff and defendant worked at different branches of the same bank. The defendant’s common-law husband was the plaintiff’s ex-husband. Over a four year period, the defendant ...

  • Aliens - Definitions and general principles - Immigration consultants

    The Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) had been designated as the sole regulatory body of immigration consultants in Canada from 2004 until June 2011. On June 30, 2011, Bill C-35 came into force, which significantly amended ...

  • Criminal Law - Sexual offences, public morals and disorderly conduct - Public morals - Obscenity - Possession of child pornography

    The accused was convicted of making child pornography available and two counts of possession of child pornography (see [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 197). Subsequently, he was sentenced ...

  • Criminal Law - Procedure - Charge or directions - Jury or judge alone - Directions regarding pleas or evidence of witnesses, co-accused and accomplices

    Rowe was convicted by a jury of five offences. He appealed.

    The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed ...

  • Narcotic Control - Offences - Possession - General

    The accused wished to access marijuana for medicinal purposes but did not have an authorization to possess marijuana issued under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations. He was notified that a package of marihuana addressed to him had been ...

  • Narcotic Control - General - Legislation - Exemptions - Medicinal marijuana

    McCrady, who had an application pending under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) to possess and grow marijuana, was convicted of possession of marijuana (Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), s. 4(1)). Hearn pleaded guilty ...

  • Criminal Law - Sentence - Trafficking in hashish or marijuana (incl. possession for purposes of trafficking)

    The accused pleaded guilty to one count of possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking. He was sentenced to 30 days’ imprisonment to be served intermittently and 11 months’ ...

  • Municipal Law - Powers of municipalities - Particular powers - Imposition and collection of taxes or fees 

    Catalyst Paper Corp. operated a paper mill in the District of North Cowichan. Catalyst objected to the tax rate that it paid compared to residential ratepayers. In 2009, the ...


law foundation icon

The re-development
of Slaw is assisted by
a grant from the
Law Foundation of Ontario

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.

Switch to our mobile site