In 2008 Parliament passed the Statutes Repeal Act, aimed at clearing out those portions of federal legislation that have passed, assented to, but not declared in force for, effectively, a decade. That Act was itself proclaimed in force in June of 2010.

Under its provisions, each year the Minister of Justice is to draw up a list of appropriate candidates and present it to the Senate and Commons within five days of the first sitting in the calendar year. Specifically, a target is any statutory provisions that


    2….
    (a) was assented to nine years or more before the December 31 immediately preceding the laying of the report; and
    (b) had not come into force on or before that December 31.

The hammer is found in section 3, which provides that anything in the report is repealed on December 31 of the year in which the report is made, unless it is brought into force or otherwise saved by Parliament. Thus there's a broom with a ten year (9 years without being "in force" + a year to think about it) long handle sweeping up behind our legislators.

There are a mere 45 items on this year's kill list. I haven't been through them to see if there are any surprises, but if you find something of interest there, let us know in the comments.

Simon Fodden is the founder of Slaw. He taught law at Osgoode Hall Law School for more than 30 years before he retired to focus on writing, publishing, and IT and law.
[click on the author's name for more information]

up

2 Comments on “House Cleaning: Federal Statutes Repeal Act”

  1. John G says:

    Ontario has the same provision (copied from the federal one) as s. 10.1 of the Legislation Act, 2006. The first list was tabled on March 1, 2011. A report will be required next year about what became of the items on the list (and of course a new list will be required next year of the statutes that fall into the ten-year unproclaimed class.)

  2. Rick says:

    With regard to the long broom handle – is it a short handle ? Is this a “may” or “shall” statute bringing these unproclaimed pieces of legislation ? In other words, how much discretion ? For example, for the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act — R.S., 1985, c. 33 (2nd Supp.) we find in the current Table of Public Statutes “Parts II and III or any of those Parts shall come into force on a day or days to be fixed by Proclamation – Not in force”. Parts II and III deal with STANDARD HOURS, WAGES, LEAVE, ETC. and OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ? Though Part I was in force as of 24 December 1986 ?

Make a comment:

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products, that make personal attacks, or that seek personal legal advice.

Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.

 

SlawTips      

SlawTips Cash Flow Reports – Part 2
Thursday, May 24

This is the second in a series of ten tips dealing with cash flow reports and cash flow management. Gregory Nunn once said: “Never underestimate the value of cold cash.”… »»

Practice

SlawTips United Nations Documents
Wednesday, May 23

Today’s Tip: Monitor UN documents with RSS Since I last looked, the United Nations Documents site has a new look and feel. For what the site is trying to deliver, … »»

Research

SlawTips Updated Version of Great Social Media Guide for Lawyers Released
Wednesday, May 23

Last spring, Meritas’ Leadership Institute released a Social Media Guide for Lawyers. This helpful resource provided lawyers with an overview of the three main social media tools — LinkedIn, Faceb. […] »»

Technology

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.

  • Aliens - Exclusion and expulsion - Power to detain and deport - Minister’s certificate - Review - Evidence

    In 2002, Harkat was detained pursuant to a ministerial security certificate issued under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) as a person inadmissible to Canada on grounds ...

  • Contracts - Formation of contract - Signing - Electronic signature

    The plaintiff expressed an interest in purchasing the defendant’s (vendor’s) condo. The parties agreed to carry on their discussions through e-mail. Following an exchange of e-mails, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was contractually bound to ...

  • Barristers and Solicitors - Relationship with client - Confidential communications - General

    The petitioner was a Receiver appointed in March 2009 by a California court over the assets of GJB Enterprises Inc. (a “Ponzi scheme”) and its principals, the Berkes (the GJB parties). The court ordered ...

  • Practice - Costs - Funding before judgment - When interim or advance costs available

    The plaintiffs were “direct to home” satellite based subscription program providers. Rex and other defendants offered “grey market” services to Canadian residents to facilitate the unauthorized reception in Canada of the plaintiffs’ ...

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.