Archive for ‘Substantive Law’
International Association of Law Libraries 2014
The 2014 course on International Law and Legal Information from the International Association of Law Libraries is taking place right now in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Of particular interest are the Tweets being posted to Twitter with the tag #IALL2014. Today’s content is focussed largely on human rights issues.
Related links:
- #IALL2014 on Twitter
- IALL 2014 Annual course website
- Full conference programme is here (PDF)
- International Association of Law Libraries (main website)
“Strengthening” Citizenship May Weaken Economy
Bill C-24—the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act, which passed its third reading on June 16, 2014, is already facing considerable scrutiny.
Of particular concern are the revocation clauses, which would provide the government to strip a Canadian of his or her citizenship, even if they were born in the country. This could result in the deportation of a person to a country they have never even been in.
This type of scenario was envisioned in the Maher Arar fiasco, where a Canadian was deported from New York with Canadian assistance to Syria and tortured there, in a country where . . . [more]
Shocking Communications With a Job Applicant Cost Employer $8,000 in Damages
The Trouble With Kerning and Spacing
Writing clearly and concisely is a goal that often eludes lawyers, especially when writing factums.
Justice Barbier of the United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana ruled on a motion on Sept. 15, 2014 in the complex litigation surrounding the BP oil spill, In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010.
Although denying the motion, Justice Barbier commented on the response by BP, in particular in their formatting:
. . . [more]…the Court must address the format of BP’s opposition memorandum.
The briefing order allowed BP’s counsel to file a
Employee Constructively Dismissed Because of a Temporary Layoff
Short Updates: A Thank-You to Eugene Meehan
The amount of information required to stay abreast of the changing law, in a general sense, is massive. Supreme Court of Canada statistics tell us that there were over 70 decisions to read from that court alone every year. Add your jurisdiction’s Court of Appeal and trial courts decisions, federal and provincial legislative changes, tribunal decisions, municipal and other delegated legislation and you have way more material than any generalist can reasonably consume.
Of course you don’t need to know it all. Many of those pieces of legal information can be learned just in time rather than just in case. . . . [more]
Online Dispute Resolution at UNCITRAL – Some Creativity Needed
The UNCITRAL Working Group on Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) meets next month in Vienna to continue discussion of model rules for international ODR. Here are the working documents for the meeting, and past meetings. .
The perspective of the project since its inception in 2010 has been to find a way to resolve high-volume, low-value disputes – not necessarily just consumer disputes, but many would be of this kind.
One of the problems has been to figure out a way to get both buyers and sellers into the ODR system, whatever it is (and there might be many such . . . [more]
CASL Software Provisions
CASL – the Canadian anti-spam legislation – contains provisions that require certain disclosure and permission requirements on the installation of software that does certain things, or when software does certain things. This aspect of CASL has been overshadowed by the anti-spam provisions, in part because the software provisions are not in effect until January 15, 2015.
Unfortunately these software provisions are not easy to comprehend or apply in practice. There is a lot of uncertainty around their interpretation. And IMHO they are going to cause far more harm than good. There is a real danger that some software creators will . . . [more]
Bush-Era Legal Memos on Warrantless Wiretapping
The legal memos from 2004, over a decade ago, outlining the power of the President to use wiretapping, have been obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union and Electronic Privacy Information Center.
The project was called Stellar Wind, and allowed the National Security Agency (NSA) to collect information, even when it was contained in the U.S., as long as one end of the communications was overseas and a party was believed to be connected to terrorism.
Jack Goldsmith, Assistant Attorney General at the time, wrote in a memo from May 2004,
. . . [more]…the
Australian Law Reform Commission Report Into Serious Invasions of Privacy
The Australian Law Reform Commission released a report earlier this week on Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era .
The report proposes a new tort remedy for invasions of privacy that are serious, committed intentionally or recklessly and that cannot be justified as being in the public interest — for example, posting sexually explicit photos of someone on the Web without their permission, a topic much in the news recently because of the massive leak of nude photos of some of Hollywood’s biggest female celebrities.
The document also recommends a range of defences to protect free speech: . . . [more]
