It’s Thanksgiving Day, so we’ll be light on entries — but heavy on eating — today.

But before the feasting begins I wanted to say “thank you” to everyone who reads Slaw. We’re grateful that you take the time to see what we have to say.

And if you have a moment to spare, read a bit about what may have been the first thanksgiving ceremony performed by Europeans on North American soil, here in Canada in 1578. . . . [more]

The Maytree Foundation has just released a report by Naomi Alboim and Karen Cohl, Shaping the future: Canada’s rapidly changing immigration policies. The report reviews the immigration reforms between 2008-2012, the pace and scope of which are unprecedented in Canada, according to the authors.

The vast majority of these changes impact Canada negatively, the authors claim. Some of the most problematic changes include:

• conditional permanent residence for spouses and entrepreneurs
• treating refugees differently based on country of origin
• more difficult citizenship procedures
• a focus on short-term labour market needs, rather than long-term nation building
• inconsistent policies which lack predictability

The New York Times has a story about hackers who have broken into servers at 53 universities and have published online certain student records and other data.

The universities concerned are principally in the United States but include some in other countries. Two Canadian universities have had their servers hacked: the University of British Columbia and McMaster University.

I’ve followed up the hyperlinks provided and find that data from both these universities is openly available online at the time of writing. . . . [more]

Here’s a neat graphic summarizing the many ways in which social media interrupts us and erodes productivity, based, I think, on this Microsoft study. Conveniently, there’s an app for that. . . . [more]

This is a guest post by Carissima Mathen, who is an Associate Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Ottawa.

Having done an initial pass of the Supreme Court decisions issued today, my main sentiment is….admiration (not least, for the unanimous opinion). I think the Supreme Court has done its utmost to consider all sides, even if I don’t necessarily agree with everything it said.

First, some background. The Mabior 2012 SCC 47 and DC 2012 SCC 48 appeals presented the Court’s first opportunity since 1998 to consider the difficult issue of how the law should . . . [more]

Microsoft has announced that its new Internet Explorer 10 browser will block the tracking of users’ browsing records by advertisers. There will be a ‘do not track’ command that will be turned on by default, though users can turn it off.

According to this Outlaw.com story, the American Association of National Advertisers has complained about this. Tracking, it says, allows for advertising better targeted to users’ interests, thus more likely to be effective, thus more lucrative for the advertisers, thus providing more money to support the ‘free’ content on the Internet. Blocking tracking by default ‘takes the information out . . . [more]

Who is this dapper fellow, you might ask? He’s a California gold miner, and he’s sporting one of the first pairs of Levi Strauss’s serge de Nîmes pants. What makes them special, apart from the fact they’re made of denim, is the use of rivets at the critical joints, an invention that Strauss’s partner, Jacob Davis, patented in 1873. The image is from that patent application, as is the following:

My invention relates to a fastening for pocket-openings, whereby the sewed seams are prevented from ripping or starting from frequent pressure or strain thereon; and it consists in the

Most lawyers and law firms know what they should be doing to maintain a secure computing environment in order to comply with ethics rules regarding confidentiality, as well as data breach notification laws. This list includes maintaining firewalls and up-to-date anti-virus and anti-malware, maintaining vigilance when opening attachments and surfing the Internet, using strong and different passwords for each important login, scrutinizing the security protocols of cloud providers, maintaining adequate backup files, and keeping operating systems patched. However, there are still reports almost daily of companies – and even law firms – experience breaches. What else can be done to . . . [more]

This is a post in a series appearing each Friday, setting out some articles, videos, podcasts and the like that contributors at Slaw are enjoying and that you might find interesting. The articles tend to be longer than blog posts and shorter than books, just right for that stolen half hour on the weekend. It’s also likely that most of them won’t be about law — just right for etc.

Please let us have your recommendations for what we and our readers might like.

[Broken record on]

Smith v. Moshrefzadeh, 2012 BCSC 1458  is a motor vehicle [accident], personal injury action. Liability was admitted. The issue was how much.

The chart shows what the the plaintiff claimed, the defence position, and the award.

This is what the trial said the law was that determined whether the defendant’s negligence was a cause.

 [59] The primary test to be applied in determining causation is commonly articulated as the “but for” test: a defendant will be fully liable for the harm suffered by a plaintiff, even if other causal factors were at play, so long as

The U.S.-based blog Free Government Information was launched a few years ago by a group of academic librarians who wanted to raise public awareness of the importance of better access to all forms of government information.

They occasionally have guest bloggers and this month’s guest will be a real treat for history buffs, archive geeks, hard core freedom of information fans and investigative reporter types: Malcolm Byrne from the National Security Archive, a non-governmental organization based at George Washington University that specializes in declassified documents.

His first post is about the Archive’s work on the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis . . . [more]

I was reading at a fairly innocuous post on Lawyers.com today, titled “The Advantages of Selling Your Own Home“, and noted the DIY nature of the topic. The coverage was fair; comparing the pluses and minuses of selling your own home, and few would likely find it controversial. I can see how many realtors would even tolerate it, as it describes a small section of the marketplace; and the numbers don’t lie — few people clearly have the time or savvy to sell their own home.

However, I would say this: if this was my site, I wouldn’t . . . [more]