November 30, 2009
Gary P.
Rodrigues
Free Access Is Here to Stay
by Gary P. Rodrigues
November 30, 2009
Free access to legal information in Canada is here to stay. Of that fact, there can be no doubt.
Bob Berring, the man who has triggered the recent Slaw debate on the future viability of free services, sounds like a man from the past, nurtured on West and Lexis and very happy with the services that they provide. Like him, I visited the West editorial offices early in my career and was equally impressed by West’s ability to gather free content, add editorial value, and sell and resell public records to the legal profession. I was also impressed on my first visit to Lexis in Dayton by that company’s ability to build and deliver the same content online.
More recently, however, I visited LexUM at the University of Montreal and concluded that they have what it takes to effectively challenge the commercial providers of legal information on their own turf, i.e., a clear vision combined with entrepreneurial leadership, a focus on legal information, a stable infra-stucture staffed by professional “free access to law” publishers with reliable core funding, and a demonstrated ability to build and distribute innovative products that clearly meet customer needs.
Like Bob Berring, I also recall saying many times that governments and volunteer organizations that depend in whole or in part on government funding would be unreliable providers of these services and that a user could expect that future budget cutbacks would disrupt or terminate any service being provided. Only a commercial provider could be expected to provide the consistent uninterrupted service required by the legal profession. However, unlike Bob Berring, I came to believe that what I was saying was wrong. If asked for my opinion today, I would say something like the following:
Free access is established
Canadian lawyers have been conditioned to expect access to legal information online to be a free service. Throughout their professional training, lawyers as law students were given free access to value added primary content, from both the commercial publishers and from free services such as CANLII. In the circumstances, it is only natural for the legal profession to expect that access should continue to be free while practicing law and to be prepared to collectively support initiatives that would make it happen. Governments also have an obligation to provide access to the law. In the online era, it has become expected that governments do so at no cost to citizens who wish to have access to legal information. The result is an ever increasing array of sophisticated free services that provide access to legislation and the decisions of courts and administrative tribunals.
Free access costs money
Of course, free access to legal information does not mean that the product is produced at no cost. Someone has to pay for its creation and distribution. Apart from governments, the leading non-profit provider of free legal information in Canada is CANLII, an entity owned by the Federation of Law Societies and built in collaboration with LexUM. In a recent post, Catherine Best stated that CANLII is funded by an annual levy on law society members of $30 per member. The actual cost to a lawyer of building and maintaining CANLII is less than a quarter of the cost of the purchase of a single bound volume of a law report series. The value for money is clear.
Free services are as stable as commercial services
Historically, Canadian commercial legal publishers have had an uneven track record as providers of legal information. The current smooth functioning of the market has not been the norm. Apart from Canada Law Book’s core law report series, commercial legal publishing includes many false starts and discontinued products. By contrast, the Ontario Reports published by the Law Society of Upper Canada, and government publications such as the Ontario Labour Relations Board Reports, have been published without interruption from their launch date. While budgets of governments and law societies can be cut, and products like online services curtailed or discontinued, the same is true for commercial legal publishers who also operate within a budgetary framework. Cuts can be expected in a tough year or whenever a product no longer makes economic sense.
Free services are as innovative as commercial services
Free services have proven themselves to be innovative to be innovative and increasingly competitive with the commercial publishers. There are many examples of this including CANLII/LexUM’s point in time legislation with screens that permit the user to view more than one version of the legislation at the same time, as well as government services such as Ontario’s elaws and administrative tribunal websites like the Ontario Securities Commission which are equally innovative in their presentation of legal information.
Free services and commercial services will co-exist for some time to come
Like Mr. Beering, I believe that the commercial publishers will continue to be at the centre of online legal research. As so many have said on Slaw and elsewhere, the most efficient and cost effective starting point for high quality legal research is secondary content, supplemented of course by online searches of legislation and case law. It is the commercial legal publishers who have developed and published the treatises and monographs that comprise the legal literature of Canada and who have the capability of offering online services that integrate secondary and primary content online. So long as the commercial legal publishers continue to develop, publish and add high quality secondary content their services, they will hold their position in the market, but always with the free services nipping at their heals and forcing them to up their game. This is a good thing.
Free access to legal information in Canada is here to stay. Of that fact, there can be no doubt.
Bob Berring, the man who has triggered the recent Slaw debate on the future viability of free services, sounds like a man from the past, nurtured on West and Lexis and very happy with the services that they provide. Like him, I visited the West editorial offices early in my career and was equally impressed by West’s ability to gather free content, add editorial value, and sell and resell public records to the legal profession. I was also impressed on my first visit to Lexis in Dayton by that company’s ability to build and deliver the same content online.
More recently, however, I visited LexUM at the University of Montreal and concluded that they have what it takes to effectively challenge the commercial providers of legal information on their own turf, i.e., a clear vision combined with entrepreneurial leadership, a focus on legal information, a stable infra-stucture staffed by professional “free access to law” publishers with reliable core funding, and a demonstrated ability to build and distribute innovative products that clearly meet customer needs.
Like Bob Berring, I also recall saying many times that governments and volunteer organizations that depend in whole or in part on government funding would be unreliable providers of these services and that a user could expect that future budget cutbacks would disrupt or terminate any service being provided. Only a commercial provider could be expected to provide the consistent uninterrupted service required by the legal profession. However, unlike Bob Berring, I came to believe that what I was saying was wrong. If asked for my opinion today, I would say something like the following:
Free access is established
Canadian lawyers have been conditioned to expect access to legal information online to be a free service. Throughout their professional training, lawyers as law students were given free access to value added primary content, from both the commercial publishers and from free services such as CANLII. In the circumstances, it is only natural for the legal profession to expect that access should continue to be free while practicing law and to be prepared to collectively support initiatives that would make it happen. Governments also have an obligation to provide access to the law. In the online era, it has become expected that governments do so at no cost to citizens who wish to have access to legal information. The result is an ever increasing array of sophisticated free services that provide access to legislation and the decisions of courts and administrative tribunals.
Free access costs money
Of course, free access to legal information does not mean that the product is produced at no cost. Someone has to pay for its creation and distribution. Apart from governments, the leading non-profit provider of free legal information in Canada is CANLII, an entity owned by the Federation of Law Societies and built in collaboration with LexUM. In a recent post, Catherine Best stated that CANLII is funded by an annual levy on law society members of $30 per member. The actual cost to a lawyer of building and maintaining CANLII is less than a quarter of the cost of the purchase of a single bound volume of a law report series. The value for money is clear.
Free services are as stable as commercial services
Historically, Canadian commercial legal publishers have had an uneven track record as providers of legal information. The current smooth functioning of the market has not been the norm. Apart from Canada Law Book’s core law report series, commercial legal publishing includes many false starts and discontinued products. By contrast, the Ontario Reports published by the Law Society of Upper Canada, and government publications such as the Ontario Labour Relations Board Reports, have been published without interruption from their launch date. While budgets of governments and law societies can be cut, and products like online services curtailed or discontinued, the same is true for commercial legal publishers who also operate within a budgetary framework. Cuts can be expected in a tough year or whenever a product no longer makes economic sense.
Free services are as innovative as commercial services
Free services have proven themselves to be innovative to be innovative and increasingly competitive with the commercial publishers. There are many examples of this including CANLII/LexUM’s point in time legislation with screens that permit the user to view more than one version of the legislation at the same time, as well as government services such as Ontario’s elaws and administrative tribunal websites like the Ontario Securities Commission which are equally innovative in their presentation of legal information.
Free services and commercial services will co-exist for some time to come
Like Mr. Beering, I believe that the commercial publishers will continue to be at the centre of online legal research. As so many have said on Slaw and elsewhere, the most efficient and cost effective starting point for high quality legal research is secondary content, supplemented of course by online searches of legislation and case law. It is the commercial legal publishers who have developed and published the treatises and monographs that comprise the legal literature of Canada and who have the capability of offering online services that integrate secondary and primary content online. So long as the commercial legal publishers continue to develop, publish and add high quality secondary content their services, they will hold their position in the market, but always with the free services nipping at their heals and forcing them to up their game. This is a good thing.
Respond: make a comment
Share: Email | Save as PDF | Print
| Bookmark & Share
More: in Miscellaneous | from Gary P. Rodrigues
Make a comment:
Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice.
Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.
|
the count:
6106 pages & posts | 8404 comments
... a per saltum project from Slaw ...
Our simple-to-remember rewriting of the URL for the Supreme Court of Canada — And lessupremes.ca works as well, bien sûr.
Gavel Busters
It's time to bring the hammer down on Canadian sites that mistakenly use the gavel as a symbol of law. Help us wipe out this scourge! Learn more on our Gavel Busters page.
The Friday Fillip Collections
Some end-of-week frivols fastened in folios for your enjoyment ...
Selected Fillips from 2006 2007
[2008 2009 coming soon ... ]
Slawstalgia
See how things used to be on Slaw:
-
the page from June 5, 2006, when we'd be going for just about a year...
-
the page from May 13, 2010 [PDF], nearly four years later...
-
Currently the Web largely uses IPv4, Internet Protocol version 4. Each IPv4 address is limited to a 32-bit number, which means there are a maximum of just over 4 billion unique addresses. IPv6 is the next generation Internet Protocol and uses a 128-bit address, so it supports a vastly larger number of unique addresses. Enough, in fact, to give every person on the planet over 4 billion addresses!
-
Paul Ceglia sued Facebook and Zuckerberg in state court June 30, claiming that an April 2003 contract entitles him to ownership of most of the closely held company. Ceglia’s lawyer produced a copy of the document for U.S. District Judge Richard Arcara today at a hearing in federal court in Buffalo, New York.
-
-
"click here to sign out forever" Nice
-
From blogs to Twitter to Facebook, companies and firms are leveraging the power of social networking as a business tool. A look at Canadian business use of social networking.
-
‘I was trying to keep the criminals out,’ police chief says there never was a five-metre arrest rule.
-
Police dealing with G20 demonstrators can use sonic cannons for crowd control, but with restrictions, Superior Court of Justice Mr. David Brown ruled this morning, reports The Star's Peter Edwards.
But he ruled Toronto police can only use the noise blasters at the lower decibel range. Ontario Provincial Police still have the discretion to use the cannons at both the lower and highest decibel settings, the judge said, because their guidelines for use are more cautious. That means the OPP can't come right up to someone and blast them.
The justice stressed that the OPP were not permitted to use the cannons at random. "Their use requires very serious authorization," he said. Crowd safety would benefit from police having a quick and effective means of communicating with protesters, he said.
-
"Just 10% of Twitter users generate more than 90% of the content, a Harvard study of 300,000 users found."
-
"Technology experts and stakeholders say they expect they will ‘live mostly in the cloud’ in 2020 and not on the desktop, working mostly through cyberspace-based applications accessed through networked devices. This will substantially advance mobile connectivity through smartphones and other internet appliances. Many say there will be a cloud-desktop hybrid. Still, cloud computing has many difficult hurdles to overcome, including concerns tied to the availability of broadband spectrum, the ability of diverse systems to work together, security, privacy, and quality of service."
-
. . . interesting article . . . about a researcher who is looking into technology or methods to allow personal data to "fade" over time.
|
