More Readers for Legal Scholars

Yale law library’s Open Access publishing initiative produces enormous download rates for its authors, and makes the material available to scholars and others all over the world, without regard to their location or their institution’s budgetary priorities.

And many US libraries have taken this step: 55% of libraries in a just-released SPARC survey. Some other highlights:

  • About three-quarters of the programs publish between one and six journals, the majority of which are only distributed electronically
  • The vast majority of library publishing programs (almost 90%) were launched in order to contribute to change in the scholarly publishing system, supplemented by a variety of other mission-related motivations.
  • About half of responding institutions centralize management of their publishing activities within one library unit. The number of staff allocated to publishing activities is modest—averaging 2.4 FTE for ARLs and 0.9 FTE for Oberlin Group institutions—with older programs typically being larger. Staff dedicated exclusively to publishing service programs are relatively rare, with responsibility for such services typically fragmented across multiple staff members.
  • The most prevalent journal publishing platforms reported were Open Journal Systems (57%), DSpace (36%), and Berkeley Electronic Press’s Digital Commons (25%).

Comments

  1. 1.
    United States
    Harvard Law School
    http://dash.harvard.edu/
    Policy details http://roarmap.eprints.org/81/

    2.
    United States
    University of Puerto Rico School Of Law
    http://repositorio.upr.edu:8080/jspui
    Policy details http://roarmap.eprints.org/276/

    3.
    United Kingdom
    Birkbeck College, School of Law, University of London
    http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk
    Policy details http://roarmap.eprints.org/307/