Proof and Causation: When Courts and Scientists Disagree
[This column was written with the asstance of Meredith James.]
One of the challenges in environmental work is the inconsistent and erratic relationship between law and science. To be effective, environmental policy needs to be based on good science, which is why current government cuts to key environmental research are so harmful, in both the short and the long run. But even when good science exists, the law struggles to properly incorporate it, and sometimes science can’t (yet?) answer the questions the courts are interested in. What should happen then?
Criminal cases
The courts sometimes seem to have a poor . . . [more]
