2 Comments
Posted in:

Should People Commenting on an Election Have to Use Their Real Names?

by
More posts by John »

The government of South Australia has recently adopted a law that requires people commenting on the forthcoming state election to use their real names, and media will have to retain the names and addresses for six months. The requirement appears to apply to bloggers and comments on blogs etc.

Unsurprisingly, not everyone likes this.

Is it fair to say that requiring people to give their real names is a “gag” on debate?

Would the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms prevent such a law in this country? In other words, does the freedom of expression protect anonymous speech?

Comments

  1. Simon Fodden
    February 2nd, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    Well that was a fast ride in a bad car: South Australia’s AG backed down today:

    From the feedback we’ve received through AdelaideNow, the blogging generation believes that the law supported by all MPs and all political parties is unduly restrictive. I have listened. I will immediately after the election move to repeal the law retrospectively… It may be humiliating for me, but that’s politics in a democracy and I’ll take my lumps.

  2. John G
    February 2nd, 2010 at 8:44 pm

    I suppose if the legislature has been dissolved for the election (in late March, I believe) then the law could not be repealed before then. After the election, of course, there might be a different Attorney General, or government.

    But: is this a good idea anyway? Would the Charter prevent it here, even if it were thought to be a good idea?