«« older | newer »»

author photo

March 1, 2010

John Gregory

Online Voting in Alberta or Elsewhere

According to a report by Richard Liebrecht of the QMI Agency:

Alberta Musing Online Election Voting
New election rules have cleared the way for Internet and electronic voting, which could come to Alberta as early as 2013. “Obviously that online voting is something that’s on the forefront of people’s minds … people say, ‘I can do my banking online, but I can’t do my voting online’,” said Brian Fjeldheim, Alberta’s Chief Electoral Officer.

The Chief Electoral Officer went on to say “Once it has been proven to be effective, that the votes can be certified, all that security stuff can be looked after, I certainly see that as something that’s coming.”

How easy is looking after “all that security stuff”?

Is the parallel between e-voting and e-banking valid?

A few years ago ("Electronic Voting and the Law") I suggested (unofficially, of course) a few reasons why Internet voting is not like Internet banking. Was I unduly pessimistic? Or are people in fact a bit too blasé about the security of e-banking?

[via Internet Law News]

John D. Gregory is an Ontario lawyer called in 1977, with a special interest in what happens to the law when you take the paper away. He works in civil justice law reform at the Ministry of the Attorney General, but his Slawian opinions are not necessarily those of the Ministry.
[click on the author's name for more information]

Respond: make a comment | read the 3 comments

Share: Email | Save as PDF | Print | Bookmark & Share | Clip to Evernote | Reader later on Instapaper

More: in Administration of Slaw or Substantive Law or Technology or ulc_ecomm_list | from

up

3 Comments on “Online Voting in Alberta or Elsewhere”

  1. Simon Fodden says:
    March 1, 2010 at 11:36 am

    Thanks to a member of John Gregory's ULC-ECOMM email list, the original source of this post, we have a link to the bill in question [PDF], and a link to the statement [DOC] in the legislature introducing the bill.

  2. Bradley Albrecht says:
    March 1, 2010 at 5:27 pm

    I think the comparison between voting and banking can only go so far. If someone's money went missing, they would notice. But how would you know if your vote went missing?

    Voting falls under the broad umbrella of "Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done." Even if (big if) an ideal, secure on-line system were available, its use would close an election off to meaningful popular scrutiny.

  3. Francis Barragan says:
    March 1, 2010 at 8:51 pm

    I may get burned someday on this, but I just don't see how this is feasible in the next 10 years at least. The public trust just won't be there until a long time. Even if the security means were perfect (paper polling is not perfect either, but that's another matter), the public trust in the process is essential and I can't see how it could be accomplished, at least in the near future.

SlawTips      

SlawTips Top 10 Financial Errors: #9 Avoid Having a Written Office-Sharing or Partnership Agreement
Thursday, February 9

Max Amsterdam once said: “Business is the art of extracting money from another man’s pocket without resorting to violence.” The purpose of having a written agreement between all … »»

Practice

SlawTips Open Access Journals
Wednesday, February 8

There is good leagal content that doesn’t necessarily come in the neat packages that we usually look in.  Though our commercial legal database subscriptions have linked, vetted, edited, and easily. […] »»

Research

SlawTips Use join.me to Get on the Same Page Across the Web
Wednesday, February 8

When you need to collaborate on a document displayed on your screen, it’s great to have a colleague from down the hall come into your office and look over your … »»

Technology

noted on Slaw    

MLB Selected Case Summaries    

These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.
  • McGowan v. Bank of Nova Scotia 2011 PECA 20

    Banks and Banking - Liability of banks to third parties - Negligence - General

    The plaintiffs were the former shareholders of a company that failed. They sued the defendant bank alleging that it breached its contract with the company and the plaintiffs and breached a duty ...

  • Jones v. Tsige 2012 ONCA 32

    Actions - Cause of action - General principles - New or extended cause of action - Opening of floodgates

    The plaintiff and defendant worked at different branches of the same bank. The defendant’s common-law husband was the plaintiff’s ex-husband. Over a four year period, the defendant ...

  • Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 2011 FC 1435

    Aliens - Definitions and general principles - Immigration consultants

    The Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) had been designated as the sole regulatory body of immigration consultants in Canada from 2004 until June 2011. On June 30, 2011, Bill C-35 came into force, which significantly amended ...

  • R. v. Benson (A.J.) 2012 SKCA 4

    Criminal Law - Sexual offences, public morals and disorderly conduct - Public morals - Obscenity - Possession of child pornography

    The accused was convicted of making child pornography available and two counts of possession of child pornography (see [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 197). Subsequently, he was sentenced ...

  • R. v. Rowe (J.) 2011 ONCA 753

    Criminal Law - Procedure - Charge or directions - Jury or judge alone - Directions regarding pleas or evidence of witnesses, co-accused and accomplices

    Rowe was convicted by a jury of five offences. He appealed.

    The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed ...

  • R. v. Parker (T.) 2011 ONCA 819

    Narcotic Control - Offences - Possession - General

    The accused wished to access marijuana for medicinal purposes but did not have an authorization to possess marijuana issued under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations. He was notified that a package of marihuana addressed to him had been ...

  • R. v. McCrady (R.C.) 2011 ONCA 820

    Narcotic Control - General - Legislation - Exemptions - Medicinal marijuana

    McCrady, who had an application pending under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) to possess and grow marijuana, was convicted of possession of marijuana (Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), s. 4(1)). Hearn pleaded guilty ...

  • R. v. Maloney (S.W.) 2011 ONCA 821

    Criminal Law - Sentence - Trafficking in hashish or marijuana (incl. possession for purposes of trafficking)

    The accused pleaded guilty to one count of possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking. He was sentenced to 30 days’ imprisonment to be served intermittently and 11 months’ ...

  • Catalyst Paper Corp. v. North Cowichan (District) 2012 SCC 2

    Municipal Law - Powers of municipalities - Particular powers - Imposition and collection of taxes or fees 

    Catalyst Paper Corp. operated a paper mill in the District of North Cowichan. Catalyst objected to the tax rate that it paid compared to residential ratepayers. In 2009, the ...

law foundation icon

The re-development
of Slaw is assisted by
a grant from the
Law Foundation of Ontario

TalkLaw/ParLoi    

This is a listing of a few upcoming events in Canada of interest to lawyers, law students, legal librarians, and others involved in the practice of law.

Clicking on any event in the list below will give you access to more information and to links allowing you to see the full entry and to add the event to your own calendar.

Click this link for a fuller version of the TalkLaw/ParLoi calendar of events and for instructions as to how to add events and calendars to your own calendar.

Switch to our mobile site