The Courts and Wikipedia – a New Crutch for Judicial Notice?
Apiece in yesterday’s NYT about how US courts are using Wikipedia
The NYT story suggests that it’s largely due to law clerks who turn to Wikipedia to verify background facts, even though the controversy about the source has not abated. That’s also what I’ve seen recently, marking Jessup Moot factums, where Wikipedia seems to be substituting for conventional authority.
The NYT story ends with Stephen Gillers of NYU:
. . . [more]Stephen Gillers, a professor at New York University Law School, saw this as crucial: “The most critical fact is public acceptance, including the litigants,” he said. “A judge should not use Wikipedia


