Cyber criminals and identity thieves want to steal your personal information to commit fraud. They may try to get a credit card in your name or to access funds in your bank account. On top of directly losing money, your credit status can be damaged and it can take a great deal of time and expense to restore your good name.

And this goes beyond being an issue of personal concern. LAWPRO has seen situations where law firm bank accounts were hacked and where law firm bank account information was used on counterfeit cheques.

There are many different ways to . . . [more]

The fall-out from the Snowden revelations and the evident powers of the UK Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) continues in the UK this week. Lawyers and the Law are being portrayed in the press in a different light. See this article in the Guardian – “Parliament Has Forsaken our liberty. Law is the Last Resort.” . . . [more]

North American courts are not really sure what to do about web scraping, where someone uses automation to take information in bulk from a web site and puts it on his/her/its own site in competition with the original site. Sometimes (but not often) doing this is held to be trespass to chattels. More often it has been held to violate the terms of use of the victim site, even if those terms are ‘webwrap’, i.e. never explicitly consented to. (In fact, it is freakishly rare for webwrap conditions to be upheld except against scrapers).

The federal court in Illinois recently . . . [more]

Each Monday we present brief excerpts of recent posts from five of Canada's award-winning legal blogs chosen at random* from forty-one recent Clawbie winners. In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible.

This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. University of Alberta Faculty of Law Blog   2. Thoughtful Legal Management   3. Le Blogue du CRL   4. Michael Geist    5. First Reference

When is an author not the author?

The publication of the twenty fifth annual edition of Tremeear’s Criminal Code by David Watt and Michelle Fuerst raises an obvious question about the naming tradition in legal publishing. Why name a new edition of a book after someone long deceased, who had nothing to do with its creation.

Specifically, why name an annotated Criminal Code prepared by Justices Watt and Fuerst Tremeears Criminal Code?

The making of a “tradition”

Over the past century or two, a practice evolved whereby legal publishers launched new editions of established works under the name of . . . [more]

This week the Supreme Court of Canada released the decision in Cuthbertson v. Rasouli, involving a dispute between physicians and the family members of a patient who was on life support.

Summary of the Majority Decision

The dispute involved a patient who experienced severe brain damage from an infection following the removal of a benign tumour, resulting in what the physicians called a persistent vegetative state. The patient was kept alive through life support, and the physicians wanted to stop this care over and above the objections of the patient’s family members, who expressed the patient’s prior expressed intention . . . [more]

Summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book. Every Sunday we present a precis of the latest summaries, a fuller version of which can be found on MLB-Slaw Selected Case Summaries at cases.slaw.ca.

This week's summaries concern: Judicial reasons / Discovery of settlement documents / Expropriation & interest / drug-sniffing dogs:

Bien que l'étendue de l'équité procédurale à laquelle est tenue la Commission d'enquête sur l'octroi et la gestion des contrats publics dans l'industrie de la construction soit très élevée, cette dernière était fondée, dans les circonstances, à refuser aux requérants le droit de contre-interroger l'auteur d'un témoignage les impliquant dans des tractations potentiellement répréhensibles.

Twitter has started giving its users the option to accept direct messages (DMs) from anyone who follows them. In the past, only mutual follow relationships had the DM feature available.

Located under the first settings tab in your profile, the option looks like this:

Why would twitter do this? All Things D suggests that the network is getting set for an overhaul to their DM functionality. Dan Pinnington correctly adds that this might be a new opportunity for abuse by spammers. Both responses are likely correct.

Personally, I’m curious about what Twitter’s future direction for DMs will be. Because, . . . [more]

Is continuing legal education the professional equivalent of renewing your driver’s licence – requiring little of you beyond that you show up, pay your fee and get your picture taken?

That was one of the questions asked during Tuesday night’s Twitter chat this week, where the discussion focused on the utility – or futility – of CLE.

While some participants made the argument that CLE is useful – Karen Dyck, for example, says lawyers will often have an “Aha!” moment that will send them back to the office to implement lessons learned. Sara Cohen says CLE is essential, “especially for . . . [more]

Things are more complicated than you imagine — at least I find that to be so.

I mean: there are more than 250 species of bumble bees alone; bees are more genetically related to ants than they are to wasps; and some bees are blue.

Hell, complexity is itself complex: it’s there whether you take the short or the long view. Drop back and not only are there 258 species of bumble bee, but thirteen whole families of bees, of which apidae, the family to which bumbles belong, is only one — and one shared by a host of . . . [more]

Legal information is boring. As much as you may enjoy reading a court case, a legal article or conducting legal research, the experience cannot realistically be compared to listening to a song or planning a vacation. Browsing a legal resource will never entertain you more than searching YouTube or TripAdvisor. Exceptionally, isolated masterpieces here and there spark a certain degree of buzz and then the tide of uninteresting data takes over again.

Legal information professionals and users should not feel singled out though, because legal information is not the only boring information out there.

But why is it that legal . . . [more]